Retired U.S. Admiral Says Iran Deal Is A Sham, Calls For Obama’s Impeachment


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Only fools negotiate with terrorists, John Kerry and Barack Obama are masters of the “Fools Game,” and little else.

Most of what we think we know about the U.S. Constitution is incorrect.

Michael Badnarik and Sheriff Mack: Rattling the Sheriffs Cages !

 

IMPEACH-FOR-TREASON

A recurring theme in many of the postings below is the desire among many for the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama is a complete fraud as were those who put him in place.

Can Obama be arrested and tried for treason?

Obama is not exempt from the law, so he can be legally arrested for the same reasons as any other person in the United States.

(The Supreme Court so found in relation to the recent unpleasantness related to the current President’s affairs. The President’s lawyers argued that he could not be made to testify on a lawsuit while he was President.

The Supreme Court decreed otherwise, stating that the President was not exempted from the laws that applied to all citizens.)

The practicalities involved may be something else. The President is protected by the Secret Service, and it is not likely that any law officer will be allowed to simply walk up to the President and place him under arrest.

If it ever came to arresting the President, it would be a very delicate situation.  The matter would likely be legally dragged out so that any actual arrest (if justified) would take place after the President leaves office, either after the end of the term, resignation, or removal from office as a result of impeachment actions.

America Resists

By

 16187030413_7b27cf0080_k-1140x641

On Sunday, media reported that six world powers reached a provisional agreement on key parts of a deal that is meant to curtail Iran’s nuclear program.

Western diplomats in Switzerland reported that Iran had “more or less” agreed to reduce the number of its centrifuge machines by more than two-thirds and to ship abroad most of its stockpile of nuclear material.

Iranian diplomats immediately denied the reports and said that they were ‘pure journalistic speculation.’ Israeli radio Reshet Beth quoted the head of Iranian team as saying that Iran categorically rejects any exporting of their stockpiles.

Later, a French official in Lausanne angrily knocked down the report and said it was totally false.

The New York Times also confirmed the Reshet Beth report and quoted Iranian official Abbas Araqchi, who said “The export of stocks of enriched uranium is not in our program, and we do not intend sending them abroad. There is no question of sending the stocks abroad.”

The revelation that Iran is now insisting on retaining the fuel could raise a potential obstacle at a critical time in the talks.

And for critics of the emerging deal in Congress, in Israel and in Sunni Arab nations like Saudi Arabia, the prospect of leaving large amounts of nuclear fuel in Iran, in any form, is bound to intensify their already substantial political opposition”, The New York Times report.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

There Is Only One Way to Stop Obama from Setting Jihadists Free : Impeach Him


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


The impeachment process was put into the U.S. Constitution for a very specific reason. 

berg worth it

If congress refuses to use it in this situation with a “Sitting Resident,” who has committed numerous High Crimes and Misdemeanors, than why is it there?

Published originally in January of this year, the article is more relevant than ever.

 

e22fad25651d93d0706d1b617c9824bd9ae44bfe68ca601cf80af9c23eb1cc5f_large

National Review Online

By Andrew C. McCarthy

March 31, 2015

Short of impeachment, there is really nothing Congress can do. You’re not going to like this. Our commander-in-chief is recklessly releasing  jihadists from Guantanamo Bay.

The president’s Bush-deranged base is buoyed by the all-out effort to fulfill his vow to shut down the detention camp. But the vast majority of Americans remain opposed, and increasingly alarmed.

The pace of releases has surged since November’s midterm elections, with over two-dozen detainees sprung — aiding the enemy even as the terror threat intensifies. But if you want it stopped, the president has to be impeached.

Important historical read below.

Continue reading

A new beginning for Hillary: Prison!


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is known for his strong public interest advocacy in furtherance of ethics in government and individual freedoms and liberties.

During his tenure at Judicial Watch, he obtained a court ruling that Bill Clinton committed a crime, the first lawyer ever to have done so against an American president.

Hillary-Clinton-in-jail-EDITEDNope, sorry Hillary and quite frankly no one cares.

It’s really this simple: “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

 

RenewAmerica

By Larry Klayman

Hillary Clinton recently gave a speech and joked, in the context of the email scandal, that she needs a “new beginning” with the press.

Right on, Ms. Hillary does need a new beginning: to be sent to prison.

Legal challenges facing Hillary Clinton are getting hotter, starting with a case on appeal I will argue Thursday before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. What is coming soon may be more significant than all of the whirlwinds around Hillary that have come before.

