By Jim Campbell
The news yesterday has been replete with the explanation that conservative media mogul Andrew Breitbart’s death was the result of “natural causes.” How can that possibly be?” An announcement on his website reads in part, “Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles. We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.”
Photo: Courtesy Big Government
He began his meteoric rise as the counter force to the media cover-ups and government lies constantly bombarding us by a left leaning media. He became a major voice of the conservative movement that was helping to reshape our country. Brietbart began his career as a citizen journalist at The Drudge Report, before launching his own series of websites to expose media bias. He created a platform for citizen journalists to bypass the traditional media, and break the stories that they tried to hide. They include Breitbart.tv (citizen journalism and news clips), Big Government (corruption in American politics), Big Journalism (media bias), Big Hollywood (bias in the entertainment industry), and Big Peace (foreign policy and world events).
Let’s discuss death by natural causes. As mentioned above yesterday’s media, likely in haste to get the story of his untimely death in print and television as soon as possible said the cause of death was from “natural causes,” when factually no cause had been determined.
The Los Angeles Coroner said via e-mail Thursday morning, at 8:54 a.m. PST, that Andrew Breitbart’s cause of death had not yet been determined pending the examination of his body. Craig R. Harvey, chief coroner investigator and chief of operations for the Los Angeles Coroner’s Office confirmed Andrew Breitbart’s time of death as being 12:19 a.m. Thursday at UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles. He went on to offer the following short comment via e-mail: “Body not yet examined. No final cause of death yet established by the Coroner.” An autopsy is planned for today, but the Los Angeles Police Department said it is not investigating the circumstances of his death. Is this a bit odd? No mention has been made that investigation by the police happened by normal investigative protocol.
According to the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) Manual for medical examiner and coroners handbook on death registration, Natural death is defined as ‘‘due solely or nearly totally to disease and/or the aging process.’’ It’s fair to say that at the age of 43, age would not have been a significant factor.
ABC reported yesterday, in a story for the AP that Andrew Brietbart suffered from heart problems. The AP report said nothing concerning a previous heart attack, how long he had heart disease, what type, and it is at this point the allegation remains unsubstantiated by additional corroborating information from credible sources. Was there a familial history of heart disease?
In a very short time, Brietbart became a legend. He was a one-man powerhouse who changed the way we received the news. Recently Breitbart had publicly denounced the mainstream media’s performance in vetting Barack Obama for the Presidency in 2008. As noted on Townhall.com Andrew Breitbart recently vowed to make sure such a travesty did not happen again in 2012.
It’s entirely possible that natural causes may have resulted in his death. It’s also possible that his death could have been caused by covert unnatural causes. I’m not proposing a conspiracy here; I’m proposing a theory, resting on a number of serious questions with at this point no answers.
What if sinister forces had arranged the death of Andrew Breitbart? Could he have become a significant risk to the Obama administration, that Obama’s handlers might have deemed by his continued presence and reach, Mr. Brietbart had become such a threat that he must be silenced?
Could he have been ready to unleash another bombshell? Remember his speech at C-PAC where he admonished that he had the videos of Obama’s college years and this time he would be vetted? Time will tell. Where are those videos now? Will they ever be seen? Breitbart’s focus had been of finding the truth and exposing the lies and corruption of the current administration.
It wasn’t just the administration he continually exposed, Andrew Brietbart took an in your face approach to many that were polar opposites ideologically. He confronted the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and derided the participants for their clueless.
On one occasion he crossed the line of a mob protesting its pro union cause and challenged the sign holders to explain what was on their signs. They couldn’t so he began moving to the center of this group of cowards resulting in their moving away from him as if Moses had once again appeared to part the Red Sea. Finally as they were leaving one participant slurred an epithet about Andrew’s sexual preferences to which he laughed at the kid and told him he was being so politically correct and insensitive.
Remember the James O’Keefe videos on ACORN? That was Andrew Breitbart. He helped James O’Keefe and his friend Hannah as they went walking in portraying a pimp and a prostitute looking for ways to scam the system, and there was ACORN telling them how to do it. All caught on video tape, it caused ACORN to “theoretically shut down,” while they changed their names and came back to life morphed as a number of separate organizations. These groups are the result of community organizing still using our tax dollars, “to help get out the vote” even if fraudulent applications as well as the dead were counted among Obama’s supporters.
Breitbart exposed the texting of sexually explicit pictures by Anthony Weiner, then congressman who was forced to resign for putting pictures of his anatomy out on twitter. Weiner blamed Breitbart for displaying his body parts in text messages alleging Mr. Breitbart hacked his computer and was involved.
At the time of his death Breitbart was still waiting for Anthony Weiner’s apology that likely would have never been given. In the end we are left with the saga of Weinergate and a fallen mentally unbalanced former congressman.
Andrew spent the last hour before his death discussing his passion, politics with marketing executive Arthur Sando at the Brentwood, a local bar. They said good-bye around 11:30 p.m., 50 minutes before Breitbart was pronounced dead by physicians at UCLA.
What was Andrew doing walking from the Brentwood to his home? It’s plausible as Breitbart’s home was apparently near by, the distance not yet reported. According to Sando he had stopped in for a drink and “Was on his Black Berry a lot, and hadn’t really been drinking. ”
Andrew Breitbart’s fans numbered in the millions. Covering the issues he had since Obama came to town, he likely made a significant number of enemies. Would one of them want to see him silenced?
Talk show host, Michael Savage just asked the question, “Was Breitbart assassinated?” Savage noted, that Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails,”referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn.
Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home. Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home.
Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple, invited Breitbart. Breitbart said again to Carlson, “I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama “sold in 2008.”
According to an article reported yesterday by Jared Morgan of the Brentwood Patch, “Breitbart’s Sudden Death Sparks Call for Investigation.” Journalist and film producer Dan Gifford, a Brentwood resident who writes for Breitbart’s site BigHollywood.com, had this to say in an interview, Gifford told Patch that “he and Breitbart had shared stories about death threats that they had both received.”
With some saying he may have been assassinated, the Los Angeles coroner will be reviewing his autopsy very carefully to determine the cause of death
Now this reporter could go into the then secret plans by the CIA to develop methods of causing death making it appear from “natural” causes.
Since the early 50’s “Assassination by ‘Natural Causes” The CIA Considered Inducing Death”, WASHINGTON POST, 4/2/79. Heavily censored CIA documents from more than a half century ago (1952) show the Agency considered performing experiments on terminal cancer patients under the guise of “legitimate medical work.”
These inducing death methods by hear attack originally involved the use of chemicals. To avoid having these drugs found in any autopsy, they need to select special drugs to use. So, this method has limited opportunities for use. In 1960s, US successfully developed a radio-frequency weapon. Since then, CIA’s assassins switched to using radio-frequency weapons to induce their victims to have heart attacks.. This is because it is more convenient and can avoid the use of chemicals, which can be being detected.
(Source) “Wonder Weapons” by Douglas Pasternak, US NEWS & WORLD REPORT, (7 July 1997)
I choose not to follow this path of reasoning in doing so I might be accused of promoting a conspiracy when what I have attempted to do is put forth questions on my theory that will require a serious investigation.
Of course if Andrew Breitbart actually had a serious heart problem then that may be shown as the cause of death by the coroner. Think about that, how difficult would it be to make contact with the Coroner and suggest that he died from a heart attack or natural causes, as it would be in his very best interest of all those concerned including his own immediate safety and that of his immediate family to do so.
Will we ever know about the true cause of Mr. Breitbart’s death? Probably not, this is big league hardball where the truth is frequently trumped by power.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.