The U.S. needs a revolution–that is our only way back

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Patriot and Oath Keeper

There can be little doubt that the Obama Administration is the biggest thugocracy in recorded presidential history.

 

 

 

A revolution has an amazing way of cleaning up the gene pool.

 

Dr. Roth’s comments may be a bit premature in that in all likelihood this administration will go down over the cover ups of Gun Walker and Benghazi.

 

 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

 

 

By Laurie Roth

The problem

We have a problem, Houston. We have a president who long before he was elected declared his plans to transform America and change us. Over 50% of us were stuck on “hypnotized stupid” – “the first black president” – “the next Martin Luther King or Kennedy” – “sick of Bush and the Iraq war” – bored and just wanted entertainment.” Over half the country entered the “Obama holodeck,” and when the door slammed behind them, they found it was hell and very hot.

Before Obama was elected

Obama warned that he would attack the energy industry – oil and coal for starters. He said he dreamed of $4.00 a gallon gas. At the time, we were floating between $1 and $2 for gas. Going up to $4 or $5 seemed absurd, let alone a president wanting us to pay that! Well, he did want that and we do pay that and more now. Obama must be drooling with excitement.

Obama started bypassing Congress immediately with endless executive orders. He hired the most controversial and questionable czars he could find, running endless government departments answering only to Obama. Through his czars, he has placed endless controls, regulations, and tax tentacles everywhere. (Entire Article)

Obama’s transformation plans attacked the greatest healthcare system on earth, turning it into an imploding, taxed, and putrid nightmare for all. Lines, taxes, threats…those are just three descriptions of our healthcare meal in front of us now.

He led in passing the NDAA bill, turning US troops on Americans, and whisking us off to an undisclosed detainment camp without being read Miranda rights. The list of violations on the people is endless. Drones flying overhead in the U.S., attacks on the 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment, 10th Amendment…spirit and core of ALL AMENDMENTS TO OUR CONSTITUTION.

Who is Obama – what do we know? Complete article below.

SO WHAT IS AN ‘ASSAULT RIFLE’ REALLY? WE LOOK AT THE DEFINITIONS AND HOW THE TERM IS ‘DEMONIZED’

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

By now if you haven’t figured out that the media and politicians like Dianne Feinstein are playing a shell game on you when they use the term assault rifle to confuse you with weapons of war. 

This is a great article appearing in The Blaze that will make the reader quite conversant on the difference.  

Sadly we keep electing ignorant peoples with an agenda to be our rulers.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message. 

“Make a promise to yourself that you will stop calling rifles ‘assault weapons.’”

That’s what Glenn Beck said on his morning radio show Thursday as he discussed AR-15s. But why? Is an AR-15 not an assault rifle? Does the “AR” in AR-15 not stand for “assault rifle”?

A man with an AR-15, which is a semi-automatic rifle allowed for civilian ownership. (Photo: Shutterstock.com)

A man with an AR-15, which is a semi-automatic rifle allowed for civilian ownership. (Photo: Shutterstock.com)

It doesn’t. In fact, it doesn’t mean “automatic rifle” either, as many might think. AR actually stands for ArmaLite rifle, which is the company that first developed it in the 1950s.

It seems that there is a lot of confusion as to the difference between military rifles and those designed for civilian ownership, especially because of the language often used to describe the latter. The most popular terms to describe the weapons at the center of the recent gun control debate are “military-style” and “assault.” These words have long been used to to describe civilian firearms like the AR-15, but some consider it an inappropriate association that is deliberately being made to “demonize” the guns. (Complete article below.)

John Kerry: Obama’s “Perfect Choice” For Secretary of State

 

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

The only thing perfect about John Kerry as a nominee for Secretary of State is like Obama he is a perfect fraud and has consistently put the position of United States interests behind that of the enemy.

John Kerry and Jane Fonda should still be prosecuted for treason.

Kerry & Fonda: a history of their role in the “anti-war” movement

 For the record, The United States DID NOT LOSE the war in Vietnam.

Gutless antiwar members of congress like John Kerry, cut funding while hoisting the white flag. Credit must also given to Uncle Walter for his anti-war broadcasts on the CBS Evening News.

“July 17, 1971 – Following a month-long speaking tour of the Soviet
Union and other countries,six VVAW and CCI members meet with PRG
representatives in Paris to show support for the communist peace plan.

July 20, 1971 — Leaders of the VVAW hold a staff meeting. They agree
to use the designations favored by North Vietnam (Democratic Republic
of Vietnam) and the Vietcong (Provisional Revolutionary Government)
for future press releases, decide to remove all American flags from
VVAW offices, and discuss how best to handle Al Hubbard’s planned
trip to Hanoi.

July 24, 1971 – The Daily World features a photograph of John Kerry
speaking in support of the Provisional Revolutionary Government
(Vietcong) Seven Point Plan.   (At the time, John Kerry was still in the United States Navy.)

