GOP-Past Is Prologue: Reformers Need Not Apply

by Stacy Drake

The GOP establishment’s Palin-bashing is intended to pressure Romney to pick someone who they know will play by their rules. By denigrating Palin, claiming she wasn’t qualified — when an honest look at her record clearly states that she was — they are removing any possibility that a Beltway outsider like her has any chance to be on this year’s ticket.

With this cycle’s Republican primary race winding down, much of the media attention has shifted to who Mitt Romney will select to be his running mate.

With this cycle’s Republican primary race winding down, much of the media attention has shifted to who Mitt Romney will select to be his running mate.

Some press members are using the opportunity to take shots at Sarah Palin by repeating old memes. Axe-grinders like Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace are using the discussion to push their ongoing agenda to escape any accountability for what happened during the 2008 election. All of this is sadly predictable. However, what was not expected were members of the GOP establishment joining in with the anti-Palin chorus.
The GOP establishment’s Palin-bashing is intended to pressure Romney to pick someone who they know will play by their rules. By denigrating Palin, claiming she wasn’t qualified — when an honest look at her record clearly states that she was — they are removing any possibility that a Beltway outsider like her has any chance to be on this year’s ticket.

That certainly wasn’t the perception of conservative voters in 2008, many of whom voted for John McCain primarily because Sarah Palin was on the ticket. Polls from the time also show that Palin provided the McCain campaign with a large lead in the polls against Obama after months of being behind. 

Karl Rove attempted to re-write history with even this fact in a recent Wall Street Journal post, claiming, “John McCain’s camp felt that while they were ahead after a better-than-expected summer, they needed to shake things up with an out-of-the-box pick. This thinking produced Sarah Palin.” (More Below)

This is easily disproven by reading the polling data from 2008, which indicates that John McCain didn’t take the lead until after he selected Sarah Palin to run on the ticket with him. He was in negative territory during that entire summer. In fact, Schmidt was hired by the McCain campaign during the summer of 2008 precisely because things were not going well. Someone with Rove’s vast knowledge of the American electoral process knows this.

Nonetheless, Costa’s NRO article goes on to describe the general feeling within the GOP establishment regarding Sarah Palin and her selection in ’08:

GOP strategists are quick to note that Palin’s rise and fall in public opinion was not a singularity but a clarifying moment following other problematic Republican vice-presidential picks from recent decades — from then-first-term Maryland governor Spiro Agnew in 1968 to youthful Indiana senator Dan Quayle in 1988.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, speaking in Washington last week, summed up the emerging consensus among the GOP’s political class. “The single most important criteria has to be the capacity to be president,” Cheney said. “That’s why you pick them. Lots of times in the past that has not been the foremost criteria.”

Cheney did not cite Palin by name, but to many Republican operatives who read or heard the remarks, the message was clear: Romney should pick an anti-Palin. Instead of focusing on geography, gender, and biography during the search, Romney should ignore the “talking heads,” Cheney said, and search for competence, not sizzle.”

Then, University of Virginia professor Larry Sabato weighed in, with Costa quoting him as saying:

[Sabato] suspects, however, that this is probably not an “organized conspiracy” against a Palin-type selection but rather a “generals-fighting-the-last-war mentality.”

Maybe Mr. Sabato is merely repeating what he’s heard elsewhere, but it is doubtful that all of the others are. There is obviously a concerted effort by some bigwigs in the party to rewrite history and make Palin the scapegoat for their 2008 loss. Now, why would these Republican power players make this move at this juncture? Why would they risk alienating a large base of conservative and Tea Party voters before a big general election?

Stephen K. Bannon was also interviewed by Robert Costa, and may have provided some answers. The article reads:

For his part, Palin ally Stephen K. Bannon, the chairman of Breitbart News and director of The Undefeated, a documentary on Palin, is not surprised to see the “permanent political class” coalesce around a group of insider veep choices.

“This is their default position,” he sighs. “They can’t help themselves. Guys like Portman and McDonnell are right out of central casting. Those two, and candidates like them, are company men. They come up through the ranks. They’re not dangerous and innovative. They could easily become members of a country club.”

“The question Mitt Romney has to answer is whether he can win an election against Barack Obama by listening to the people who are just like him,” Bannon says. “To win, you’re going to have to galvanize the grass roots and the Tea Party. I know the establishment doesn’t want to hear it, but it may be the political reality.”

