Obamacare Silver Linings: A Limited Victory for Limited Government

The Heritage Foundation

Todd Gaziano

Well the pundits and legal beagles all got it wrong but Chief Justice Roberts got it right.  By reaffirming Congress as the body to level taxes and finding the individual mandate not Constitutional he has sent the right message, the law goes back to congress where it belongs. 

There it will be completely repealed or serious compromises will be made implementing Republican ideas that Nancy Pelosi never allowed to be heard in 2010 in Congress.

The bonus round hits in November as the electorate will be mad as hell rejecting ObamaCare 2:1.  This may well be the end of Obama and the lemming progressives that bow to him.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.


Today’s Supreme Court decision on Obamacare—though it is tragic with regard to statutory interpretation and health care policy—has two significant constitutional silver linings. At the constitutional level, the stakes are much more significant and resistant to political influence. In short, the American people may elect new representatives to repeal Obamacare, but today’s constitutional rulings are far more enduring. And they are, on balance, wonderful.

The Court is inexplicable in reading the mandate penalty as a tax when President Obama and congressional sponsors emphatically denied it was a tax, but that is only a misreading of a statute. On that statutory ruling, the Court majority held that the mandate penalty is not a tax for purposes of the tax Anti-Injunction Act, but is a tax under Congress’s taxing power, despite the fact that the law never calls it a tax. Yes, this is a terribly strained reading of the statute, but conservative constitutional scholars who challenged the mandate never said that Congress did not have the power to enact a tax similar to the mandate penalty.

Despite the Court’s error in reading the individual mandate penalty as a tax, five justices opined that the mandate, standing alone, cannot be justified under the Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause. This is not remarkable to anyone who knows the original meaning of the Commerce and Necessary and Proper powers, but it is a serious blow to 90 percent of the legal academics and about 90 percent of Congress, since these have been the clauses used to justify so much of the modern administrative state.

On the pro-government side of the ledger, Chief Justice Roberts goes too far to expand the reach of Congress’s taxing power. That is not a good development by any means, but the Framers understood that there are at least some political checks on the use of the taxing power. This is one reason why President Obama and the liberal sponsors of Obamacare tried so hard to deny that it was a tax. One political reality of today’s decision is that the Court essentially reads Obamacare as a massive tax increase, which falls most heavily on the middle class. Didn’t someone promise not to do that?

The majority’s ruling on the onerous conditions attached to the Medicaid expansion is also helpful in limiting Congress’s power to bribe states into submission or to threaten them with the loss of federal revenue in a long-run federal-state program. In a fractured set of opinions that will take some additional time to untangle, a majority of justices imposed limits on Congress’s ability to threaten the denial of previous funding streams based on states’ agreeing to new funding conditions in those programs. Indeed, seven justices seemed to agree that some constitutional limitations were breached in the Medicaid expansion. This itself is a landmark ruling.

Liberal legal scholars are not going to like most of today’s constitutional rulings; their wailing will start pretty soon. In the long run, today’s constitutional rulings will be seen as an important victory in promoting fidelity to the Constitution and the ideal of limited government. The American people and their elected representatives have a lot of work to do to repeal and replace the Obamacare statute. Moreover, we still have an uphill battle to restore and preserve the written Constitution we have been bequeathed, but the Court today put some temporary brakes on our republic’s descent down an extra-constitutional slippery slope in which the federal government can control any aspect of our lives that has any imaginable impact on commerce—meaning everything.

Today the hard work continues, as Benjamin Franklin long ago urged, to “keep” the Constitution the Framers granted us, with its ideal of limited government. But in the days that come, I think we should go forward with more hope that the struggle is both worthy and manageable.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Obamacare Silver Linings: A Limited Victory for Limited Government

  1. Being Obama lied – does this have any power to impeach or something. His constant lies have cost the public millions. I would think this is treason or something. I am not a lawyer but man this is horrid.

  2. Question:

    The Democrats used the “Reconciliation process” and 51 votes without transparency to ram Obamacare down our throats.

    The Republicans should now use the “Reconciliation process” and 51 votes at this time and with transparency to remove Obamacare from down our throats.

  3. Conservatives……………..it is now our time to do something about this travesty that took place today. We all need to get out and recruit, get people to sign up and put this matter “to bed” in November! Our country depends on “Us”, not liberals. Liberals are followers of the people who hand them something for “free” which actually is paid for by others!


  4. Of course, obama-soetoro promised “not to do that” – -but, like ANY of his promises – -IT WAS A LIE!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s