Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Obama: Sunni states should fight Islamic State because “that’s not what Islam is about”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Can the reader believe this guy on anything?

Sunni’s and Shia have always had a different beliefs on the source of the meaning of “The Real Islam,”  Thus they have been in frequent skirmishes since Islam’s inception.


It was not until Obama’s blundering and dithering that U.S. tanks and other armaments were left in Syria and Iraq as he placed his bets once again on the insurgents hoping they would topple Assad while leaving the same to the Iraqi Army who immediately abandoned their uniforms and posts, leaving all equipment for use by the Islamic State. 

Come on Obama, you are a Muslim, cut the nonsense with your disinformation.


It’s bad enough that those capable of rational believe nothing you say or stand for but why give them the more reasons to support the fact that you are a fool?

                                                 Without his teleprompter he would be mute.

Jihad Watch

Sep 6, 2014 

If Sunni states do take up arms against the Islamic State, it will not be because “that’s not what Islam is about,” but because it is not in the interests of states like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey to acknowledge a caliph and give up their sovereignty, and because significant elements of the populations of Egypt and Turkey don’t want to live under Islamic law, such that the governments of both states (despite Turkey’s not-so-secret support for the nascent caliphate) may find it in their interests to take down the Islamic State.

“Obama outlines strategy to ‘ultimately destroy’ Islamic State,” by Kathleen Hennessey, Los Angeles Times, September 5, 2014

The United States and its allies aim to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the militant group Islamic State, President Obama said Friday as he began to outline a U.S. strategy focused on gathering partners from Sunni Arab states and aiding fighters on the region’s front lines.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama says it was not his decision to withdraw troops from Iraq

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Yep, for sure and if only pigs could fly!



Suzanne Hamner does a masterful job in not just casting Obama as a pathological liar, a sociopathic  personality type who also lies and a psychopath.


 originalShe also delves into mythomania or psuedological fanstastica which means he lies and then makes more lies to cover the lies which he even believes.



It’s a fair diagnosis to be given to Hillary Clinton as well.

Jihad Watch

Aug 10, 2014 


Note how he says that if we still had troops on the ground in Iraq, they would increase his headaches, as they’d have to be reinforced. He doesn’t consider the possibility that if he had not left Iraq so precipitously and then boasted about doing so, the Islamic State might not exist today. This is not to say that the Iraq misadventure was any better conceived or better executed than the one in Afghanistan. It would never have been possible to establish a stable secular republic there. But there is no doubt that Obama’s weakness gave the jihadis an opportunity, and he took it. “Obama calls reporter’s question ‘BOGUS and WRONG,’ but his own words prove otherwise,” The Right Scoop, August 9, 2014:

In order to reassure the American people that he’s a NOT complete dithering fool, Obama held a press conference earlier today before going on vacation (again). The very last question he took got him in a  little huff and he rambled on and on about it until he finally called it an analysis that is “bogus and wrong.”…

This was the question: “Do you have any second thoughts about pulling all ground troops out of Iraq? Does it give you pause doing the same thing in Afghanistan?”

He tries to slither out of responsibility by blaming Iraq for not wanting U.S. troops there, conveniently neglecting that getting troops out of Iraq was one of his greatest campaign promises. As many on Twitter noted:


He specifically claimed that he kept that promise and now he’s saying it wasn’t his fault. So which is it?

The answer is – whichever is politically convenient at the time.


Continue reading

Obama raises concerns on growing casualties in call with Netanyahu

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Forgive me for temporarily taking leave of my senses, but Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should care one angstrom what Obama is concerned about?

Oh yes and take this one to the bank, Obama a well known psychopath is incapable of having any concern about anything, though he does an adequate job of faking it from time to time.



Perhaps a more appropriate response would be for Netyanhu to laugh in his face.

Jihad Watch

Jul 21, 2014 

Obama doesn’t seem to have made any reference to Hamas’s practice of staging operations from civilian areas in order to provoke retaliatory fire that would hurt civilians and could thus be used for propaganda purposes. He doesn’t appear to have mentioned the Hamas avowals that they use human shields. No, Obama subscribes to the mainstream media fiction that Israel takes insufficient care (at best) to minimize civilian casualties.

“Obama Raises Concerns On Growing Casualties In Call With Netanyahu,” by Mollie Reilly, Huffington Post, July 20, 2014

President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke Sunday about Israel’s ground operation in Gaza, the White House said in a statement.

According to the White House, Obama raised concerns about the number of casualties in recent days. As the New York Times reported, Sunday marked the deadliest day in the conflict so far, with 87 Palestinians and 13 Israeli soldiers killed.

