Obama Invites 80,000 Muslim Immigrants Into the United States – Promises 100,000/Per Year for Next 5 Years

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

We have been repeatedly told how brilliant Obama is. I doubt that but certainly understand he clearly knows what he is doing in the pursuit of destroying America’s economy, its culture and standing in the world.

Obama hate America and among many Americans the feeling is entirely mutual.

Sharia Unveiled

Tater  just reminded me of this last night.  This story originates from October 2010.  and I thought it would be a great story to publish again.

As he wrote, “Barack Obama has now authorized a huge influx of Muslims into the United States to break the conservative movement and to overwhelm the system and the Constitution,” and he’s absolutely correct,

President Barack Hussein Obama has invited  80,000 Muslims to immigrate next year to the United States. He is doing this by executive order.  Additionally, he has promised to bring a minimum of 100,000 additional muslims per year, for the next 5 years.

Defeating the West by the womb.

“Obama authorizes additional 80,000 “refugees” to entry country.”

By Dr. Paul L. Williams  Friday, October 22, 2010

President Barack Hussein Obama, in a determination letter to Congress, has announced that he will allow an additional 80,000 immigrants – – mostly from Islamic countries – – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011.

Mr. Obama says that the increase in Muslim immigrants “is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.” More…

The Real Meaning Of The Term ‘Islamist’

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Some may not agree completely with the explanation below. In fact a year ago I would have taken exception.

Mecca

It was from further study and talking in Muslims as well as those converting to Christianity that the position put forth seems well-reasoned to me. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

The Investigative Project on Terrorism

Detroit Jewish News

The AP Stylebook, the authority on usage style for most U.S. newspapers and TV networks, defines “Islamists,” perhaps the most contentious word today, as Muslims who view the Qur’an as a “political model.”

These Muslims range from “mainstream politicians” to “militants known as jihadi.”

Islamist in this political context is thus distinctive from Muslim, a religious term referring to followers of Islam.

In the very political world of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the term Islamist is considered the province of “Islam-bashers” who hate Islam, but don’t want to be too blatant.

CAIR Islam’s Pravda

Steve Emerson’s respected Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) describes Washington-based CAIR as “the nation’s most visible Islamist group.” So it’s obvious why CAIR is recoiling over its image and has gone so far as to try to insert “Islamophobia” in conversational English.

IPT asserts that CAIR believes popular use of that term would provide an out for attacks on Muslims who have hijacked their religion for political or even terrorist gain.

Clearly, the politics of Islamists have no place in the religious sphere of Muslims.

Says Emerson in a January online post:

“Plenty of practicing Muslims work bravely in opposition to Islamist ideology.” He cites Great Britain’s Quilliam Foundation — “started
by Muslims who walked away from radical Islamist thought and now counter the arguments Islamists offer.” The Foundation contends Muslims must embrace “a more self-critical approach.”

A Real Islam Policy for a Real America

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

This seems on its face to be a perfect plan and oh if it could be implemented.

Sadly the ACLU would intervene just as we intervene in the countries of the Middle East and Africa when our politicians concoct reasons for a United States Military presence.

As Jihadist’s have made remarkable head way due primarily to a woeful U.S. foreign policy in the area.   Despite what is being said, our military will remain in the area for quite some time. 

Factually, planes, helicopters drones, tanks, RPG’s and all of our equipment works better when used in the sand rather than the streets of New York, San Francisco, or Dallas. 

That’s my story and I sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Here is the speech, edited and polished, that I gave at the Preserving Western Civilization conference in February.

 

A REAL ISLAM POLICY FOR A REAL AMERICA

by Lawrence Auster
Preserving Western Civilization Conference
Baltimore, Maryland
February 8, 2009

To deal with the crisis facing our civilization, we must be both realistic and imaginative. The realism part consists in recognizing how bad our situation is. The entire Western world is at present under the grip of the modern liberal ideology that targets every normal and familiar aspect of human life, and our entire historical way of being as a society.

The key to this liberal ideology is the belief in tolerance or non-discrimination as the ruling principle of society, the principle to which all other principles must yield. We see this belief at work in every area of modern life. The principle of non-discrimination must, if followed consistently, destroy every human society and institution.

A society that cannot discriminate between itself and other societies will go out of existence, just as an elm tree that cannot discriminate between itself and a linden tree must go out of existence. To be, we must be able to say that we are us, which means that we are different from others. If we are not allowed to distinguish between ourselves and Muslims, if we must open ourselves to everyone and everything in the world that is different from us, and if the more different and threatening the Other is, the more we must open ourselves to it, then we go out of existence. Complete proclamation below.