And the fact is, as Bannon noted, the GOP establishment often tears down reformers they do not like and feel uncomfortable around, and that is why Palin was the perfect scapegoat for them after the 2008 election. She is not one of them, she doesn’t hire them, and she has repeatedly informed them that she will never be for sale — to them or to their cronies.

Sarah Palin’s now entirely-vetted record reminds us that this isn’t the first time she has been at odds with party leaders. The Alaska GOP learned quickly that she wasn’t going to be a good teammate in corruption; she wouldn’t play their games and stuck to her principles instead. In 2003, Palin blew the whistle on fellow GOP Commissioner Randy Ruedrich for his unethical behavior. She was instrumental in tearing down the corruption-plagued GOP machine in her home state:

Mrs. Palin has meanwhile passed an ethics law. She’s tightened up oil oversight. She forced the legislature to rewrite the oil tax law. That new law raised taxes on the industry, for which Mrs. Palin is now taking some knocks, but the political background here is crucial.

The GOP machine has crumbled. Attorney General Renkes resigned. Mr. Ruedrich was fined $12,000. Jim Clark—Mr. Murkowski’s lead pipeline negotiator—pleaded guilty to conspiring with an oil firm. At least three legislators have been convicted. Sen. Ted Stevens is under indictment for oil entanglements, while Rep. Don Young is under investigation.

Throughout it all, Mrs. Palin has stood for reform.

This made her a target then, and it apparently continues to make her a target today.

The Republican political class is pushing to get an “un-Palin” as the vice president, meaning they do not want someone who is a reformer of the Tea Party mold. Such an “un-Palin” candidate is unlikely to excite the grassroots, but that is okay for a Republican establishment and political operative class that wants someone who won’t question their losing tactics like Palin did in 2008.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “GOP-Past Is Prologue: Reformers Need Not Apply

  1. Welfare Addiction and Welfare Recipents who become addicted:

    Welfare Addiction is totally destructive: Yes, many of them do have liberal parents and studies have been done based on the permissiveness of parents, and of course a lot of them come from welfare parents, and only lived with a variety of relatives that would take care of them while their irresponsible parents were out partying, drinking and drugging and producing more little babies for somebody else, and the government to take care of. And, of course, in growing up they were trained and taught by thier social workers, teachers and others that they were victims and therefore entitled for somebody else to take care of them. They learned the blame game really good and thorough.

    That is why it is so difficult at times to get some of them to believe that something that happened 200 years ago is no excuse for your disrespectful and hateful and irresponsible behavior today.

    The race hustlers like Jesse Jackson, Louis Farakhan, Al Sharpton, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Whoopi Goldberg, and others have done more to harm the blacks in this country than any white group ever did. The liberal establishment in government created the Welfare State as a way to destroy black families, as they passed rules that said, “If you marry baby’s daddy, you lose your check.” Having babies and not getting married became a cottage industry, and meantime, the little girls having bonus babies, would keep partying, and leave the little ones for mama, granny or others to raise, and of course the drive by daddys sometimes were not even known and had nothing to do with raising the kids.

    This is truly sad. And, of course the white addicts many times these days are into the same mentality. The whole society is falling apart, as the schools and government programs have reduced all to the lowest common denominator socially, academically and spiritually. That is why the country is in the moral decay that it is today. Daniel is a product of this culture that the Liberals Created, and the idiot followers of the Liberals do not even realize that the Liberals destroyed them on purpose as part of the Communist Goal. And Hollyweird, the home of the First American Communists, helped tremendously.

  2. And she’s a relative of Karl Rove and Obama both? Who’s he really working for?

  3. I would like Palin to have a bettter job in Romneys caninet than VP.. I would like to see her take over the Oil business with her knowledge of how oil companys work and Romneys knowledge of how to make..spend money they would get us out of the horrible debt Obama the fake has put us in…I think Romney should get someone he has been in the military for the VP . He doesnt seem to know any more about running the Militays than Obama the fake does..

    • Karl Rove is a damned scoundrel and is not to be believed ever. I cannot stand that little arrogant Piece of Shi++. Every time FAUX News has this smirking little bastard on their show, I flip the channel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s