“The President discussed Israel’s ongoing military operation, reiterated the United States’ condemnation of attacks by Hamas against Israel, and reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself,” the White House said. “The President also raised serious concern about the growing number of casualties, including increasing Palestinian civilian deaths in Gaza and the loss of Israeli soldiers.”

The president also said Secretary of State John Kerry would travel to Cairo, Egypt in order “to seek an immediate cessation of hostilities based on a return to the November 2012 ceasefire agreement.”

During the call, Netanyahu thanked Obama for his support.

Sunday’s call was the second between the two leaders in three days. During a Friday call, Obama urged Netanyahu to minimize civilian deaths.

“We’ve indicated although we support military efforts by the Israelis to make sure that rockets are not being fired into their territory, we also have said that our understanding is the current military ground operations are designed to deal with the tunnels,” Obama told reporters Friday. “And we are hopeful that Israel will continue to approach this process in a way that minimizes civilian casualties.”

Earlier Sunday, Kerry, apparently unaware that he was being recorded prior to an interview with Fox News, candidly expressed his exasperation with the growing number of casualties.
“It’s a hell of a pinpoint operation. It’s a hell of a pinpoint operation,” Kerry said to an off-camera aide. “We’ve got to get over there … I think, John, we ought to go tonight. I think it’s crazy to be sitting around.”

Netanyahu rejects Obama’s offer: Ceasefire “is not even on the agenda”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

How could Israel’s Prime Minister take anything Obama says seriously?


The rest of the world doesn’t, friend or foe and neither do we. 

Netanyahu  was ‘Humiliated’ by Obama Snub

Let’s not forget Obama refused to meet with Netanyahu in the oval office.

Jihad Watch

Jul 12, 2014 

netanyahu_obamaIt has been the pattern for decades now: whenever Israel starts to defend itself, the U.S. President tries to get it to stop. But now that Israel is dealing with a fanatically and consistently anti-Israel President, more and more Israelis (and pro-Israel Americans) are realizing that Israel is on its own against the jihadi onslaught. And so this time the President’s word doesn’t carry as much weight as it did in the past.

An update on this story. “Obama speaks with Netanyahu, offering to broker ceasefire with Hamas,” by Michael Wilner, Jerusalem Post, July 11, 2014:

VIENNA — The United States is prepared to facilitate a cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, US President Barack Obama told Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu by phone today.

In the call, Obama “reiterated the United States’ strong condemnation of continuing rocket fire into Israel by Hamas and other terrorist organizations in Gaza and reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself against these attacks,” the White House said in a readout of the conversation.

But Netanyahu has ruled out a ceasefire with Hamas in the short-term. On the contrary, the Israeli leader has vowed a series of additional stages to Operation Protective Edge— his government’s response to continued rocket fire on Israeli towns and cities, after Hamas, a terrorist organization, stockpiled tens of thousands of rockets in the coastal territory over the last several years.

A ceasefire is “not even on the agenda,” Netanyahu told members of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, just hours before his call with the US leader.

Obama also expressed concern, the press secretary’s office continued, “about the risk of further escalation and emphasized the need for all sides to do everything they can to protect the lives of civilians and restore calm.” ( A complete lode)

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Will this be America’s Last Independence Day?

Not with “Sparky” with his hands on the controls, no sir!
Why all the gloom and doom?  Republicans will gain control of the Senate in either 2014 or 2016, Obama will be gone, and most of his progressives in the house and senate with him. 

AF Vet’s America















Any questions?


Continue reading

State Dept. ignored warnings of Iranian efforts to destabilize Iraq

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Should we have planned on anything less with a Obama/Kerry State Department? 

Only Hillary could have done a better job of remaining in denial.

Jun 16, 2014 at 5:41pm 

Shakir WaheibThe Iranians aided Shi’ite militants and Sunni al-Qaeda forces against coalition forces in Iraq. And now the Obama Administration is seriously considering aiding the Iranians against Sunni jihadists. The incoherence of Obama foreign policy is staggering.


State Department counterterrorism officials warned in late April that Iran had “trained, funded, and provided guidance” to ethnic Iraqi terror groups bent on destabilizing the country.

The April warning appears to directly contradict and undermine comments last week by a State Department spokeswoman claiming that the United States and Iran have a “shared interest.”

As Iraqi militants continue to wage attacks and seize territory, the State Department has signaled that it is willing to work with neighboring Iran to stabilize the country. They have even raised the idea of discussing Iraq on the sidelines of the ongoing nuclear discussions taking place in Vienna.

