Rainforest Action Network Fabricates Levi’s Capitulation

Commentary by Jim Campbell

The Green Movement,  represents a horribly destructive lobbying network made who use pseudoscience and when unavailable  complete lies to put forth their agenda.  But of course those of the progressive movement believe them, they after all support the baseless contention that CO2 is associated with Global Warming  (Hoax debunked using up to date January data gathered by Forbes Magazine’ Larry Bell, an acknowledge climate expert) and that evil car drivers and manufacturers must pay for Al Gore’s delusions. 

It should come as little shock to those that follow their communist agenda that a  a recent report revealed that  Greenpeace and their green lackeys go on the offensive, their very own way, the facts don’t matter.

It is comforting to understand that Washington takes these folks seriously when they pander to these fools for their votes.  A safe bet would be since they have nothing more to do they are busily making their next moves on Occupy Wall Street. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

In last week’s newsletter, we expressed our outrage at Levi Strauss & Company for caving to the Rainforest Action Network. The story was originally reported by Mongabay and has now been found to be grossly inaccurate.  This should surprise no one.  The Consumers Alliance routinely highlights in its newsletters the green movement’s reputation for playing “fast and loose” with the truth when it comes to attacking private businesses.  I guess this shows that RAN is living up to the movement’s reputation.  Mongabay is either complicit, or willfully ignorant.

 

2012: The Year to End Green Greed

Over the last few months we have regularly highlighted the various campaigns being run by radical greens against job creators throughout the United States.  George Landrith of Frontiers of Freedom, and a member of the Consumers Alliance, has synthesized these insidious campaigns into a recent Washington Examiner opinion piece.  Landrith labels 2011 as the year “green campaigns killed thousands of jobs,” highlighting their efforts to halt the Keystone XL Pipeline, humiliate Gibson Guitar, and smear Mercury Paper.  Of all the campaigns, Landrith notes Greenpeace and WWF’s campaign against Mercury Paper, particularly because it destroyed “local jobs and families.”  Mercury took the chance and invested in Virginia.  But one national retailer and former customer the Cincinnati-based Kroger has demonstrated that they don’t care about job creators who fail to kowtow to an extremist environmental agenda.

So what of the poisonous green agenda in 2012?  Will it continue to undermine job creation efforts in as it did in 2011?  Thus far it’s not looking good.  Attempts to revive the Keystone XL Pipeline died earlier this week.  President Barack Obama was unapologetic during the State of the Union about using taxpayers’ money and command economics to push his green agenda.  As Landridth correctly points out, “time will tell what 2012 will mean for the radical green campaign against free enterprise in America.”  But 2012 doesn’t have to symbolize another victory for the greens.  Americans have suffered enough in the last few years without seeing out of town green activists tearing up economic opportunity and the reputations of job creators.  Free market activists and champions of liberty can launch their own counter offensive and stand up for the economic ideals that have made America great.

 

Advertisement