Obama Waves Off Intel Briefing – “Don’t Bother Me With This Shit”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

When you think about it, is Obama speaking about We The People or the National Security Briefing which I submit are one in the same.


When he said ” Don’t bother me with that sh*t take to Susan or Dennis,” That is Obamics for let Valerie do it she’s running the entire show, not me.

Valerie Jarett do it, Obama’s Iranian squeeze.  Isn’t it great to have connections deep withint the White House with the Muslim Brotherhood?


Hours prior to taking off for his Martha’s Vineyard millionaires’ paradise vacation, White House staff in conjunction with  someone from the Pentagon, attempted to update the president on international security concerns, namely those focused on both Syria and Iraq, as well as the ongoing Gaza conflict,

 an attempt that was brushed off by a clearly annoyed Barack Obama who wanted nothing more than to turn his back on the demands of a job he long ago grew tired of.



The staff member in question was apparently Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken.  The name of the Pentagon official could not be confirmed.


Blinken entered Barack Obama’s private, second floor study and then soon after was seen following the president down the hallway adjacent to Valerie Jarrett’s office with the Pentagon official in tow.  A clearly annoyed President Obama waved away Blinken’s attempt to have a moment to update the president on the various situations in the Middle East, the Commander in Chief mumbling the following as he then quickened his pace toward the Private Residence:


“Don’t bother me with this sh*t.  Update Susan or take it to Denis.  You know the drill.”


Blinken and the Pentagon official were left standing in the middle of the second floor hallway and then soon after made their way back downstairs to the West Wing.

From Iraq to the Heartland

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot. 
Nothing more need be said, the Chief, gives you all the back ground information on this dead street  thug that is needed.
Presuming it’s true, he would make an interesting defense witness.

H/T Charleston Thug life by Chief.

Wow! So, another police officer jumped out of his car in the ghetto for absolutely no reason, put a black guy on the ground with his hands up and then filled him full of lead? What a shame. Well, no, more like “what a sham”.


Too bad that narrative has been perpetuated by witnesses of the same quality as those in downtown Charleston, the media, the NAACP, the President of the United States and any number of other well known race-baiters.

According to the liberal media who are gleefully reporting any perceived slights to the black population in Ferguson, Missouri, when a group of rioters forms and begins looting, throwing bricks and Molotov cocktails and shooting, the police should turn around and go home. Taking action against those criminals is just racist. And the police brought *gasp* guns and shit.

The media wants you to buy into the story that Michael Brown was a naive, helpless child who was puzzled when an evil police officer told him to get out of the street. He was not. “Big’mike Jr. Brown” was a six foot something, 260 pound, 18 year old gang member with a criminal history including burglary, “armed criminal action” and 1st degree assault.

Details are slowly emerging which indicate Brown and his pal Dorian Johnson initiated a confrontation with a police officer responding to a call. Brown severely beat the officer and caught a round as a result. When he charged the badly beaten officer a second time, he caught a few more.

Once again we are presented with the mindset that any action taken against a black criminal is a racist action. The officer should have just taken that beating, thanked the “teen” and gone on his way having learned a valuable lesson in race relations.

We don’t think this incident was racist because, as you can see in the photo below, Brown was not wearing a hoodie. We all know the presence of a hoodie automatically makes everything racist.


If gang members were smart they would start carrying throw-down hoodies to leave at scenes so the NAACP and Al Sharpton would have some sure fire ammunition to use against the cops.



Of the gang members on Brown’s Thugbook friends list, most seem to identify with the Bloods. We did see a few throwing the sign for the Vice Lords, though. NBC news ran this photo from Brown’s Thugbook page. the photo was date 8 July, 2014.






Would it surprise you to find out NBC edited that photo? Here is the full photo with Brown throwing what appears to be a version of the Vice Lord sign.


Apparently Brown changed his mind. In 2012 he was showing Blood signs. You will note the media chose not to use these photos of Brown.




 We found this media editing of photos to hide the facts very interesting because CBS News just ran a story about some ridiculous hashtag thing where people are posting two photos to their social media accounts using the tag “iftheygunnedmedown”.



It is a propaganda effort initiated to claim the media will always publish the gang sign photo instead of the church clothes photo. As usual, the evidence provided by the media’s own actions puts the lie to this alleged tendency of the media to show the gang sign photos.

Here is the 2013 photo of Brown most of the media is using. Just another kid in the game room, huh?



 Edit: A very  helpful reader has pointed out that the photo below is actually a shot of Jodah Cain, a guy who murdered his great-grandmother in Portland, Oregon last year. It is not a picture of Micheal Brown from Ferguson, Mo.



ScreenHunter_7437-Aug.-14-16.19We decided to spend a few minutes browsing through Brown’s friends list.

Here is what we found in just fifteen minutes. “Luh Vee” looks like he’s throwing a Blood sign there

. He’s talking about going back up to the riots. “Leo DaKid” says he needs a gun. Leo’s Thugbook page was deleted just as we started going through it. Can’t help but wonder what he’s trying to hide.