On April 2, I will argue to the appeals court that the U.S. Department of State withheld documents that I asked for under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

A big reason why the documents were withheld was because they were hidden on Hillary Clinton’s private email account in her Chappaqua residence.
I will ask the appeals court to send the case back to the U.S. District Court and order that the computer file server be taken into custody by a neutral forensic computer expert under the direction of the Court, to reconstruct and release responsive email records.
Entire article below.

United States House of Representatives wants Hillary under oath


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot. At the end of the day, to quote her evilness:

                               

“What difference does it make?”Hillary Clinton delivers remarks during the 2015 Toner Prize for Excellence in Political Reporting award in WashingtonHillary is a serial liar, a psychopath and perjurer what possible reason would she have to change. **Benghazi panel summons Clinton**

March 31, 2015
 Hillary+and+Benghazi
 

A House panel Tuesday formally requested Hillary Clinton to testify about the private server and email account she used while serving as secretary of state.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a request to Clinton’s personal attorney, David E. Kendall, requesting that Clinton appear before the committee no later than May 1 for a transcribed interview about the server and email.

 The long, complicated story of Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi subpoena

The request comes after Kendall told Gowdy that the server had been wiped clean and that it would be impossible to recover the 30,000 emails Clinton deleted last year.

Gowdy, in his request to Kendall, also asked Clinton to “reconsider” her refusal to turn over the server to a neutral third-party, which he called “highly unusual, if not unprecedented.”

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Muslim Terrorist and former National Guardsman Plotted Mass Murder of 150 Soldiers in USA


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It’s heartening to see that the FBI and Homeland Security are still capable of saving lives from the evil deeds of Islamic Jihadists.

 

fbi_homeland_security_dhs_logo_seal_1115707_fullwidth

 March 31, 2015

Illinois-National-Guard-Bomb-Plot-Hasan-Jonas-IP
Illinois Army National Guard Readiness Center in Joliet, Illinois (Photo © Reuters)

A National Guardsman and his cousin have been arrested for plotting to attack US soldiers on a base in Illinois. If it had gone according to plan, up to 150 people could have been killed.

Hasan Edmonds, 22, was an Illinois National Guardsman serving with the 634th Brigade Support Battalion as a supply specialist. Jonas Edmonds, 29, planned to use Hasan’s uniform to enter the Joliet Armory, where Hasan’s National Guard unit was based. There he would attack using grenades and AK-47s.

For his part, Hasan intended to fly out to Cairo and from there attempt to join the Islamic State, where he intended to use his military training to assist the Islamist terror group.

Originally both men had intended to fly out to Syria, but Jonas has a previous conviction for armed robbery and therefore doubted he would be able to leave the country.

Hasan was arrested on Wednesday night while trying to board a plane at Chicago Midway International Airport. Jonas was arrested two hours later at his home in Aurora, Illinois.

Both men have been charged with conspiring to provide material support and resources to a foreign terrorist organization. They face up to 15 years imprisonment each.

Hasan joined the National Guard in August 2011, according to Lt. Col. Brad Leighton, an Illinois National Guard spokesman. He was responsible for ordering uniforms and other equipment.

The FBI coordinated with the National Guard on the case, leading to Hasan’s work being altered to deny him access to any sensitive information or potentially dangerous equipment.

The FBI became aware of the plot after Hasan communicated with an undercover agent posing as an Islamic extremist via Facebook. They discussed Hasan’s plan to travel to Syria and carry out attacks there.

Documents submitted to court by the prosecution record Hasan as saying: “With the U.S., no matter how many you kill they will keep coming unless the soldiers and the American public no longer have the will to fight. If we can break their spirits we will win.”

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Why would congress on both sides of the aisle have tried to remove the Natural Born Citizen Clause for president beginning in 1975?


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot

To say the very least this is an interesting story of the dates that this happened.

Please see: “Why the DNC failed to certify Obama as eligible in most states.”

obama-fraud-600x370

We are left wanting to know why.

Obama Was Hand-Picked, Was NOT a Natural Born Citizen, Congress Knew It, and Tried to Protect Him.

williams092509-2Even in the primary filings, Obama filed documents like the one above filed in Arkansas, which certifies absolutely nothing and isn’t even dated correctly at the signature line, also received from the Election Commission in Arkansas in November 2007, but allegedly signed by Obama in November 2008.

1510815_913490282030545_6478399309582928829_n

The D.C. Clothesline

The further I travel down this rabbit hole, the more I feel divorced from the good conservative people who I choose to call my own. I hold some stories back from our readers.

My thought is that people have a hard enough time embracing the basic fact that our government is corrupt on both sides of the aisle.

If you knew how corrupt I thought these people really were, I feel like you’d rush to the phone and soon bad men would show up to haul me off in a straight jacket.

Do they still do that?

