Jihad? What jihad? Obama bans mention of Islam, jihad, from National Security Strategy document

Jihad Watch

Aren’t you feeling so much safer and better with a president and an administration that believes that Jihad is the fault of the U.S. and it will all go away if he is nice and bows?  It’s time for these incompetents to leave Washington. Random thoughts while observing the passing parade, I’m J.C.

I thought this had been done some time ago, but in any case this “larger effort…to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education” reflects Obama’s core assumption that the jihad against the United States is our fault, and can be quelled by our overtures of good will to the Islamic world.

Should be Obama’s Koran

This is based on the further assumption that there is no Islamic imperative to jihad against unbelievers simply because they are unbelievers. Unfortunately, however, there is, and so Obama’s exercise in willful blindness and obfuscation is as doomed to failure as was Bush’s and all the rest.

“Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document,” from AP, April 7:

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s advisers will remove religious terms such as “Islamic extremism” from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: “The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.”

The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document still was being written, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document will be the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, like his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.

The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.

That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo, Egypt, and promised a “new beginning” in the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terror and winning the war of ideas.

“You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, ‘We’re building you a hospital so you don’t become terrorists.’ That doesn’t make much sense,” said National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy.

Ramamurthy runs the administration’s Global Engagement Directorate, a four-person National Security Council team that Obama launched last May with little fanfare and a vague mission to use diplomacy and outreach “in pursuit of a host of national security objectives.”…