Brown’s buddy “Ty Da Shooter” wants to take the advice of Al Sharpton and the New Black Prancers and “fuck em up while we still got the opportunity”.  Hey, they can’t shoot all the thugs, right?


Continue reading

If Michael Brown was shot by the police as stated where are the pictures and video that might confirm it?

crew-2231By Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The thought occurred to we while watching and listening to the accounts about the alleged gun down by the Police in Ferguson, Missouri, of Michael Brown; where are the pictures and video?

APTOPIX Police Shooting Missouri

Many of those who were there at the time had video and photo capability using their cell phones, so where is the photographic evidence to substantiate their position?

I suggest it’s because no such evidence exists.

To the opposite one might ask where is the pictorial evidence showing Brown wasn’t gunned down as stated by the police,

Does it exit?

What we do know is a street thug is dead who will rob and attempt to kill no more.

The city of Ferguson must wait for all the forensic evidence to be completed, not the least of which would be the gun powder and bullet allegedly fired into the officer’s car, and the toxicology screen which might explain Michael Brown’s alleged charging the officer who shot him.


While the Brown family and his supporters along with unemployable race hustlers, Jackson and Sharpton are on the scent  attempting to taint the jury pool, it’s time to take a deep breath and let “Justice,” take its course.

Justice will not likely be found in Ferguson, a different venue for the trial will be required.


What say you?


Continue reading

Unclassified: Army’s Plan For Use Of Lethal Force In Riot Situations

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The likelihood  of members of the U.S. Military firing on U.S. Citizens is not probable.

Like it or not, Obama doesn’t have the authority to call out the troops during a riot, this is the job of the Governor to call up his National Guard.



Each member of today’s military have sworn an oath to observe and protect the Constitution of the United States. 

To do so would be to follow an illegal order ginned up by the current mad man in the Oval office.

With the police, I’m not as confident, many of them are born with I call a latent “Nazi Gene,” and may well fire if given an order.

Billboard 5

We hear about this with SWAT teams attacking the wrong homes, killing and injuring then innocents who live there.

A declassified April 2014 Army Techniques Publication (ATP) outlines techniques for the Army to use against civilians in the U.S. and around the world when demonstrations turn to riots that must be brought under control.



It must be noted that the ATP document makes clear the ROE are different in the continental U.S. (CONUS) versus outside the continental U.S. (OCONUS), and stresses that those differences have to be taken into consideration.

The military is significantly more restricted in acting against civilians within in the continental United States by a number of federal laws, including provisions within the Constitution, Insurrection Act (10 USC 333–334), the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385), and several other statutes outlined in the document. 

As the document states, “for the U.S. Army, conducting civil disturbance missions within the United States will vary greatly when compared to conducting civil disturbance missions within a foreign country where the U.S. Army is conducting operations.”

The response includes non-lethal weapons (NLW), lethal weapons, Military Working Dogs (MWD), Designated Marksmen (DM)–which are snipers–and aircraft for psychological impact.

The ATP document sets forth the formation of a Graduated Response Matrix (GPM) as the means to control the timing/deployment of the various weapons/methods against demonstrators. It also provides a rough example of how a GPM unfolds in real time:

See entire article below.

Continue reading

Rob Reiner – Really?! Are you nuts?!

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Ordinarily this site likes to avoid the mindless opinions of  the mindless has-been


If anything Reiner shows definitively that being rich can’t buy the intelligence.

He has reached the stature of Barbara Streisand as he opines in the video below.

Posted by Victoria Jackson on August 18, 2014

(Rob Reiner playing the Liberal “Meathead” on All in the Family)

Archie Bunker dubbed him “Meat Head,” and Archie was right.

Rob Reiner compared the terrorist group Hamas to the Tea Party this week, saying they are both extremist groups who need to be eliminated.




Story here.

Hamas = Tea Party

Seriously ?? Rob Reiner, are you nuts?

                                                                              (Rob Reiner, the Liberal, now)


Hamas cuts peoples heads off. Tea Partiers pray for peace, sing Amazing Grace and hold American flags and signs.

Hamas cuts children in half. Tea Partiers read the Constitution and pass copies out for free.

Hamas trains their children to be suicide bombers. Tea Partiers home-school their children and teach them to “love thy neighbor as thyself.”

Hamas preaches violence and death. Tea Partiers support life, and Pro-Life causes, even paying for Pregnancy Centers to help pregnant teens keep their babies or have them adopted.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

A Democrat Wart Deep in the Heart of Texas

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.
We can only hope as the author, Russ Vaughan, suggests at the end of his article that Rosemary Lehmberg, the Democrat D.A. of Travis County, TX is having her 15 minutes of fame.
The likelihood is however she will drive drunk again, hurt or kill someone so that here arrest will rise to the level of a felony.
There are distinct differences between a misdemeanor and a felony DUI indictment. A felony DUI comprises more serious circumstances than simply exceeding blood alcohol limits. Felony DUI points to habitual offenders or a driver causing bodily harm to one or more individuals. If a driver is responsible for an accident resulting in injury or death to someone else, the driver can anticipate felony charges.

