Hillary testifies on Benghazi and Senator John McCain isn’t buying it


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Hillary Clinton has always been a stranger from the truth.  Said a better way she is a pathological liar just like her husband Slick.

large-1Fraud Alert

Whether she was dodging gunfire on the tarmac in Bosnia, to why her parents named her after Sir Edmund Hillary, to Chelsea’s whereabouts on 911 saying she was right in the think of it.  None of the above was true, but in the pathological liars mind it may well have been.  

“It’s wonderful to see you in good health and as combative as ever,” Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) greeted Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the Senate hearing on the Benghazi attack on Wednesday. Citing questions he still had, the senator noted that Clinton’s answers were inadequate.


Be sure to see the Blaze coverage, ” Angry Clinton Explodes at Questioning on Libya Protest: ‘We Have Four Dead Americans…What Difference at This Point Does It Make?’

“There are many questions that are unanswered, and the answers that you’ve given this morning are not satisfactory to me,” McCain said, particularly pointing to the security at the U.S. consulate. “The American people deserve to know answers. And they certainly don’t deserve false answers.”

And what UN Ambassador Susan Rice said following the attack was false information, he said, further questioning why “the administration still refuses to provide the full text of the e-mails regarding the deletion of references to Al Qaeda and terrorism in the talking points.”

“You ought to have your facts straight,” McCain told Clinton. “Here we are, four months later, and we still don’t have the basic information.” (More below.)

Clinton said she understood McCain’s “very strong” feelings. “We just have disagreement,” she said. “We have a disagreement about what did happen and when it happened with respect to explaining the sequence of events.”

Clinton also pointed to congressional holds on bilateral security assistance and other aid. “We got to get our act together between the administration and the Congress,” she said.

“If this is a priority, and if we are serious about trying to help this government stand up security and deal with what is a very dangerous environment from east to west,” she added, “then we have to work together.”

As the Daily Caller reported, Senator McCain was not the only one to find Secretary of State Clinton not credible but Senator Ron Johnson.

Johnson accused her of “purposefully misleading the American people” by blaming nonexistent protests.

About these ads

7 thoughts on “Hillary testifies on Benghazi and Senator John McCain isn’t buying it

  1. What a lying scumbucket that idiot is!!!! She will only say what “Barack INSANE Ovomit” wants her to! It’s useless to ask any of those puppets anything ever!!! What losers ,just pitiful excuses for the low life beings they really all are!!

  2. She said she was not aware of any requests for added security. Is that the rope we need?

  3. Now, now – let’s have some compassion for Chelsea’s mom , after all she is a Clinton and consequently can’t help herself – she must tell lies !

    And, at ‘this point’ , what difference does it make, since OWEbaama got elected ?

    Pwerhaps when she goes to prison, she won’t be waterboarded for the truth , because at that point, what difference will it make ?

    My pretense at being a Liberal isn’t working very well, is it ?

  4. Whether or not we are for or against giving aid in any form to Libya and regardless of how Congress may differ from this administration on that opinion, it has nothing to do with providing security to the consulate. It is all a smokescreen to cover up the fact that this administration failed (refused?) to protect its consulate and our American people there.

  5. Comment to Hisgrace from J.C.

    I agree with you completely, Benghazi was not an Embassy, Christopher Stevens was working with the CIA, guns were being shipped to Syria from that outpost through alQuaeda.
    More troubling was the fact that the CIA were holding two prisoners there in direct violation of Obama’s executive orders that the U.S. would not be involved in this sort of activity.
    In a nutshell this is what the entire cover up is about. Absolutely, the news went dead before the election on this, couldn’t have it leaked so that the “Chosen One,” might have his chance for reelection messed up.

    Why sticking with the embassy line of questioning…it was not an embassy.

  6. All of the above are most likely correct: Clintons lie as a genetic trait,
    This “embassy” was CIA and running guns to Syrian Muslim brotherhood. She “takes full responsibility” but cannot tell the truth and finally, we have a muslim president aligned with the muslim brotherhood…just check out 17 F-16s and 200 Abrams tanks to Egypt TODAY..a GIFT…not even a SALE…on top of 1.4 BILLION of YOUR taxpayers’ dollars to Muslim brotherhood president MORSI. Where and WHO do you think these arms are going to TAKE OUT? Syria? Lebanon? UHHHHHHHHHHHH…?Israel. Americans…especially those of you with Jewish roots…wake up! Americans…if any are left, can’t you see? Can’t you understand? Can’t you react?!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s