A truly amazing story on racism in America today!


H/T Daily Caller

Commentary by Jim Campbell

A heads up to Mr. Holder and Obama: Now hear this. Blacks are not to dumb to vote.  Some as in your case are clearly to dumb to hold elected office.  Holder will be disbarred, and Obama will be sent backing on November 6th, it has absolutely nothing to do with race.  It’s all about policy.  Their’s is a failure and they will be on the street January 20th.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

In what has been called a “serious set-back for the Holder Justice Department,” a federal appeals court has chosen to allow a lawsuit challenging a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act to go forward.

The case in question involves a 2008 referendum in which the citizens of Kinston, N.C., voted to hold nonpartisan elections, which would keep the party affiliation of the candidates off the ballots, a common practice in the state.

The Justice Department, arguing that conducting elections in this manner would effectively discriminate against black voters, used Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to block the referendum results and force the town to list party affiliations next to candidates’ names on the ballot.

Section 5 requires the Justice Department to review changes to election laws in regions known as “covered jurisdictions,” which in the past were geographical areas known to discriminate based on race. The vast majority of these jurisdictions are in the South.

At the time of the decision, Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King explained that Justice ordered the change because Kinston residents vote based on race, not party affiliation.

“In Kinston elections,” King wrote in a letter of explanation, “voters base their choice more on the race of a candidate rather than his or her political affiliation, and without either the appeal to party loyalty or the ability to vote a straight ticket, the limited remaining support from white voters for a black Democratic candidate will diminish even more.” (Lippold withdraws from Nevada CD-2 race, will not run as independent)

The Justice Department explained that citizens needed to have the party affiliation so that blacks could elect their “candidates of choice,” which the department identified as Democrats and “almost exclusively black,” according to the Washington Times in 2009.

About these ads

13 responses to “A truly amazing story on racism in America today!

  1. Brilliant…and Wild Bill too!!!!

  2. Shirley Brinker

    It was the Republicans who voted for Civil Rights, not the Democrats, But history has been so distored by the Leftist Professors and teachers that a lot of Blacks think the Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act. They have falled for the idea that they care about them. All the Democrats want is to make them dependent, which befodre wellfare they had jobs and stores in their communities. Now they do not, many are dependent as the Democrats wanted them so they would think Democrats care for them and vote for Democrats.

  3. You can call me Sir

    Wild Bill…You hit the nail on the head!

    Democrat thinking….We can’t let the niggers get off of the plantation. We’d have nobody to vote for us then.

  4. They forget; Lincoln was a Republican.
    After opposing the expansion of slavery in the United States in his campaign debates and speeches, Lincoln secured the Republican nomination and was …
    https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&tok=fzhz2xXiLKFNS97QkHhtLA&cp=13&gs_id=1i&xhr=t&q=Was+Lincoln+a+republican&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=Was+Lincoln+a&aq=0&aqi=g4&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=2303290c933ce3a0&biw=1920&bih=955

    - – -
    The Original Democrats were KKK:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2309727/posts

    • It’s far more sinister…This is not about black it’s about subjugation of the poor to keep all or as many as possible beholden to the plantation. There are a hell of a lot more white people on government assistance. J.C.

  5. Charlene Bronson

    People Forget or it is pushed aside that Martin Luther King Jr was a Republican NOT a Dem. He was Republican all the way because it has always been the republicans who want to see everyone get ahead! Race had nothing to do with it. The Democraps are the Prejudice Ones and want to keep everyone they can under their control.

    I want to see Obama, Holder, Pelosi, Reid, Kagan, Napolitano all hung for Treason with every single politician and judge who has ever voted against our constitution and bill of right tried and hung Not Shot for Treason! I was to see them swing.. I want to watch the life drain out of their putrid bodies and I would love to chop off their heads and stake them ALL on the White House lawn as a warning never to try their Bull and Camel Crap in America again! THIS IS OUR AMERICA FOR AMERICANS AND NO ONE ELSE.

    MODERATE MUSLIMS ARE ONLY MODERATE UNTIL THE IMAN SAYS JIHAD AND THEY WILL KILL OR BE KILLED WITH THE OTHERS! SO THERE IS NOT SUCH THING AS A MODERATE MUSLIM! ONLY A SNEAKY LIAR ALL THE GOOD MUSLIMS ARE NO LONGER MUSLIM!!!

    JC I love you and your thoughts! You are always right on the money! I LOVE the sound of NEWT and WEST … What a Team!!! ^_^ Warms my little heart to think of them as a team.