However, the recent outreach to Iran runs counter to the State Department’s own Country Report on Terrorism issued just six weeks ago.

That report warned that Iran is building a terror network across the globe and that it was specifically seeking to undermine U.S. goals in Iraq by fostering terror groups on both sides of the ethnic Arab divide in Iraq.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama to free Gitmo terrorist ‘because he took up yoga’

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Obama will continue to pander to the anti-war faction of his party to little avail.


Currently there are no prisons in the U.S. capable of taking GITMO prisoners of war.

Should Obama some how use an executive order to close down GITMO it will come back and bite him in the ass by many members of his own party up for election. 

The New York Post

If you thought President Obama’s release of five top Taliban commanders in exchange for POW Bowe Bergdahl was bad, wait until you see what his Gitmo parole board plans.

Desperate to empty the Guantanamo Bay prison by the end of his term, Obama quietly is giving “get out of jail free” cards for the flimsiest of excuses.

One al Qaeda suspect captured in Afghanistan is considered reformed because he took up yoga and read a biography of the Dalai Lama. Another is eligible for release because of his “positive attitude.”

And one longtime detainee, a former bodyguard for Osama bin Laden, is now harmless because he’s going to start a “milk and honey farm.”

The Periodic Review Board already helped clear 78 of the remaining 149 prisoners for release, documents show, and has scheduled more hearings for this summer.

Many of these men were dubbed “forever prisoners” because of the threat they posed to the US — with intelligence officials warning that, if free, they would return to the jihad to kill Americans.

Based on past cases, that’s a good bet.

In a report on detainee recidivism, Obama’s own director of national intelligence this year documented that 178, or 29 percent, of the 614 prisoners already transferred from the prison have been confirmed to have, or are suspected of having, re-engaged in terrorism.

That means for every three freed from Gitmo, one has rejoined the war against us. Intelligence analysts admit their ability to track all former detainees is limited, so the recidivism rate may, in fact, be much higher.

One notorious recidivist, Abdullah Gulam Rasoul, became the Taliban’s operations commander in southern Afghanistan soon after his 2007 release from Gitmo. He was blamed for masterminding a surge in roadside attacks against American troops and organizing assaults on US aircraft in Afghanistan.

Another repeat terrorist is Said Ali al-Shihri, who after his 2007 release ran al Qaeda’s Yemeni branch and helped plan the deadly bombing of the US Embassy there.

Already, one of the five Taliban leaders freed last week in exchange for Bergdahl — Mullah Noorullah Noori — has pledged to return to fight Americans in Afghanistan.

Entire story below along with intelligence of the three most dangerous people on the planet still held there.

Continue reading

Is Michelle running for the Senate?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Several questions  immediately come to mind.

Could Mooch handle the step down from royalty and why in the world would she want to live in Chicago when she could become a baroness in a Detroit ghetto where she and what’s his name belong?

The White House Dossier

By Keith Koffler

June 5, 2014

michelle walking in“She be graceful”

First Lady Michelle Obama is everywhere. She’s traveling to China. She’s raising money for Democrats. She’s issuing plaintive tweets seeking the rescue of the kidnapped Nigerian girls.

She’s wading uncharacteristically deep into the Washington political mud pit to defend her school lunch program against Republicans, assailing them last Tuesday for opting to “play politics with our kids’ health.”

She struck a similar tone in a New York Times op-ed two days later, accusing Republicans of trying to “override science” and suggesting they join parents and “put our children’s interests first.”

So what’s with the bolder profile?

Sure,  Obama cares strongly about the things she is doing. That she does care in fact begs another question: Is caring all that’s going on here? Does she have political ambitions that would allow her to pursue an agenda while working to cement her husband’s legacy?

michelle -- nutriation factsSpeculation about a possible political future for Michelle Obama has naturally centered on the White House. But that’s the wrong place — at least for now.

Illinois has a Republican senator, Mark Kirk, and he is up for reelection in 2016. He’ll be formidable, particularly given his brave recovery from a stroke. But Illinois is a heavily Democratic state, and the race could be close.

No Illinois Democratic candidate would bring the star power and nationwide fundraising capacity that Obama would.

She has proven herself a superb speaker on behalf of her pet projects and is now a veteran campaigner for her husband. She’s also remained highly popular — even as the president’s ratings have plummeted.

She could represent the Democrats’ best chance to pick up a desperately needed — and winnable — seat. A December 2012 Public Policy Polling survey put her ahead of Kirk, 51 percent to 40 percent. Democratic leaders’ pressure on her to run  might get intense.

michelle in gardenBut the most acute pressure could come from within. Anyone who has listened to her speeches, particularly on the campaign trail, understands that she is a dedicated liberal, who believes unreservedly in the power of government to transform lives.