Regardless, today I want to show you something that might leave you questioning everything around you.

Welcome to my world.

In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural-born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President.

Why is that important?

Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record.

Remarkably, it just so happened to coincide with the meteoric rise of a man named Barack Obama who currently sits in the People’s House.

I am about to share with you a brilliant piece of research from the Article II Political Action Committee. After reading it the foremost question on my mind is, “If the natural-born citizen definition only requires one citizen parent then why did they seemingly try so hard to change the law for Barack Obama?”

There are multiple links to official congressional documents throughout, contained in the research below, so I would urge you to draw your own conclusions.

But from my point of view this research either strongly, or at least partly, validates the following conclusions:

  1. Barack Obama was hand-picked to be President.
  2. Some members of Congress, on both sides, understood that Obama was not “natural-born” and tried to pass laws to pave the way for his arrival.
  3. In the end they used a deflection tactic to shine light on John McCain’s eligibility status, hoping that Obama’s own status would not be brought into question.

In the case of Congressman Dana Rohrabacher and other like minded Republicans, this was done in deference to then-governor Schwarzenegger.

He was also thinking of John McCain’s birthplace. This entire issue has long since been dropped.  Source:  Press Secretary for Congressman Roharabacher, Ken Grubbs.

It appears to have worked.

See entire article below.

Continue reading

Pattern emerges in Clinton document flap


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalism, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The Clinton’s have always thought of themselves as above the law.

Laws are made for the “Cake eaters,” among us.

ded4a770d081a7a7ad072fb6a8fe1b3aHillary Clinton caught in a web of deception regarding official documents. Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

It’s this exact mindset that will lead to Hillary’s inability to carry the Democrat flag for president in 2016.

Once the press turns on her scandals of the past and all of her gates, she will not be able to articulate a positive agenda for the country, as if the Democrats ever had one that didn’t fail.

At the absolute minimum Hillary Clinton is guilty of Obstructing Justice as she knowingly destroyed information that would have been used against her.

The Examiner

Anthony Martin

March 30, 2015

The unusual circumstances surrounding Hillary Clinton‘s private Internet server and the disappearance of thousands of official emails and documents only serve to point to a pattern of behavior that precludes any possibility of trust. The Clinton’s have been down this road before under highly unusual circumstances.

In the current document flap, Clinton was asked by U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy — who chairs the House Committee that is investigating Clinton — to provide tens of thousands of emails from her personal server.

Clinton used the server to conduct official government business, bypassing the official government server at the State Department. Officials are required by federal law to turn over to the U.S. government all official documents and emails. Clinton admitted to having such documents on her private server while Secretary of State but claimed she had turned them all in when she left office.

It turns out that Hillary had not turned over all of the pertinent emails, leading Gowdy to request that the rest of the emails be provided to his committee as part of the investigation.

Some time later Clinton informed Gowdy that she had scrubbed the server free of all documents, emails and all. Gowdy responded by noting that such actions could be felonies. It is a major mistake for anyone in government to underestimate Gowdy.

Not only did he begin his law career as a Department of Justice attorney, but he later became a longtime state’s attorney in his district in South Carolina, to which he was repeatedly reelected. Gowdy gained a reputation of being a no-nonsense prosecutor who tenaciously went after criminals with little or no trepidation.

Perhaps it will turn out that the biggest mistake Hillary makes with regard to the investigation into her Benghazi fiasco is attempting to take on Gowdy. Time will tell. But one thing Gowdy has on his side going forward is the fact that the Clintons have been down this road before, culminating in missing official documents and charges leveled against a top aide.

In 2005, for example, longtime Clinton associate and National Security Adviser Sandy Berger was charged with taking Clinton administration documents out of the National Archives.

But these were not merely official documents. They were top classified documents that by law were to stay housed at the National Archives.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Would anyone with a functioning brain believe what is presented below?


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It has never been suggested at this site that Obama has a functioning brain.

His goal, as his actions have shown is to bring America to her knees while helping his Muslim brothers.

Iran-Nuclear-Program

Negotiating in good faith with terrorists?  A completely absurd proposition.

Taking out their entire nuclear development plants with bunker busting bombs would be the first step in the right direction.

While the world powers have been negotiating with Iran in good faith, its leaders have been driving forward with their plans to develop nuclear weapons.

With nuclear warheads in their possession, the radical regime in Tehran will be able to threaten US allies and even the US homeland.

After watching the clip, you can quickly and easily write your representatives asking them to take action.

No Nukes For Iran! We prepared an e-mail and will send it for you to your elected officials. Our system will always allow you to preview the e-mail before it sends it. Make your voice count! It should take less than a minute.

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: