Tag Archives: gun control

God Bless the women of Texas

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Why do the states with the strictest anti gun legislation have the most gun related homicides and acts of violence?  Perhaps the girls of Texas know why.

The great state of Texas is known for many things, their six flags, the Alamo, a great job environment and  a business savvy Governor, Rick Perry.


They also have some of the most beautiful woman in the country.

Drinking with a TEXAS Girl.

A Mexican, an Arab, and a TEXAS  girl are in the same bar.
When the  Mexican finishes his beer, he throws his glass in the air, pulls out his pistol, and shoots the glass  to pieces.
He says, ‘In Mexico , our glasses are so cheap we don’t  need to drink with the same one twice.’
The  Arab, obviously impressed by this, drinks non-alcohol beer (cuz he’s am ARAB.
But of course no concern about where the bullets would come down.
Muslim!), throws it into the air, pulls out his AK-47, and shoots the glass to pieces. He says, ‘In the Arab World, we have so much sand to make glasses that we don’t need to drink with the same one twice either.’
578078_4764643869081_805027102_nThe TEXAS  girl, cool as a cucumber, picks up her beer, downs it in one gulp, throws the glass into the air, whips out her 45, and shoots the Mexican and the Arab.
Catching her glass, setting it on the bar, and  calling for a refill, she says, ‘In TEXAS we have so many illegal aliens that we don’t have to drink with the same ones twice.’
God Bless TEXAS    
Cheering for the Texas Gun Float at annual parade.

Continue reading

Hillary: On guns, “We’re way out of balance”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Should someone who has been alleged to have brain damage be in a position to destroy the Second Amendment?

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Think about it, just Google pictures of Hillary Clinton and you will find “NO Pictures with the exception of the “Coke Bottle” jobs she is wearing above.

Brain damage or no brain damage, the last thing We the People need is another Marxist and her deviant husband living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 


Readers  may wonder with what justification do I refer to Hillary as a Marxist? Looked nofurther than her plans for the failed “Hillary Care” which resulted in the House of Representatives being voted in with a Republican majority, the first time in 45 years.

The Daily Caller

The NRA has always supported laws prohibiting violent felons and certain other categories of potentially dangerous persons from possessing guns, and it’s a position we’re confident is shared by the vast majority of gun owners nationwide.

Nevertheless, on Tuesday, Hillary Clinton, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, said, “I think that we’ve got to rein in what has become an almost article of faith that anybody can have a gun anywhere, anytime.”

Clinton also said that when it comes to guns, “I think again we’re way out of balance, and I don’t believe that is in the best interest of the vast majority of people.” As if quoting from the playbook of 2008 presidential candidate Barack Obama, she added, “I think you can say that and still support the right of people to own guns.”

(Another left-wing nut job believing herself to be smarter than our “Founding Fathers,”)

For the record, gun ownership “supporter” Clinton has previously supported banning “assault weapons,” supported gun owner licensing and gun registration, opposed legislation prohibiting the confiscation of firearms during emergencies, and opposed legislation prohibiting lawsuits seeking to hold the firearm industry financially liable for harm caused by criminals who use guns.

What’s this? George going to bat for Hillary?  Why not they are both cut from the same cloth.



Entire article below.

Continue reading

As November disaster looms, Dems forming circular firing squad

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

With the brand of progressive/socialist currently running roughshod over the U.S. Constitution and all American Citizens, you knew this was going to happen.


Their lust for power and perks runs so deeply that they would eat their young to ensure they won another election.

I for one have had it with these incompetent assholes, how about you?


The American Thinker

Thomas Lifson
April 1, 2014

The standard MSM trope is that the GOP is riven by conflict, but even they are beginning to notice Democrats turning against one another.

There is going to be hell to pay for the Democrats in November. Having rammed through a disastrous transformation of health care, a lot of congressional Democrats and many more down the ticket suspect that voters will vent their anger at the party that foisted the travesty on us.

As the old saying goes, “Success has a thousand fathers and failure is an orphan.” So Democrats are scrambling to make sure that their backs are protected when Demageddon happens. Against this dynamic, a variety of issues are being contested. Two analysts today lay out the fault lines. Michael Barone:  

Now in the sixth year of the Obama presidency, with his job approval stuck below 50 percent, there are signs of strain. And choices made earlier, when Democrats held congressional supermajorities, are starting to prove troublesome.