Did Obama Just Lie To Israel Again?

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

Obama is a pathological narcissistic liar.  He does not tell the truth.

The Muslim appeaser has placed the Muslim Brotherhood and Morsi, Egypt’s president in the land of the Nile where these ignorant fools want to destroy the ancient pyramids. 

Way to go Obama Allah would be proud. 

By Doug Book

The Coach is Right

Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi should be forever beholding to Barack Hussein Obama. After all, Obama’s calculated ouster of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarek gave Morsi the job of ruling the Middle East’s most populous nation. And ruling is the right word as Morsi has granted himself both dictatorial power and immunity from prosecution by Egypt’s courts.

When has Obama ever told the truth?

Is the Gaza cease fire agreed to by Benjamin Netanyahu based on a lie told to the PM by Barack Obama?

Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi should be forever beholding to Barack Hussein Obama. After all, Obama’s calculated ouster of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarek gave Morsi the job of ruling the Middle East’s most populous nation. And ruling is the right word as Morsi has granted himself both dictatorial power and immunity from prosecution by Egypt’s courts.

I “may take the necessary actions and measures to protect the country and the goals of the revolution,” writes the Egyptian president in Article 6 of his power grab decree. Morsi also becomes the “Sovereign of the State” who can “claim exception against all rules.”  (There exists a similar situation in the United States, though it has yet to be put in writing.) (entire article below)

Peaceful Coexistence with Radical Islamists is Impossible

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

Radical Islam did not exist when the third world sand pits were ruled by the Ottoman Empire. Since 1354 the Ottoman Turks had been advancing westwards, overrunning Constantinople (and renaming it Istanbul) in 1453.

Thus,gaining control of the Black Sea and the main routes to the Balkans and driving on to the eastern Adriatic.

Owing to the exploits of successive Sultans, the Ottomans were, by 1520, the undisputed leaders of the Muslim world.

Through intentional neglect of the Muslim population, infant mortality was high, radicalism didn’t rear its ugly head until the area was managed by the West in their pursuit of oil with the mistaken idea that Muslims could be ruled using a Western style democracy. 

Clearly that didn’t work so well.  Then in 1928 with the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood, a new player entered the arena with the expressed vision  having one law,   using Jihad as the way, the will of Allah, thus subjugating the U.S. Constitution will be accomplished ushering in a single Caliphate

Neil Snyder

The American Thinker

The landscape in the Middle East and North Africa has been in a state of radical flux since the beginning of the Arab Spring in December 2010.  The term “Arab Spring” is a misnomer, though.  In reality, it is a progressive revolution throughout the Arab world that so far has brought down governments in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen and resulted in the rise to prominence of Islamists in every country where it has taken hold.

The Arab Spring is far from over.  Syria’s civil war and the growing protest movement in Jordan are offshoots of the Arab Spring that in due course will almost certainly bring down Syrian President Bashar al Assad and could lead to the toppling of Jordan’s King Abdullah.  Other countries in the region including Algeria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), for example, are experiencing their versions of the Arab Spring as well.  Time will tell where they end up, but if they follow suit, they may morph into Islamist states. Complete article below.

Big shocker: Benghazi scandal fades from news

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

This is a perfect fit for the author’s Face Book group, Media Cover Ups and Government Lies. 

This administration and their command over the media is as predictable as the sun setting in the west.

Will We the People ever know?

The Benghazi story becomes too radioactive and it is forgotten by the media. So much for answers for the family of those murdered.

So much for a spineless congress that will not do its job. 

Even Fox News has been quiet the past week until today, when  Thomas Ricks, a veteran newspaper reporter and author of “The Generals,”  was brought on for an interview said, “I think that the emphasis on Benghazi has been extremely political, partly because Fox was operating as a wing of the Republican Party.” 

This was reported by the Washington Post in the article, “Fox News interview ends after author accuses network of being wing of the Republican Party.”

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

The Examiner

Anthony Martin

In the weeks since the 2012 presidential election, the Benghazi scandal has faded from coverage as a news story in the mainstream media. With all of the current focus being on the so-called “fiscal cliff,” news outlets now have a good excuse for keeping the scandal off of the front pages of publications and out of sight entirely on network television’s evening news shows.

Former CIA Director David Petraeus is whisked into Congress to give secret testimony on Benghazi. Many believe a series of public hearings with Petraeus is necessary.

Credits: (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

As of today it has been fully a week since any major story appeared in mainstream outlets concerning the Benghazi massacre. (complete story below)