Lieberman: Omitting ‘Islamic’ Terrorism From Security Document Dishonest, ‘Offensive’

By Christopher Logan

Are we to expect more from the current Muslim-in-chief?  He who apologizes and bows to the world for our arrogance. An individual so profoundly ignorant, yet narcissistic he declare to the world that we won’t use nukes even if they strike first with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.  This of course as long as they are in compliance with the UN’s IAEA. Just who the hell is this guy and where is he from? Is he from the planet Marxonia in a different galaxy?  Obama is so clearly over his head that he might drown in a teaspoon of water. This poser, and fake, a socialist ideologue cannot continue to destroy America. November we make him a lame duck president, two years later we take our country back. Random thoughts while observing the passing parade, I’m J.C.

When I first read the headline of this article I pleased, that is until I read the entire article. While Senator Lieberman is obviously better than Obama on this issue, he fully does not get it either. At this point though, we have to take what we can get. I will now expose what he gets right, and what he gets wrong.

Lieberman: Omitting ‘Islamic’ Terrorism From Security Document Dishonest, ‘Offensive’
FOXNews.com

Sen. Joe Lieberman slammed the Obama administration Sunday for stripping terms like “Islamic extremism” from a key national security document, calling the move dishonest, wrong-headed and disrespectful to the majority of Muslims who are not terrorists.

Lieberman was off to a good start until he was hit with a case of Muslim Appeasement Delusional Disorder (MADD). Isn’t it more disrespectful to non-Muslims that Obama completely dropped the word Islam from the document? There are plenty of us that know that Islam itself is the problem. Maybe one day our politicians will actually be more concerned with the majority of non-Muslims, over the tiny minority of Muslims. But I doubt that day is coming anytime soon.

The Connecticut independent revealed that he wrote a letter Friday to top counterterrorism adviser John Brennan urging the administration to “identify accurately the ideological source” of the threat against the United States. He wrote that failing to identify “violent Islamist extremism” as the enemy is “offensive.”

John Brennan is absolutely in love with Islam, and is a huge part of the problem. If you can stomach his pathetic Islamic ass-kissing, please take a look at this video.

The letter was written following reports that the administration was removing religious references from the U.S. National Security Strategy — the document that had described the “ideological conflict” of the early 21st century as “the struggle against militant Islamic radicalism.”

Lieberman told “Fox News Sunday” this isn’t the first time the Obama administration has tried to tiptoe around referring to Islam in its security documents and that it’s time to “blow the whistle” on the trend.

I applaud the Senator for at least trying to keep the words “radical Islam” in the security document. In this case, something is better than nothing.

“This is not honest and, frankly, I think it’s hurtful in our relations with the Muslim world,” Lieberman said. “We’re not in a war against Islam. It’s a group of Islamist extremists who have taken the Muslim religion and made it into a political ideology, and I think if we’re not clear about that, we disrespect the overwhelming majority of Muslims who are not extremists.”

Lieberman is correct that we are not at war with Islam, but he does not realize that Islam is at war with us. Islam has been at war with the non-Islamic world ever since the days of Mohammad himself.

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

The Senator also shows his ignorance on Islam, as Islam has been a religion, and a political ideology combined since the beginning of Islam. It is a complete way of life.

From the Reliance of the Traveller, A Classic Manual of Sacred Law

025.0 THE CALIPHATE:

(n. This section has been added here by the translator because the caliphate is both obligatory in itself and the necessary precondition for hundreds of rulings (books k through o) established by Allah Most High to govern and guide Islamic community life.

Please do some research Senator.

Lieberman, in his letter, noted that prior Department of Homeland Security and Pentagon documents also did not refer to “Islamist extremism.” He expressed dismay that the administration’s review of the Fort Hood shooting, in which alleged shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan was said to have had contact with a radical cleric beforehand, omitted the term.

Lieberman is on the right track here.

“Unless we’re honest about that, we’re not going to be able to defeat this enemy,” Lieberman told “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s absolutely Orwellian and counterproductive to the fight that we’re fighting.”

We are never going to completely defeat this enemy, as it is already spread too far. Now we have to contain it. To do this, we must end all Muslim immigration, and officially ban Sharia Law. If any Muslim calls for Sharia afterwards, they shall be arrested and deported if possible. All pro-Sharia Muslims are to be looked upon as enemies of the state. Just as Nazis were.