Is King Obama Trying To Change Name Of MAJOR American Holiday By Decree?


Anything is possible when Obama is “Opposed” by the “Go along to get along,” type of Republicans who continue to troll the halls of congress

This is likely another piece of propaganda but if real could start something like the Boston Tea Party.

The caller into Joe’s show was right, these people are not interested by in large in assimilating they are looking to game the system and likely to change our existing laws once they are on the Democrats gravy train.

 

Mad World News

March 6, 2015
As the executive order train continues to circle the tracks unhindered, it seems President Obama could be on his way to making a significant change to American culture. According to reports, “Thanksgiving” could be changed in the near future to be called “Celebrate Immigrants Day.” 

1-The-King-Barack-Obama-And-His-Jester-78130

You don’t mind, do you America?

The remarks came about via Susan Payne during an interview with radio talk show host Joe Miller of KOAN. Taking part in a conference call with the White House, Payne said many participants were urging Obama to enact an executive order to change the name of Thanksgiving and dedicate it to illegal aliens.

Even worse yet, she said she got the gist that this would become a reality after this “amnesty mill” was complete.

As most of America knows, the House passed legislation authorizing funding for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the end of the fiscal year, according to Western Journalism. As it turns out, Obama’s executive order on amnesty passed through, leaving him ultimately victorious in his unconstitutional pursuit.

You know, for Obama being a “constitutional scholar,” he doesn’t have much respect for his area of study.

“Once this is all finished, there should be another executive order that changes Thanksgiving to ‘Celebrate Immigrants Day,’” Payne went on to explain. “I was about ready to blow my top when I heard that.”

The worst thing in all this is the fact that Obama has been slowly chiseling away at American culture from the get go. First referring to “Christmas” as the “Holiday season” and “Easter” as “spring break,” it seems that he’s intent on a major overhaul.

It isn’t too far of a stretch to say that Obama is trying to destroy Christian themed tradition all the while enabling Muslim culture where it isn’t wanted. Then again, he isn’t alone in his efforts.

According to Payne, calls were coming in from all around America. As described in her own words, the attitude of the callers seemed to entail, “How can we make life better for an illegal alien? And basically kicking the citizen out to the curb.”

 

Continue reading

Rattlesnake Logic: Jihadists v Rattlesnakes


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, Infidel and Patriot

 

The United States will not defeat the Islamic State using out dated rules of engagement in keeping with the Geneva Conventions when The Islamic State doesn’t recognize them and if they did they would not abide by them.

The 2016 Presidential race must be won by a Republican, as progressive Marxists have proved one thing conclusively, they only know how to pick the wrong side and lose !

 

War-on-terror-actually-aimed-at-Islam

Desert Musings

H/T Ms. Lorra B.

I received this as an email this morning from a friend of mine. Makes all the sense in the world!

As long as we insist on maintaining the “moral high ground” we will NEVER win the war Islamic Jihadists and the Islamic State.

We are in a conflict in which we absolutely INSIST in playing by the rules against a maniacal group who have NO rules!

After the Boston bombing the news media spent days and weeks trying to determine why these men did what they did.

They want to know what America did(!) to make these brothers so angry with us.

They want to know why these men were not arrested before they did something so terrible. The media is in a tizzy about this new era of homegrown radicals and about why and how they can live among us and still hate us.

A friend of mine from Texas explained it all to me: “Here in west Texas, I have
rattlesnakes on my place, living among us.

 

rattlesnake_striking.img_

 

 

I have killed a rattlesnake on the front porch. I have killed a rattlesnake on the backporch.

I have killed rattlesnakes in the barn, in the shop and on the driveway. In
fact, I kill every rattlesnake I encounter.

I kill rattlesnakes because I know a rattlesnake will bite me and inject me with
poison.

I don’t stop to wonder WHY a rattlesnake will bite me; I know it WILL bite me because it’s a rattlesnake and that’s what rattlesnakes do. I don’t try to reason with a rattlesnake or have a “meaningful dialogue” with it.

 

rattlesnake-strike
I just kill it. I don’t try to get to know the rattlesnake better so I can find a way to live with the rattlesnakes and convince them not to bite me. I just kill them.
I don’t quiz a rattlesnake to see if I can find out where the other snakes are, because (a) it won’t tell me and (b) I already know they live on my place. So, I just kill the rattlesnake and move on to the
next one.

I don’t look for ways I might be able to change the rattlesnake to a non-poisonous rat
snake…I just kill it. Oh, and on occasion, I accidentally kill a rat snake because I
thought it was a rattlesnake at the time.
Also, I know for every rattlesnake I kill, two more are lurking out there in the brush.
In my lifetime I will never be able to rid my place of rattlesnakes.

Do I fear them? Not really. Do I respect what they can do to me and my family? Yes!!
Because of that respect, I give them the fair justice they deserve….I kill them… As a country, we should start giving more thought to the fact that these jihadists are telling the world their goal is to kill Americans and destroy our way of life.

They have just posted two graphic videos on the internet showing them beheading Americans.
They are serious. They are exactly like rattlesnakes. It is high time for us to start
acting accordingly!

I love this country. It’s the government I’m
afraid of!

Look who’s new in the White House!

 

muslim-brotherhood-white-house

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arif Alikhan, Assistant Secretary for Policy
Development for the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security

Mohammed Elibiary, Homeland Security Adviser

Rashad Hussain, Special Envoy to the
Organization of the Islamic Conference(OIC)

Salam al-Marayati, Obama Adviser and founder
of the Muslim Public Affairs Council and is
its current executive director

Imam Mohamed Magid, Obama’s Sharia Czar from
the Islamic Society of North America Eboo
Patel, Advisory Council on Faith-Based
Neighborhood Partnerships

This is flat-out scary!

The foxes are now officially living in the
hen-house…

Now ask me why I am very concerned!

Do you feel OK with this?

Go to bed tonight…sleep well!

Continue reading

Audio Released PROVES Obama Is ‘Going After’ Guns


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

 

This will come as no shock to those who frequent this site.

 

Molon+Labe

Obama and his goons have been the biggest anti Second Amendment junta to ever occupy the White House.

Will they be able to pull this off?  Not in their wildest delusions.

They were put in office to defend the Constitution and continually fail to do so !

Not to worry, Obama and his progressives will be long gone before any such nonsense could ever happen.

March 5, 2015

Mad World News:

H/T Lorra B.

Obama and his administration haven’t kept it a secret that they’d like for guns to be all out banned, despite them being explicitly protected by the Constitution. However, he’s found his fair share of loopholes and a recently released recording proves he’s actively “going after” guns in any way he can.

d13

For those unaware, Operation Choke Point is a program spearheaded by the Department of Justice (DOJ) intended to combat fraudulent businesses or anything else they simply object to. Coincidentally (or maybe not so much) businesses pertaining to guns have been caught in the DOJ’s crosshair, making transactions extremely difficult.

In other words, if they can’t stop you from owning guns outright, they’ll make it literally impossible to buy them.

 

attachment

This shouldn’t come as any shock given that the DOJ, at the time of Operation Choke Point’s initiation, was run by Eric Holder, who had no problem ordering his goons to “brainwash” the public into thinking guns are bad. In other words, the Obama administration has a clear anti-gun track record, leaving no doubt that Operation Choke Point was intended to snare guns in its trap.

The Daily Caller has obtained a recording provided to them by the U.S. Consumer Coalition, which proves the Obama administration’s gun grabbing goal even more. According to The Daily Caller the audio is conversation that transpired “between Alex Bacon, president of the ETF Network payment processor, and Brennan Appel, owner of the Global Hookah Distributors tobacco-products company.”

The store owner kicks off the conversation by noting that Bank of America cut them loose after 12 years of business together. Appel’s payment processor, Bacon, explained to him all about Operation Choke Point, saying the government has taken unilateral action allowing them to make the lives of anyone they don’t like “miserable.”

Saying the government is acting “of their own free will,” Bacon went on to state, “[T]hey’re going after clinics, they’re going after collection agencies, they’re going after guns dealers, ammunition dealers, payment processors.”

Continue reading

“Point and Shoot”: An Expertly Woven Compilation of an Almost Unbelievable Life


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, Patriot and Infidel.

 

Point and Shoot won the Best Documentary Film at the Tribeca Film Festival.

 

point_and_shoot_ver2

 

It speaks volumes, that in his documentary Matt Van Dyke says when caught up in the Lybian revolt, he had more friends than in the United States.

This is quite telling about the youth in our country who see themselves as disenfranchised and not fitting in.

Can anything be done about it?  Not likely unless the Islamic Cult called Islam , those participating in overt and covert jihad and welcome Sharia are exterminated from the entire world.

 

hero_PointandShoot-2014-1

An American sets out with his motorbike to find both adventure and his sense of manhood, leading him on an extraordinary journey he could not have imagined, including fighting in the Libyan Revolution.

In the new war documentary “Point and Shoot,” filmmaker Marshall Curry provokes viewers with a loaded question: did Matt Van Dyke do the right thing? Van Dyke is an American civilian who set out to document his backpacking adventures across Africa, and wound up becoming a symbol of the Libyan revolt against Gaddafi’s oppressive regime.