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Front Page Magazine

By John Perazzo

When Barack Obama nominated John Kerry to be America’s next Secretary of State Friday afternoon, he called Kerry the “perfect choice” to replace Hillary Clinton. Stating that “few individuals … grasp our foreign policies as firmly as John Kerry,” Obama said the Senator will not “need a lot of on-the-job training.”

He then praised Mr. Kerry’s combat service in the Vietnam War and his subsequent tenure of service in the Senate, where Kerry has been intimately involved in “every major foreign policy debate for the past 30 years.”

Notably, President Obama made no mention of what occurred after Kerry’s military service and before his political career. Perhaps this is because what Kerry did during that time would be difficult even for an adroit wordsmith like Obama to summarize with just a pithy phrase or two of adulation. (more below)

Obama cleaning house? Obama Administration Replaces Top Generals Following Benghazi Disaster

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

As this story continues to unfold, there is no possible way for Obama and his minions to silence General Carter Ham.

General Carter Ham

Sure enough Obama nominated Gen. David Rodriguez to replace Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command.
The Stars and Stripes reported:

President Barack Obama will nominate Army Gen. David Rodriguez to succeed Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command and Marine Lt. Gen. John Paxton to succeed Gen. Joseph Dunford as assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Thursday.

Short of killing him, General Ham will become the ultimate whistle blower

Just because his commander-in-chief had an unknown agenda, he knew what his job was, to save as many U.S. citizens as possible. It’s called duty, honor, country. 

Obama would never comprehend that because he’s not from around here.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Posted by Jim Hoft

Owner Instapundit

The latest rumor making the rounds is that Barack Obama replaced General Carter Ham at Africom after the general made a move to help the US security officials at the Benghazi consulate and annex. Ham was replaced by Gen. David Rodriquez on October 18. Complete article below:

Psychologists blacklist conservative colleagues

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

Thank goodness U.S. Taxpayer dollars were not spent on a study that spelled out the obvious.

When It comes to the sciences, soft, like sociology, psychology, anthropology, etc., If you are paying for your kids education and you have any control over the curriculum they choose,  steer them toward the hard sciences, physics, mathematics, chemistry, medicine or geology, and two things will happen.

Get “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness,” in which Dr. Lyle Rossiter explains why modern liberals think and act as they do.

Those receiving a degree in the hard sciences are far more likely to find employment even in this environment, while those “educated” in the soft sciences are likely to be the future socialist’s in America, judging people as the study below implies.

 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it and I approve this message.

WND Exclusive

By Bob Unruh

A recent study by Tilburg University is gaining attention for its stunning conclusion that among psychologists, conservatives have reason to fear negative consequences should their political beliefs be revealed.

“In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists admit that they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues,” the authors, Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammers, wrote.

“The more liberal respondents are, the more willing they are to discriminate.”

The study was done by the two members of the Department of Social Psychology at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. They warned specifically that conservatives who fear harm if their colleagues discover their leanings “are right to do so.”

The results got the attention of the U.S.-based Alliance Defending Freedom, which runs a Center for Academic Freedom. There, Travis C. Barham, litigation staff counsel, noted the results “should come as a disappointment to those who think that we should – in the words of Thomas Jefferson – ‘follow the truth wherever it may lead.’”

Think twice before jumping on gold’s bandwagon

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

The title to this article read like an oh, oh article for gold bugs. Factually it doesn’t seem to be.

Those interested in gold might consider, buying rare gold coins. The analogy goes, if the price of paint falls and you are the owner of a Rembrandt will your painting go down in value?  Not likely, they have two things in common paint. and nothing more.

Adam is the owner of Monaco Financial, my agent is Dan Duquette, I’ve been with him for 3 years he has treated me very well.  He is always helping me get pieces that have resale value that I can trade up for higher quality coins. 

I enjoy collecting rare double eagles.  Each coin has a historical background as it pertains to happenings in the United States when the coins were struck.

If this appeals to you, give him a call at 1-888-751-1933 X4526.  Dan has been collecting coins since he was a kid and seems to have close to a photographic memory regarding the history of any given coin.

Market Watch

By Myra P. Saefong,

Reuters

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Major investors have added to their stakes in physically backed gold exchange-traded funds and central banks have bought the metal at a record pace, good signs that gold’s about to break out of its recent trading range, but not necessarily indicative of a major rally .

“Too many gold bulls are hanging their hat” on quantitative easing (QE) from either the U.S. Federal Reserve or European Central Bank, said Ed Bugos, director of mining finance at Precious Metals Equity Research.

That mentality is particularly worrisome given the uncertainty surrounding further QE, which helps stimulate the economy, devalue currencies and raise gold’s safe-haven appeal.  Complete article below: