Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot
If Canada is clued in that the U.N. serves no useful purpose what has been holding back members of the United States Congress?
At the very least we tell them to find another location as we have no desire to invite terrorists under the cover of diplomats to American soil.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.
“The UN is a collection of evil windbags…”
Truer words were never spoken.by 1389 in 1389 (blog admin)
MPAC represents US Government at Human Rights Conference
Today, Salam Al-Marayati, the president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, spoke in Warsaw, Poland, as part of Ambassador Avis Bohlen’s U.S. delegation to the Human Dimension Implementation Meeting (HDIM) of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
Just for starters, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) is just one more front group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. It is traitorous and should never have been allowed to operate in any non-Muslim country. Its members should all have been deported (or, preferably, hanged as spies and saboteurs) a very long time ago. It is inconceivable that the US should be using them as emissaries.
Commentary by Jim Campbell
Apparently being mortally wounded or severely injured isn’t considered being shot at, so says Obama who has never served our country in combat. It is now quite clear that if a decision is to be made Obama will make the wrong one. What decision has he made that has been right for “our” country? (emphasis on our not his!)
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.
So I just got a letter from MyPay (the way we get paid in the military), saying that I will only reason Combat Pay while deployed for the days that I take fire or am in a hostile area. Now, as an Infantry Marine, I’m constantly in a combat zone…it may not always be popping off, but for them to take that away from us is bullshit. Now, the aviation tech who sits on Camp Leatherneck, sure, I can see him not getting Combat Pay, but to take it away from the grunts, the ground pounders, the front line of defense…come on, Uncle Sam. You let the Liberals win a big one here… Marine from Florida (We are not posting his name for obvious reasons)
According to Military.com, and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (H.R. 1540-7 Sec 616) as of February 1, 2012, this new measure went into effect, and soldiers who are to receive the additional $225/mo. combat pay ‘must’ be in immediate risk of harm. The measure is very specific in its criteria for receiving the additonal pay.
Posted in Obama has determined that Combat Pay for US forces will be determined by a new criteria
Tagged Afghanistan, Asia, Congress, diplomacy, Economy, Education, Espionage, Featured Story, Foreign Policy, History, Homeland security, Human Rights, Intelligence, Islam, Islamic extremism, Middle East, Military Funding, Military Technology, News, Obama, Other, Politics, Saudi Arabia, Soldiers, strategy, terrorism, United Nations, United States, Weapons
I’ve criticized centralization of power in Washington, and I’ve condemned efforts for global “economic governance.”
The simple message is that bureaucrats shouldn’t try to control our lives, regardless of whether those pencil-pushers reside in Washington or the United Nations.
These are points I made in this interview for Fox Business News.
The specific topic is a boondoggle project know as the White House Rural Council, but we also discuss a troubling U.N. scheme called Agenda 21.
Both are similar in that they are based on the idea that far-away bureaucracies (like this one) should have power over local communities.
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Agenda 21, Big Government, Centralization, conservative blog network, Federalism, International bureaucracy, News Appearance, Obama, The Collectivist Impulse to Plan Other People’s Lives, United Nations, White House Rural Council
Comment by Jim Campbell
In a must see video below, one must scratch their head and say they said what? Countries that routinely brutalize and murder Christians, Jews, copts, and members of their own faith are calling out the U.S. for human rights violations? This is comical to say the least. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.
Colum Lynch reported yesterday that the Obama administration is working to stop the UN Human Rights Council from referring Syria to the UN Security Council.
That unusual posture is not, contrary to appearances, the latest example of the administration’s reluctance to criticize human rights abuses. Nor is it the result of a foreign policy that generally “works against dictatorial friends of America and does not oppose, in any significant way, all dictatorial foes of America.”
In fact, this time the Obama administration is doing the right thing in opposing European efforts to move the Syria issue through the Human Rights Council instead of directly through the Security Council. The administration evidently realizes that allowing the tyrannical regimes that control the Human Rights Council to refer a country to the Security Council would set a precedent that could be used against Israel and other western democracies.
by Jim Campbell
More and more Americans are coming to the chilling realization that U.S. membership in the United Nations poses a very real threat to our survival as a free and independent nation.
How many Americans are familiar with it’s formation in 1945 by Communists and socialists? How much more unaware could the American citizen be to not demand from their representatives that the U.S. get out of the U.N.?
Obviously, Americans getting back to work, coming home from wars in the Pacific and Europe were focused on starting families and purchasing their part of the American Dream while this insidious organization planned to destroy from its outset, the very principles upon which America was founded.
by Jim Campbell
One who engages in Islamofascism. In general, Islamofascism refers to the notion that Islam is not so much a religion as it is a political ideology that in many ways resembles “fascism” (i.e. the modern common definition of fascism which equates it with totalitarianism, as opposed to the original capital-F Italian-style Fascism). More specifically, Islamofascism is used to describe either the social structure of a society living under strict Islamic shari’a law, or the interpersonal behavior of someone who acts in accordance with true Islam. An Islamofascist can either be an Islamic fundamentalist, or someone who uses violence or bullying tactics to impose Islamic principles on others — or, more bluntly, a Muslim bigot whose religious beliefs are the source of his bigotry.
Islamofascism similarly pursues its aims through the willful, arbitrary, and gratuitous disruption of global society, either by terrorist conspiracies or by violation of peace between states. Al Qaeda has recourse to the former weapon; Hezbollah, in assaulting northern Israel, used the latter. These are not acts of protest, but calculated strategies for political advantage through undiluted violence. Hezbollah showed fascist methods both in its kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and in initiating that action without any consideration for the Lebanese government of which it was a member. Indeed, Lebanese democracy is a greater enemy of Hezbollah than Israel. Punishments from Sharia law show the same lack of concern for Human Rights and life itself.
It’s time for the United Nations to be disbanded What useful function does it serve? How effective are U.N. sanctions? Sanctions against Iran have had little effect in persuading it to stop its pursuit on nuclear capabilities.
Gun owners might not feel besieged right now, but they should be very concerned. Last week the Obama administration announced its support for the UN Small Arms Treaty. This treaty poses real risks for freedom and safety in the United States as well as the rest of the world.
We Keep Our Guns, UN Can Have Obama
According to the U.N., guns used in armed conflicts cause 300,000 deaths worldwide every year. Their proposed solution is a simple one. Keep rebels from getting guns by requiring that countries “prevent, combat and eradicate” what those countries define as “the illicit trade in small arms.”
The UN’s solution isn’t too surprising when one looks at the long list of notorious totalitarian regimes, such as Syria, Cuba, Rwanda, Vietnam, Zimbabwe, and Sierra Leone, which support these “reforms.” But not all insurgencies are “bad.” To ban providing guns to rebels in totalitarian countries is like arguing that there is never anything such as a just war.
Charles Krauthammer Nails Down Ideologue Obama Perfectly
2010 February 2
News Reel Blog
by Michael van der Galien
Obama represents a clear need for those that would run for president to receive extensive psychological evaluation by a panel of non-partisan psychiatrists. Had this been done, the personal psychological characteristics surly would have disqualified him from running for office. His need for approval by the despots of the world while ignoring the will of the vast majority of the the citizens of the United States is quite telling. He actually would prefer to be ruler of the world, not president. Ultimately, he will replace smiling Jimmy Carter as the biggest failure as president during the past 100 years. Random thoughts while observing a self-destructive president, J.C.
Appearing on Frank Gaffney’s show on Secure Freedom Radio earlier today, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer delivered the ultimate smackdown of President Barack Obama.
The conservative columnist proved he understands Obama completely. As I argued yesterday, conservatives are making a tragic mistake by mistaking the man for a pragmatist. He is not, he’s a leftist ideologue.
Krauthammer understands that perfectly. He reminded Gaffney that Obama truly reveled in the praise of the world’s most feared dictators and the standing ovation they gave him when he spoke to them at the United Nations, where he apologized for every single thing America had ever done.
That’s bad, but what’s even worse is that, as Krauthammer pointed out, this is a commander-in-chief who refuses to use the term “Islamic terrorism” and who pretends that underwear bomber Abdulmutallab was an “isolated individual.” He wasn’t. He was a member of Al Qaeda, and all those not blinded by some fancy ideological veil know it.
Sadly, the most powerful man on earth isn’t one of them. No, he has his head buried firmly in the Utopian sand. He simply refuses to even entertain the thought of there being a serious problem with Islamic extremists. After all, to an ideological radical progressive, America is the source for all evil in the world. Non-Western terrorists are the “victims” of Western imperialism, not “aggressors” in a war they want. Complete Story