One choice was to not bring forward immigration legislation that would provide a path to legalization for immigrants in the country unlawfully. This was a top priority for the Hispanic Caucus, but Obama and Democratic congressional leaders chose not to advance an issue that would cost them the support of some Democrats and require Republican votes.

During the 2012 campaign, this caused Obama few problems, except for some pointed questions in a Univision interview. But the president’s job approval among Hispanics plummeted 23 points in 2013, according to Gallup — more than any other demographic group.

And it may be plummeting even more. Hispanics are more likely than average to lack health insurance, and Obamacare was supposed to help. But, with a Spanish language website non-functional for two months, few uninsured Hispanics seem to have signed up, and the latest Pew Research Center poll shows Obamacare approval among Hispanics down to 47 percent.

There is also tension on greenie front:

One issue the Obama Democrats put ahead of immigration was global warming. In June 2009, Nancy Pelosi’s House passed a cap-and-trade bill. That had political costs — it was a career-ender for many Blue Dog Democrats — and the issue never reached the Senate floor even when there were 60 Democrats there.

But it was a top priority for green gentry liberals. Green in their concern for the environment — and green in terms of money. This year, San Francisco hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer pledged to spend $100 million to elect candidates opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline.

See the entire article below.

Continue reading

Glock Releases New Pro-Gun Commercial That’s Sure to Make Gun Owners Smile

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The advertisements from Glock below are great.


When widely viewed they just may put a different angle of the use of weapons for self-protection that the mainstream and zealots and our “government,” choose to ignore. 

NOTE: Not a single shot was fired.

The Blaze


In 2011, there was a set of commercials that made their way around the internet by gun-maker Glock and featuring popular Marine drill sergeant Lee Ermey, aka “Gunny.”  Pro-gun people loved them, as they make the case for those who are passionate about the Second Amendment in a slightly-funny, common-sense way.

And now the manufacturer is back with a new one that’s sure to grab attention.

The ads all are a play off the idea of robbers picking the wrong business, house, or person.


Check out the initial ad, which takes place at a diner and focuses on a potential robbery:

The second one focuses on home protection:

And now the new one — which portrays a crook picking the wrong woman to try to attack:

Continue reading

Obama Administration’s Two Quiet New Executive Actions on Who Can Buy a Gun

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

obamacare-police-state-obama-liar-antichristThe only thing Obama does well.

Is their no federal law that Obama is not willing to attempt to overturn?

All this invasion of privacy because of the ignorance on the lefts lack of understanding of the Second Amendment?


Under ‘The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability” Act, or HIPPA, which protects medical privacy.

If Obama and his henchmen are not brought to heel on this specific law, we can say good bye to doctor patient confidentially.  Of course NSA probably already has our records, they don’t have much to do these days.

The Blaze, Jan. 3, 2014  Fred Lucas

After failing to strengthen background checks on gun buyers through Congress, the Obama administration on Friday announced pending executive action on the matter focused mainly on mental health issues that would allow the government to get around certain privacy laws on the books in order to obtain more information.

Obama Administrations Two Quiet New Executive Actions on Who Can Buy a Gun

Photo: AP

The new restrictions would take the form of regulations from the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services.

One of the regulations would seek to gain information previously withheld because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPPA, which protects medical privacy.

“Too many Americans have been severely injured or lost their lives as a result of gun violence,” a White House release said Friday.

“While the vast majority of Americans who experience a mental illness are not violent, in some cases when persons with a mental illness do not receive the treatment they need, the result can be tragedies such as homicide or suicide.”

The administration’s Friday post-holiday announcement came while President Barack Obama was still on vacation in Hawaii, in stark contrast to Obama’s first executive actions on guns, which were announced in a White House ceremony.

“Friday news dump” announcements have also traditionally been used to try to avoid media scrutiny.

 Entire article below.

The Three Most Important Ongoing Second Amendment Cases


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It’s a safe be that Supreme Court Justices Kagan and Sotomayor will vote against two of these cases as the both lied during their senate confirmation hearings.

elena_kagan_sonia_sotomayorElana Kagan & Silvia Sotomayor

When asked about their position on the Second Amendment both said that Heller was case-law and they would not vote to  change it. 

