‘Whose Side Are You On?’ Columbine Survivor Blasts Obama

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The article below appeared in the “Political Outcast,” online website. 

In his letter below, Evan Todd nails Obama for being a complete fraud, not surprisingly his comments are not put forth by the media.

If American voters weren’t so ignorant and would take 15 minutes a day to do independent research on Barack Benghazi Obama he would become their political out cast.

Television news, propaganda and disinformation at its finest

Of course that would require turning off the television and the low information voter isn’t about to do that. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

 

The Political Outcast

By Tad Cronn

President Obama says he wants to restrict Americans’ rights under the Second Amendment in order to “save lives,” but Evan Todd isn’t buying it.

Todd was one of the people injured in the infamous Columbine High School shootings, and in a recent open letter to President Obama, he pulled no punches.

“Why would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens?” he demanded. “Whose side are you on?”

It’s a question many people have wondered about.

The shooting survivor stresses that under Obama’s proposals, law-abiding Americans would be put in danger by being restricted from owning certain weapons or having the amount of ammunition they can carry limited.

Todd points out that assault weapons bans have little effect on crime, and in particular he notes that the original federal weapons ban did nothing to protect him from being shot in 1999.

“It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher. The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke,” Todd wrote.

Todd takes a particular exception to requiring universal background checks:

Entire article below:

Justice Scalia “The Constitution is Dead”

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, and Patriot.

It should be quite amusing to see how the media picks up this sound bite if the are intelligent enough to do so.

Unknowing progressives will become orgasmic at the title of this article.

I know what Scalia means, but part of me couldn’t help but think there was a little irony in the Justice’s recent pronouncement:

“[The Constiution’s] not a living document. It’s dead, dead, dead!” Speaking to a group at Southern Methodist University, Scalia was promoting what he considers a “strict constructionist” interpretation of the Constitution.

Even with the usurpation of Obama and his Marxist allies currently playing the dictators from hell, We the People may bend we will not break and our Constitution will prevail.

That will be long after Obama and his minions are pushing up daisy  at a local bone orchard.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

The Political Outcast

by Michael Minkoff

Justice Scalia  “The Constitution is Dead”I know what Scalia means, but part of me couldn’t help but think there was a little irony in the Justice’s recent pronouncement: “[The Constiution’s] not a living document. It’s dead, dead, dead!” Speaking to a group at Southern Methodist University, Scalia was promoting what he considers a “strict constructionist” interpretation of the Constitution.

The debate on how to interpret the Constitution is older than the Constitution.

Most of the Founding Fathers were strict constructionists (as you would imagine… since they drafted the document. Of course they wanted it interpreted as it was written). Over time, as high technology and low morals altered the nature of American society and politics, the question started to arise more and more: “Isn’t this document a little outdated? But rather than re-write it, why not just interpret it freshly for our modern circumstances?” Which basically meant, “Why not just ignore the clear intent of the Founding Fathers and just draw from the Constitution whatever we want it to say…” (Entire article below)

Veteran Stands Up For 2nd Amendment At Chicago Anti-Gun Forum

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It’s insightful to listen to a member of the military who has served his country in combat interact with a group of people interested in passing legislation that would prohibit carrying a concealed weapon.

Their differences on how they interpret the constitution are oh so predictable.

A military veteran delivered a passionate defense of the Second Amendment at a Chicago-area anti-gun “forum” Sunday, saying he went to war to protect all Americans’ inalienable rights, including the right to bear arms. He also argued the threat of “tyranny” is still just as real as it was in the past.

Progressives don’t seem to get that Obama by his daily moves and under the cover of darkness moves has a game plan for the rest of us. 

It clearly doesn’t compute for them that with out the 2nd Amendment they can say goodbye to the First. 

In his view of America We the People become serfs on Uncle Sam’s Plantation.

I choose freedom!

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Treacherous waters ahead for gun control advocates

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

Examiner writer Andy Martin make excellent points as he catalogues the results of legislators who attempt to take away our Constitutional rights.

As he points out, the Clinton, so-called Assault Weapon ban of 1996 was proved to be a abject failure in the Columbine murders in 1999.

Who do our elected officials believe they are when they can turn everyday citizens into criminals;  because they believe they should be able to protect themselves, from muggers, rapists, murders, car jackers and home invaders. 

It is the view of this editor that normal law abiding citizens will be putting pressure on politicians to allow them to carry concealed weapons after completing training courses to do so. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message. 

The Examiner

 Anthony Martin

Writing in an op-ed piece for the Washington Post Saturday, Scott Higham, Sari Horwitz, David S. Fallis, and Joel Achenback stated that treacherous waters lie ahead for gun control advocates. The reason is the history of the movement to limit the Constitutional rights of citizens, which shows that such attempts have usually backfired. Complete article below.

Where will you personally draw the line on protecting the Second Amendment?

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

There can be little doubt that Obama sees himself above the law and has little use for the United States Constitution.

At this point we have little to fear about Hillary and her signing a U.N. Gun Ban Treaty.  Use a little logic here, if she could have pulled this off, she would have.

It is only a matter of time until he crosses the proverbial line in the sand that we the people will have had enough.

Perhaps he sees himself as an emperor or a modern-day dictator.  The fact remains, any treaties he or his minions sign be they by proclamation or executive order are null and void.  The proof to my suggestion can be found here in the U.S. Constitution.

To which the reader may choose to retort, but Obama will just call the 2nd Amendment null and void.  To do so would be a declaration of war on We the People, a war he and his socialists can and will not win.

Mark Alexander

American Patriots and Guns

All Patriots Are Obligated to Be Armed and Ready

“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic.” –Joseph Story

On the most recent “Black Friday,” the day after Thanksgiving, which has become the biggest commercial sales day of the year, despite the continuing economic decline, there were record sales in one notable product category: Guns.
According to Stephen Fischer, director of the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System, “NICS experienced its highest number of transactions processed since system inception [in 1998], with 154,873, which is nearly 20 percent over the 129,166 processed on Black Friday 2011.” This year’s total checks will undoubtedly beat last year’s record of 16.4 million.

Attack on the Second Amendment?: New Hampshire Man Arrested for Firing Warning Shot During Burglary

Commentary by Jim Campbell

Look for this case to go nowhere.  This is a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment.  If you legally own a weapon you may fire it in a responsible manner on your own property your are in compliance with the law.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Saturday’s arrest of Dennis Fleming, a New Hampshire grandfather of 14 has drummed up quite a bit of controversy.

Fleming says that after his own home was burglarized earlier in the day, he spotted a man coming out of his neighbor’s window. He took his gun and he fired a shot into the ground to scare the suspect, and then he held the man at gunpoint until the police arrived. No one was hurt but the police charged Fleming with reckless conduct.

Listen to Judge Napolitano here:

Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in on the case, saying, “This is either a serious oversight on the part of the police or a serious misunderstanding on their part as to what our individual rights are under the Second Amendment, which, of course, would trump any local law in New Hampshire.”

Napolitano cited two Supreme Court decisions which rule that if you legally own a gun, you can use it on your property to protect the people who live on the property.