Obama views the battle between Republicans and Democrats as a struggle for the soul of the nation.

“Who are we?” she repeatedly asked while campaigning in 2012. She said the election result would affect the country “for decades.”

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Five New Hashtags for Michelle Obama

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Apparently Dr. Spencer was being kind, he forgot the most important # of al.

#Wide Load (brakes frequently to eat junk food)#

May 25, 2014 


Over at PJ Media I offer my contribution to the New Diplomatic Style:

Michelle Obama’s #BringBackOurGirls hashtag, although taken up among the glitterati, has been ridiculed as emblematic of her husband’s weakness and lack of will in the face of Islamic jihad.

This is, however, unfair not only to Mrs. Obama, but to Sylvester Stallone, Harrison Ford, Wesley Snipes, Mel Gibson and the other noted human rights activists who have endorsed this campaign.

After all, it is not the only Obama administration response to the kidnapping, forcible conversion to Islam, and sex slavery of these girls (in accord with Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50, etc.).

The administration has now announced that it is sending U.S. troops to help find these girls. Eighty troops. To Chad.

I am not in favor of Wilsonian “nation-building” military adventures in Muslim countries with no tradition of or desire for a pluralistic society that accords equal rights to women and non-Muslims, or for republican rule that would approve laws other than those mandated by Allah in the Qur’an and Sunnah.

However, it would be hard to oppose an all-out effort directed toward eradicating Boko Haram – that is, the Party of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad – from the face of the earth.

That, of course, is not what Obama is doing. He is sending a tiny number of troops to a country the girls are not in, so as to engage in aerial reconnaissance to try to find them.

But what does a kidnapped schoolgirl who has been forcibly converted to Islam and married to a jihadist look like from the air? U.S. officials know that these girls have been dispersed, which only emphasizes that this initiative is more about style than substance – just like Michelle’s hashtag campaign.

But if that’s what U.S. diplomacy looks like in the Obamanation, then let’s make the most of it. Here are six more hashtags that Michelle (and Rocky, and Han Solo, and Nino Brown) can use to declare their righteous indignation before the world:…

2. #StopHatingJews
Muhammad Badie, the Muslim Brotherhood’s general guide, had his day in court in Egypt last week, and strongly rejected charges that the Brotherhood had committed acts of violence against the Egyptian people. “

We have fought only against the Jews,” Badie declared, “and Kamel Al-Sharif may testify about the conduct of the Muslim Brotherhood in the [1948] war in Palestine. We fought against the Jews. The Israeli strategic research institute wrote in a report: ‘Our greatest enemies in the world are the Muslim Brotherhood.’ This is an honor for us, yet now we are being accused of conspiring with Hamas against the Egyptian people. This is an absolute lie.”

The idea that Badie would think that the Brotherhood’s making war against “the Jews” (not “the Israelis”) would be an exonerating factor, and that his accusers would take it as such, shows the depth and breadth of Islamic antisemitism.

That is not surprising, considering that the Qur’an designates the Jews as “the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers” (5:82), but it certainly militates against the “peace process” that Michelle’s husband has been so ardently pushing, heedless of Palestinian intransigence, unilateralism, and taste for genocidal rhetoric.

Surely a well-worded hashtag would devastate Badie and other Islamic antisemites, and more than do the trick here.

1. #Don’tBoastOfConqueringUs

Recently video surfaced of Islamic jihadists from various countries fighting in Iraq as part of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Quoting the Qur’an and chanting “Allahu akbar,” they declared “to the tyrants and infidels wherever they may be”:

“We say to you, as the Prophet Muhammad said: ‘We have brought slaughter upon you.’” Chanting, “We are Muslims! We are Muslims!,” they burned their passports – after one brandished a sword and exclaimed: “Know this, oh infidels: By Allah, we shall cleanse the Arabian Peninsula of you, you filth. We shall conquer Jerusalem from you, oh Jews! We shall conquer Rome and Andalusia, Allah willing.”

This declaration of Islamic conquest and slaughter flies in the face of the understanding of Islam as benign, tolerant and pluralistic that we must accept in the U.S. on pain of charges of “bigotry” and “Islamophobia.”

They will conquer Jerusalem, Rome, and Spain, will they? Not if our hashtags have anything to say about it!

I shudder to think of the embarrassment and shame these jihadis will feel when they consult their Twitter feeds.

Continue reading