OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certification of Birth


DOCUMENT CONFIRMS INVESTIGATORS’ SUSPICIONS, EXPOSES DOH AS LYING

by John Charlton

Post and Mail

February 9, 2010


It certainly appears from the provided COLB below, that the certificate of live birth provided by Obama on his website is a total fraud as has been suggested in the past. It is indeed a sad state of affairs when the court system of the United States of America cannot be trusted.  To continually deny requests for Obama to provide requested documents, leads one to believe that there is something far worse than the Obama administration at stake!  Random thoughts while questioning the objectivity of our legal system, J.C.

The Hawaii 1981 Certificate of Live Birth for Alan Paliko Booth (full size image).

(Feb. 10, 2010) — Miki Booth, a native Hawaiian and candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives for the State of Oklahoma, shocked and awed Obama supporters during the recent Tea Party Nation convention in Memphis, TN, when she publicly disclosed the Certificate of Live Birth for her son, Alan Paliko Booth, born on Nov. 24, 1981, at 7:55 AM, at Kapiolani Children’s Medical Center, the same hospital that Obama has claimed to be his own place of birth,nearly 20 years before.

The actual document contains a wealth of information such as the signature of the attending physician or midwife, a field for evidence presented for an Amended Birth Filing, race of parents and child, and a signature and date stamp, certifying the copy as an authentic representation of the information on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.

Importantly, the actual document, which you can view through this link, contains the fields, “Date received by Local Registrar” and “Date accepted by the State” and the name of the Local Registrar.  In recent months, Miss Janice Okubo has insisted that the terms mean the same thing and that she has no knowledge of what terms were used previously to the alleged Obama COLB.

The now widely recognized, crude forgery which Obama claims to be his own Certification of Live Birth bearing the date of 2007 but without the seal and confirmatory signature of the State Registrar, does not contain information regarding the race of the child or the date accepted.

This has led private researchers to speculate that Obama’s original vital records, which Dr. Fukino claims to have seen and which she herself admits are several, might contain a delayed birth filing, an amended birth filing, adoption record, or other changes regarding the name of the child and parents and location or nation in which the child was purported to be born.

The details of this actual 1981 “long form” “birth certificate” indicate more precisely the possible motives Obama might have for refusing to disclose his own real certificate, that is, if he was in fact born in Hawaii in the first place.  Because the actual form might indicate:

1) Race of Child: Negro or White — in the former case, Obama’s racism might take offense; in the latter case his race politics might be undone;

2) Race of Parent: Father might be indicated as Negro rather than African, which would gut the prima facie evidentiary value of his own alleged BC.

3) Parents might not be who they are claimed to be — there has been a lot of speculation on that;

4) Place of birth might have originally been Mombassa, Kenya, as Obama’s Co-grandmother and he himself have in the past claimed; if so, Obama is perhaps not even a U.S. Citizen.

5) No father might have been indicated originally, because Obama’s mother might not have been sure who the father was at the precise moment of the original filing — which would reflect badly on his mother’s morals and cast doubt upon any evidentiary value of whomever was subsequently claimed to be the real father; because doubt in such cases is prima facie evidence that there was more than one man who could have been the father.

6) Name of child might not be Barack Hussein Obama II, which, in the absence of name changes, would make Obama’s usage of his current name unlawful. Source

About these ads

9 responses to “OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certification of Birth

  1. Ya know,… I don’t care if Obama was born under a rock.
    What I care about is his radical philosophies, determined to destroy the greatest country ever, and the republic, and the democracy that has been a beacon to the oppressed people of the world.

    This man is nothing more than a pimple on Americas Ass !!

  2. The reason that Obama does not show the original of his birth certificate is that he does not have it. He cannot show what he does not have.

    Sure, his family had an original, but it was lost over the years. So, in 2007, he asked for a copy of the original, and Hawaii sent him what it sends to EVERYONE these days, the short-form Certification of Live Birth.

    But that is now the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and when it says “born in Hawaii” on it, as Obamas’ does, it is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. And, in Obama’s case, the facts on his Certification were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, who are members of Republican governor’s administration.

    Re the person who showed a 1981 birth certificate. Sure. that family did not lose it so they did not have to ask Hawaii for a copy, so they were not sent a COLB. Obama, however, was sent a COLB, and that is all that he can show.

    Fortunately, it is a legal document and the facts on it were twice confirmed.