You think Kagan isn’t in the tank with the Obama Agenda?

Check the video below.  (Second part)

At their first opportunity they changed their minds and voted with the anti-gunners, thus adjudicating from the bench and making their confirmation hearings a mockery.  


Drake v. Filko is one of the most important cases they will decide.  Basically in their cert, the plaintiffs ask the Supreme Court to decide if the 2nd Amendment is assaulted by not allowing legal hand gun owners to carry their hand guns outside their homes.  

In a nutshell, have prior attacks on the Second Amendment rendered it as useless as saying one can own a baseball bat but never bring it to the ball park.

Reason Magazine

Addressing who can own guns, where they can carry them, and whether guns can be transported to a second home.

Since the 2010 Supreme Court case McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the ruling in the 2008 Heller case (which said the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms) to states and localities, the Court has so far evaded any new case about the limits and meaning of the Second Amendment

See entire article below.

Continue reading

DOJ internal memo confirms Obama plan for gun confiscation


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, and Patriot.

It’s really quite simple, the forces of tyranny never give up.

An internal memo within the Department of Justice (DOJ) has surfaced which confirms that the Obama administration had plans for gun registration and confiscation in the aftermath of the Newtown school shooting.

According to Bob Owens, the NRA obtained the memo in February. But apparently there were questions as to the veracity of the information. Owens says that the existence of the memo, and its outline of a plan for gun registration and confiscation, can now be confirmed.

The document, which can be viewed here, was not released to the public via the news media.

Owens cites an analysis of the memo, including direct quotes from the document, which exposes the Obama administration’s real agenda on guns:

The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.

Thus, despite the many denials by Obama, by members of his administration, and by Congressional Democrats, once again it has become clear that the administration’s true agenda is very different from that which is presented to the public.

The goal is and always has been gun registration and confiscation.

The Examiner has often reported the Obama agenda on guns, which can be traced all the way back to his years in the Illinois legislature. He was considered among the most aggressive anti-gun advocates in Illinois.

Obama voted to criminalize any homeowner who used an illegal firearm to defend himself and/or his family in the event of a home invasion by dangerous criminals.

The philosophy that underlies such a point of view is clear. To Obama it is more important that a gun be “legal” than for human lives to be saved. This stance portrays a shocking disregard for the sanctity of human life.

Thus, many conservatives warned as far back as 2007 that an Obama candidacy for the presidency would be a very dangerous turn for America. Obama would never tell the public just how radical he is. To do so would end his political career.

This is why Obama denied repeatedly that he had been close friends with murderous homegrown terrorists such as Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn. The couple bombed federal buildings, encouraged teenagers to murder their parents, and were arrested for the murder of a police officer but were released on a technicality.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Archie Bunker on Democrats


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Archie, played by Caroll O’Conner was in fact what we call today’s conservative, while Reiner is just as liberal and likely more so than he was during the series.

I know about O”Conner’s political leanings because he was in the same national fraternity that I belong to and I read about him in our quarterly journal.

Makes me wonder how they got along on the set. 

Can you believe it, back in the late 60’s and early 70’s I was about as liberal  as meat head played by Rob Rreiner in “All in the family,” which ran for 8 years, from 1971-79.

Archie was classified by the producer, Norman Lear as a working class bigot, when in fact he was  clairvoyant , predicting the events of today.

Continue reading

How LIBERALS see the situation!


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Ever attempt to have a fact based conversation with a liberal?  Of course it’s impossible. 

0423-american-jihadism.jpg_full_600Boston Marathon Marathon Muslim Jihadists

There is no point in discussing anything with the brain washed delusional.

Thanks to my fraternity brother Dave, I could not have said this one better myself.

These two, short sentences tell you a lot about our liberal government and the media.

“We are told NOT TO  judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics.”

“We are encouraged TO  judge ALL Gun Owners by the
actions of a few lunatics.”

james_2285578bColorado Springs shooter James Holmes

They also have the dopy notion that gun free zones are safer despite evidence pointing to the contrary. 


Yep safer for those that come with guns to murder.

Funny how that works…

Continue reading