Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.
The author on the nonsense below, Elliott Bronstein, Seattle’s Office for Civil Rights, is long on verbage and short on knowledge of the United States Constitution.
Can’t use the matter “Citizen or brown bag.” See video here.
I refer him to the Supremacy Clause which of course makes all in place U.S. Constitutional law superior to state law and would in fact invalidate them.
Our ” Founding Fathers” saved us from the ignorant folks of Seattle and elsewher. This about it, would you trust anyone that came up with such a notion to determine that which is potentially offensive?
Liberals, Socialists and Marxists like Obama and his minions offend the shit out of me, every thing they say: would that allow me to potentially ban them?
Government workers in the city of Seattle have been advised that the terms “citizen” and “brown bag” are potentially offensive and may no longer be used in official documents and discussions.
KOMO-TV reports that the city’s Office of Civil Rights instructed city workers in a recent internal memo to avoid using the words because some may find them offensive.
“Luckily, we’ve got options.”
- Elliott Bronstein, Seattle’s Office for Civil Rights
“Luckily, we’ve got options,” Elliott Bronstein of the Office for Civil Rights wrote in the memo obtained by the station. “For ‘citizens,’ how about ‘residents?'”
In an interview with Seattle’s KIRO Radio, Bronstein said the term “brown bag” has been used historically as a way to judge skin color.
“For a lot of particularly African-American community members, the phrase brown bag does bring up associations with the past when a brown bag was actually used, I understand, to determine if people’s skin color was light enough to allow admission to an event or to come into a party that was being held in a private home,” Bronstein said. More Below.