  3. To AFVET I agree with the exception that I would like to believe our Constitution has some relevance. That the judges that refuse to hear theses cases and continue to not hear them for dubious reasons, I would like to believe that the courts are not part of the game. It will be interesting to see not that a suit has been filed against Columbia University alleging that Obama never attended the institution and they perpetrated a fraud when they “gave him an unearned degree” It is alleged by private investigators, that there are no living Political Science Professors, now still at Columbia that ever recalled him being a student, no transcripts available, no friends coming forward saying Obey Wanna Know me was my best bud, no year book pictures, nothing, apparently the charges to be presented will show he wasn’t there as Barry or Barack. If the courts refuse to hear this case it won’t be a coincidence in my opinion. It will just show that our legal system is shot.

  4. Mr Strauss: You sure make more unproven assumptions base upon your imagination than those of us that seek the truth. (Sure, his family had an original, but it was lost over the years.) and your source would be? Any better than the eyewitness testimony of the sister and the grandmother and the govt. official who have sworn he was born what is now called Kenya ( again you are factually in error) So, in 2007, he asked for a copy of the original, and Hawaii sent him what it sends to EVERYONE these days, the short-form Certification of Live Birth.) I went back to my posting and found that the photograph had been removed along with several other stories carrying the picture,from other bloggers. Why do you suppose that might be? A person showing her own sons COLB from Hawaii? This alone you should find an outrage. (But that is now the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and when it says “born in Hawaii” on it, as Obamas’ does, it is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by the US State Department and the branches of the US military. And, in Obama’s case, the facts on his Certification were twice confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, (from which of the two hospitals he was supposedly born in?)who are members of Republican governor’s administration.) Proves nothing, look for Janice Okubo to resign today or tomorrow. She knows that she is personally being sued for lying based upon the fact that the long form as I had shown is clearly sent to people who are trying to cover nothing up!

    Re the person who showed a 1981 birth certificate. Sure. that family did not lose it so they did not have to ask Hawaii for a copy, so they were not sent a COLB. Obama, however, was sent a COLB, and that is all that he can show. Does your sentence make any sense? What is your proof that the family didn’t request it and receive it? ( In separate communication with you I provided that sourcing that stated that her son’s COLB was a copy of the vault certificate, thus your musings are unwarranted. More important why are you not interested in finding the truth? I can handle it either way. If he’s legit, open the sealed files what does he have to hide. It astounds me that you want to keep trying to bury an issue that has not been settled, the COLB he posted is also gone the total forgery that it was. What is up with you Mr. Strauss?

  5. The fix is in a conspiracy exists to block the uncovering of documents. All we can hope for is after 2012 something will come out vindicating us.

  6. What has the racists in the FBI, CIA, KKK, NRA and the Secret Service being doing about this matter? Surely they looked into it long before Obama was elected. They’ed be goddam if they’ed let a nigger become president without making an effort to stop him. Especially those klan guys in the FBI! You mean to tell me that the FBI is going to let a bunch of kooks expose the alleged fraud when it was their duty to do so? Get off of it!

  7. Yo Kamana kapu, interesting take, but I believe that there is nothing to site that indicates the groups you mention are racist. Would you except the probability that there are powers to be that wanted Obama to become president to push his progressive agenda? If not take the time to read up on the effect the Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, the Council of Foreign Relations and most important the Federal Reserve have in making sure we are a financial disaster. Put your race card away and do some home work and then come back. I’m Jim

  8. What you need to understand here is two things. Under Hawaiian law the “Certification of Live Birth” contains information from the “Certificate of Live Birth”. In the first instance of the COLB there is a field that has one of two pieces of information. “Date filed by registrar” or “Date accepted by the State”. In all of the COLB that have been published to compare with Zeros they all stated “Date Accepted”. Zero’s states “Date filed” In the image above you can clearly see that there are those two fields. So it is safe to presume that the second field of “Date accepted” in Zeros COLB has no information because the state never accepted evidence of his birth.

  9. Set aside the whole BC issue and ask HOW CAN THE STATUS AT BIRTH OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES BE ‘GOVERNED’ by the laws of Great Britain?
    The basis of this question comes from what BO posted on his own website:

    “When BarackObama Jr. was born on aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the UK’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children”

    I wonder what is actually on the COLB that Dr. Fukino claims to have seen. Could it be that Stanley Ann gave her son her own last name as so many hippie/freelove mothers do? Barry Dunham perhaps?

    The speculation will go on and on. JUST SHOW THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE!

    Alan’s mom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s