    Hugs and Love to you and yours!
    God Bless all our troopos, our Warrior Hero’s no matter where they are and their families for they are all hero’s to me. I Love P2V Pets 2 Vets and support them. They are in Virginia I believe and I am very happy to say that MA has started one of their own. It is in Quincy, MA and they are definitely WIN – WIN situations for everyone. Dogs Rule and we all know they are always Loyal and love us no matter what. They are ALWAYS TRUST WORTHY!!!! Unlike the infestation that has grown in our America but will be fumigated and removed from our Beloved America!!!

    GOD BLESS AMERICA AND ALL PATRIOTS AROUND THE WORLD. ….. …… … .. Amen.. … .. xoxo

    Hugs and Love xoxoxo

    • Shady,
      It’s far more sinister…This is not about black it’s about subjugation of the poor to keep all or as many as possible beholden to the plantation. There are a hell of a lot more white people on government assistance. J.C. Good to see you J.C.

  6. How Dare He be so Logical!!!

    I just looked it up:
    60% of Blacks are on welfare vs. 4% of the whites:

    http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TFPNA50LR3837M7MM

    However, that’s not the point. Obama and Holder USE the blacks and they fall for everything they say due to the Black Code — or they don’t want to set themselves apart….

    • I believe we were discussing numbers not percentages. Reminds me of the article I read in the news paper while up in San Francisco. The Author’s Headline. AIDs cases among heterosexual women not at risk doubled last year. Loving to play with statistical probability, but of course there were two cases the year before wow an epidemic. Yes Charlotte there are more people of the white persuasion on assistance on and receiving aid from the government. J.C.

  7. Regina McGlashen

    Upaces,
    you might have looked it up, as I did , from the link you provided, but I did not see the exact same thing. I guess it all depends on the part that you want to see, not see, or interpret it.
    ********************************************************
    http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TFPNA50LR3837M7MM
    Aid to black and Hispanic welfare recipients is greater in proportion to the size of their populations than is aid to white recipients. This can be seen by determining the average welfare expenditure per person for each ethnic group.
    Total means-tested welfare expenditures by federal and state governments amounted to roughly $384 billion in 1998. Of that sum,$212 billion–55 percent–went to white recipients. Some $105 billion–28 percent–went to black recipients, and $69 billion–17 percent–went to Hispanic recipients.

  8. Oh! Regina, Let me go look again then. brb

  9. I copied and will paste it here:

    At present, over 70 means-tested aid programs provide cash, food, housing, medical care, social services, and training to lower income persons in the United States. Among the largest

    programs are Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicaid, Food Stamps, and child nutrition programs.

    Total means-tested welfare expenditures by federal and state governments amounted to roughly $384 billion in 1998. Of that sum,$212 billion–55 percent–went to white recipients.

    Some $105 billion–28 percent–went to black recipients, and $69 billion–17 percent–went to Hispanic recipients.

    Aid to black and Hispanic welfare recipients is greater in proportion to the size of their populations than is aid to white recipients. This can be seen by determining the average welfare

    expenditure per person for each ethnic group.

    As a group, the 207 million white residents in the U.S. population receive $212 billion in benefits. As a group, then, they receive some $1,022 per person in welfare aid.

    There are some 30 million Hispanic residents in the U.S., and Hispanics as a group receive $69 billion in welfare, or roughly $2,210 per person. As a group, the 33 million black residents

    in the U.S. receive $105 billion in welfare aid, or roughly $3,230 per person.

    These figures represent the hypothetical amount each individual would receive if total welfare spending for each ethnic group were spread evenly among all members of that

    group. Consequently, the figures should not be interpreted to represent the aid actually received by persons on welfare–those numbers would be far higher.

    In addition, the per-capita figures should not be interpreted to mean the typical black or Hispanic welfare recipient receives higher welfare benefits than the typical white recipient.

    In fact, welfare aid per recipient would tend to be similar across all three ethnic groups.

    The per-capita welfare spending figures are higher for black recipients because the percentage of the total black population that receives welfare is greater than the percentage of the

    white population that receives welfare. The same is true for Hispanic recipients.

    The higher rates of welfare receipt among blacks and Hispanics are largely the result of the erosion of marriage among those groups. In 1998, 69.1 percent of black children were born

    outside of wedlock. Among Hispanics the number was 41.6 percent, while among non-Hispanic whites the number was 21.9 percent.

    http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TFPNA50LR3837M7MM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s