In addition, many states escalate a DUI from a misdemeanor to a felony if a driver had a prior DUI offense within a certain period of time. This is typically seven years, although it depends upon the jurisdiction. If the driver has a previous felony DUI conviction – regardless of time elapsed since the prior conviction — he or she will be charged with a felony DUI again.

The American Thinker
August 18, 2014


If ever there existed a better example of shooting one’s self in the foot than what Rosemary Lehmberg, the Democrat district attorney of Travis County, Texas, did over this weekend, I cannot recall it in my seven decades. We are aware that in facing the coming election the Democrat party is becoming frantic but we didn’t think it had advanced to the need for self-immolation.

She will be out of jail in half the time. 

But, liar, liar, set herself on fire is precisely what that desperate Democrat did when her special prosecutor indicted Texas governor, Rick Perry, for carrying out his constitutionally determined, gubernatorial responsibilities.

From the moment the indictment was announced, the Internet was treated to devastating video recordings of the drunken driving arrest in Austin last year of the self-same Rosemary Lehmberg, stopped by her own cops after weaving in a potentially deadly manner into oncoming traffic as well as the lane reserved for particularly vulnerable bicyclists.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Dershowitz: Perry Indictment ‘What Happens in Totalitarian Societies’

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

A grand jury indictment simply means that sufficient evidence was presented to go forward with a trial.

Monday, 18 Aug 2014

By Wanda Carruthers

Perry1CMS_jpg_800x1000_q100The indictment of Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry over abuse of power and coercion is reminiscent of the way that political dissent was handled in the Soviet Union, legal scholar and Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax TV’s “America’s Forum.”

Skip to a 1:40 minutes to Allen Dershowitz a liberal democrat law professor doesn’t agree with the indictment as well.

Dershowitz, who make clear he would never vote for Rick Perry, said Monday the governor’s indictment was driven by politics and is representative of “what happens in totalitarian societies.”

He said disagreement with Perry’s actions is “not the basis of what a criminal charge should be,” adding that Americans have the ability to “vote against him” if they don’t like his actions.

 “The two statutes under which he was indicted are reminiscent of the old Soviet Union — you know, abuse of authority,” Dershowitz said Monday. “The idea of indicting him because he threatened to veto spending unless a district attorney who was caught drinking and driving resigned, that’s not anything for a criminal indictment. That’s a political issue.”

Perry was indicted Friday, accused of abuse of power by withholding funds to the district attorney’s office in Travis County — county seat of Austin, Texas — following the drunk-driving arrest of county District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg. He was also charged with coercion, as opponents claimed his veto of funds for the county’s integrity unit was an attempt to force Lehmberg to resign.

Similar cases of using the criminal justice system to attack political adversaries are cropping up in other states, including Alaska, New York, and Virginia, Dershowitz said, adding that the practice has to end because it makes people “very suspicious of criminal justice and of the legal system.”

“Right now, we are seeing it. It’s beginning to spread. And that’s why it’s so important to put a stop to it now, and to say the criminal law is reserved for real crimes, not for political differences where a party in power or out of power gets revenge against the other party. That’s just not the way to use the criminal justice [system],” he said.

More from Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley who doesn’t agree with the indictment as well.

Continue reading

You Work This Many Hours a Week to Pay Your Federal Taxes

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


From the Tax Foundation we haven’t seen anything yet.


This is what the poser has in store for We the People in 2015

He will have slithered out of Dodge and in his twisted delusional mind  he will believe he saved the jobs for his members of congress who share his Marxist ideology but are nothing more thank Klingon’s who need to be kicked to the curb.

The Daily Signal

Stephen Moore, who formerly wrote on the economy and public policy for The Wall Street Journal, is chief economist at The Heritage Foundation. Read his research.


We talk about taxes as a “burden” because they reduce the take-home pay of American workers, the profits of American businesses, and the purchasing power of American consumers.

Over the past century, the overall federal tax burden steadily grew from about 5 percent of national income to almost 20 percent. Over the last decade, tax receipts declined due to the recession and fiscal policy, but taxes have increased over the last five years. This trend roughly corresponds with the growth in government spending.

Americans effectively work one day a week to pay federal taxes and the other four days to pay their bills and take care of their families. Taking into account state and local taxes, almost one in three dollars of a worker’s earnings go to the tax collector. Taxes are, for many households, the single largest expenditure item in the family budget.

Read entire article about destruction of the U.S. Economy after “The One.” is gone.

Continue reading

Ben Carson: I Challenged Al Sharpton to a Debate

Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,149 other followers

%d bloggers like this: