The Western Center for Journalism
By Doug Book
I’ve written on this before, it has been reported elsewhere, FOIA releases have been redacted yielding no information. It’s clear that blue ribbon panels, and commissions, like the Warren Commission on the Assassination of JFK are cover ups because the elite don’t believe that voters can deal with the truth. More important the elite would be incapable of explaining it to the voters.
It would seem every day citizens would do a much better job than those who for whatever reason believe the have the right to withhold the truth.
To see what actually happened to J.F.K. please click here.
In 2004, Terry Lynn Nichols wrote to Attorney General John Ashcroft from his prison cell in Florence, Colorado, offering to provide a complete account of his knowledge of and participation in the Oklahoma City bombing while revealing the names and roles of individuals never pursued by the American justice system.
If Ashcroft did not believe Nichols was capable of telling the truth, or if he did not want to spend his own time on a potentially fruitless trip to Colorado, one would think the attorney general at least would have been interested enough to send a representative to find out what the convicted killer of 168 people had to say.
But Ashcroft did not respond to Nichols’ letter, addressing only an order to the Bureau of Prisons forbidding Nichols from speaking with members of the media.
In his letter to Ashcroft, Terry Nichols brought up the involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing plot of gun dealer and longtime Tim McVeigh personal friend Roger Moore. Nichols states that Moore “provided “blasting caps” and “kine-stik along with other components” necessary for the building of the bomb. Indeed Nichols claimed in a 2007 Declaration obtained by attorney Jesse Trentadue that McVeigh arranged for him to stage a sham robbery of Roger Moore’s home during which firearms, cash, and bomb making materials were taken.
According to Nichols, this “robbery of convenience” was agreed upon between Moore and McVeigh so that any trail back to Moore of items used in the bombing– fingerprint evidence and the like–could be claimed to exist merely as a byproduct of the theft, not because Roger Moore had willingly provided materials, information, and assistance to the bombers themselves.
Just prior to his Oklahoma state trial, Nichols was visited by a Mr. Selby who represented himself as an attorney “speaking for and with the authority of the United States Department of Justice and from the highest level within the Department of Justice.” Representing his visit as an “off the books” operation so its existence could be denied if ever spoken of injudiciously, and accompanied by Nichols trial attorney, Mr. Selby offered Nichols a guarantee against a death penalty verdict if he would disclose the location of the remaining explosives taken from Roger Moore prior to the bombing.
Believing the man interested in obtaining evidence against Moore, Nichols responded “I can give you Roger Moore!” But as Nichols relates it, “Mr. Selby’s reaction to my offer…was not what I had expected. Mr. Selby essentially said no deal. Mr. Selby told me that Roger Moore was ‘untouchable.’”
Roger Moore was an FBI informant. He had provided explosives and detonators to Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols. He provided cash and guns, taken in the robbery. And his role and involvement in the deaths at Oklahoma City have been covered up by the DOJ for 16 years.
There are likely many other “Roger Moores” involved in the Oklahoma City bombing, all FBI or ATF informants whose assistance to McVeigh and Nichols was invaluable and whose information and warnings back to their government employers were not acted upon. And CoachIsRight.com will expose the roles of each in his turn.
To contact your Congressional representative, use this link:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
To read more use these links:
http://dissentradio.com/tf/10th_Circuit_Nichols_Brief.pdf
http://dissentradio.com/tf/000COURT_021607_NICHOLS.pdf
http://www.corbettreport.com/cache/nicholsdeclaration2.pdf
Further reading:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54436
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=23825
http://www.911omissionreport.com/mcveigh/
Related posts:
http://www.coachisright.com/why-eric-holder-covered-up-the-1995-trentadue-murder/
This article originally appeared on CoachIsRight.com and is reprinted with permission.
Another Wilkerson doc…
http://www.cheneywatch.org/archives/301
Happy New Year Kit
I guess you are serious, LOL trust that China and Russia need us more than Iran. Both countries are in very bad shape financially as well. It would be idiotic for the US and or Israel to attack Iran. We seem to be doing well enough with cyber attacks, assassination of nuclear scientists and having launch sites blow up. We keep this up until the 2013 elections , the Muslim Midget steals it again, this time it won’t be a demonstration, it will be a well planned and coordinated overthrow of the mullahas by the people desiring freedom. I know this from contacts inside Iran. J.C.
@Kit…..
From what I have been able to discern Anthony Weiner is not a Jew. The heredity is passed down from the mother to the child. Anthony’s Father may be Jewish but his mother wasn’t…..hence he was not considered a Jew. He only has a Jewish last name. Anthony and Huma’s son will not be considered a Jew because Huma is muslim…not Jewish.
Anthony is a JINO….Jewish In Name Only.
@JC…..
I think that you are right that we just keep attacking Iran like we have been….so far it’s been working quite well. Keep them scambling to get ahead…..
I hope that 2012 will be kind to the Iranians who wish for change….
Wow Kit apparently you are surprised that people at the Cheney Watch among millions of others hated Bush and Chaney. You might want to do a little more research before you put forth information such as this based on one guys opinion. J.C. Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html Wikileaks documents show WMDs found in Iraq http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/ Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says: http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918 WMD’s found in Iraq (see links within the article) http://mythoughtworld.com/1429/wmd%E2%80%99s-found-in-iraq/ It was 550 metric tons of Yellow Cake (concentrated natural uranium) found in Iraq and shipped to Canada. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/secret-us-mission-hauls-uranium-iraq/#.TwEP9HFVv_A U.S. Secretly Takes Yellowcake From Iraq:http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/05/world/main4235028.shtml
We are in accord hot stuff. J.C.
Does it make any difference what he is? It’s Hillary that shares a box lunch with Huma, the Saudi agent. That’s the story, Weiner is just what is name indicates, a dick, his name should be weinerhead, ergo Dick Head… xoxo J.C.
No…it does not make any difference. Though many are of the same thinking as Kit just due to the fact that Dickhead carries a Jewish last name. The question that people should be asking is ” Why has a muslim been allowed to marry an infidel without her family wanting to honor kill her for the shame it brings upon them”? “Why would an Imam tell her to stick beside her infidel husband when Dickhead revealed himself and his weiner to other women”?…..These are the questions that need to be asked! Of course the answers to those questions are really quite simple to figure out. Huma Abedin hasn’t brought shame upon her family as she is following the agenda. The agenda is to be able to get information from Hillary to be able to pass it along to her mother and the terrorist organization. Huma has a higher calling than any other muslim woman!
I only asked a simple question. Why would a Jew marry a Muslim? Or vice versa? Dickhead was raised as a Jew despite regardless if he practices today.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Anthony_Weiner
I didn’t know Sharia Law would make any exception to their extreme religious doctrine. In this case Huma is allowed to s@*k Dickhead instead of just whacking Dick’s head off?
I only asked a simple question. Why would a Jew marry a Muslim? Or vice versa? Dickhead was raised as a Jew despite regardless if he practices today.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Anthony_Weiner
I didn’t know Sharia Law would make any exception to their extreme religious doctrine. In this case Huma is allowed to s@*k Dickhead instead of just whacking Dick’s head off? I assume that makes her a MINO?
Kit….
Huma has a higher calling so she is allowed to do things that other muslim women aren’t. How easy for her to get information and pass it along to her mother and the Muslim Brotherhood!
Hillary’s assistant a danger to the US~~Post continues at http://www.humanevents.com
January 1, 2012
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s aide and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin has been with Clinton since 1996. She was never properly screened, this will be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
To be concerned about Abedin’s access to sensitive information is an issue that will most likely garner unsolicited curses from “sensitive” Americans who are enamored with her. These same people ignore this diva’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Lt. Col. Robert Anderson’s detailed reports aimed at getting Army intelligence to investigate Ali Mohamed—and have him court-martialed—were also ignored.
Abedin is even more potentially dangerous: She can leak state secrets. She is closely associated with her Muslim Brotherhood family and even joined Clinton at an event with her mother, Saleha Abedin, at Dar El-Hekma College in Saudi Arabia. Also present was a close associate of Saleha Abedin—Suheir Qureshi. Qureshi’s name later appeared in several prominent Arab newspapers when it was revealed that she belonged to a list of 63 members of the secret arm of the Muslim Brotherhood called The Sisterhood. The full list was later revealed—Huma Abedin’s mother is on it. Huma’s brother—Hassan Abedin—also collaborates with Omar Naseef and Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, two of the most influential terror supporters in the world.
Yet, as detractors argue “guilt by association,” they unwittingly strengthen our case, because this is what the FBI uses when investigating federal employees: “Character. Associates. Reputation. And Loyalty to the United States. (CARL).” This checklist was never applied to Huma Abedin, who still associates with her family. Dismissing all this as “guilt by association” ignores a tough question:
Other than Huma Abedin, has there ever been a case in which a family member who either belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood or was a prominent Islamist did not denounce a Muslim female relative who married a non-Muslim male?
It’s a question with only one answer: Her family made an exception for her because Huma has a higher calling.