Curry periodically reminds viewers that he’s at least a smidge skeptical of Van Dyke by tentatively questioning his motives, like when he asks Van Dyke what he thinks of people who will say he should have fled Libya after being imprisoned by Gaddafi loyalists for six months. But more often than not, Curry doesn’t give us much to judge his subject by beyond anecdotal details and non-committal introspection.

 

 

movieposter

NY Times

The ghost of Ernest Hemingway hovers over Marshall Curry‘s new documentary, a profile of amateur filmmaker and revolutionary Matthew VanDyke. Or, rather, the novelist’s name is perhaps the best way to isolate and identify what is going on beneath this formally simple but thematically intricate film. Point and Shoot is a 21st century incarnation of some very old ideas, fervently held conceptions of what it is to be a man and an American on the world stage. The word “profile” isn’t particularly sufficient as a description, either. This is not simply a document, it is an entire life.

In 2006, VanDyke left Baltimore. He took his motorcycle, his video camera and his Obsessive Compulsive Disorder on a trip to Morocco and did not come back for three years. It was to be a “crash course in manhood.” He crisscrossed North Africa, went across into the Near East and eventually rode all the way to Afghanistan. After that he served as an embedded journalist in Iraq, where he encountered modern warfare for the first time. His last significant stop was Qaddafi’s Libya, then officially not an option for American tourists. He snuck in illegally, made a number of close friends, and felt at home. When he finally returned to the United States he was exhausted, if fulfilled.

Along the way he took hours and hours of video of himself, modeled not after the great American adventure novels but rather the travel films of Australian adventurer Alby Mangels. Point and Shoot is a simple combination of original footage and a retrospective interview conducted by Curry, added to the travel videos as voice over narration. As the videos unfold, woven together by Curry, VanDyke’s deconstruction and re-imagination of his own identity come to the fore. Always alone but always recording himself, he is acting on such a subtle level that it can be hard to see how this performance gradually morphs him. The distillation of this footage is essentially chronological and uncomplicated, but as such illustrates VanDyke’s journey from curiosity to militancy with remarkable ease.

And then the main event. In February 2011 the Libyan Revolution began. VanDyke was home in Maryland, communicating with his friends over the web and learning first hand about the atrocities being committed by Qaddafi’s regime in its struggle to keep a lid on the unrest. In an instant he made the decision to leave Baltimore and go help, however he could. He flew to Egypt, found someone to smuggle him over the border into Libya, and joined the revolution in Benghazi. Again accompanied by his camera, he documented history even as he participated for the first time.

As is probably evident, the greatest strength of this documentary is the unique, compelling and sometimes troubling nature of VanDyke’s extensive travelogue. The virtues of Curry’s direction are subtle, perhaps not easily apparent. The vast majority of the film is footage taken by its subject, arranged in a way that furthers a narrative without getting bogged down in details. It never feels as if Curry is struggling to keep up.

 

Point-and-Shoot

 

The only time of real stasis, VanDyke’s six months of captivity, is relayed to the audience through a breathtaking animated sequence. Artist Joe Posner, who also worked on Curry’s If a Tree Falls, captures the delirium brought on by solitary confinement with a bewildering terror. The real bugs on the walls and the extravagances of the prisoner’s fantasies are blurred and whirled around, finding a twisting energy even in the film’s only full stop.

On the whole, however, Point and Shoot does not push itself too far. Curry does not ask VanDyke many difficult questions, choosing instead to let his life stand on its own. This also leaves a lot to the audience as well, as far as those big questions about America and masculinity. It has been a long time since Hemingway’s dispatches from death of the Spanish Republic. In light of our two long wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the adventuring American abroad, fighting for freedom and Democracy, is an idea with an awful lot of baggage. VanDyke’s elision of this with the pursuit of manhood is, to say the least, something worth unpacking.

Yet Curry makes the choice to only touch, very quickly and lightly, on this sort of nuance. Point and Shoot is an exceptionally cut together presentation rather than an interrogation or even an examination of VanDyke’s life on the road to revolution. This has little to do with its emotional resonance or narrative strength, both of which could withstand any social, political or cultural assault. It is simply that by resisting the urge to introduce that sort of confrontation, Curry may have missed a shot at something truly extraordinary.

 

 

############

Continue reading

Did Hillary Clinton commit a felony when she established personal Email account and moved servers to her own home?


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

 

According to a segment on “The Kelly File,” last evening, Megan Kelly dropped a bombshell on Hillary Clinton’s secret Email account.

Does this look like a government email address to you?

hdr22

 

No at all, Hillary’s would likely be broomflyer.gov

 

images

Investigations are underway. 

If she is found to have kept government data on her own servers at her home in Chappaqua, NY she could be guilty of a felony that includes up to a three year prison sentence and no longer be able to hold any office in the United States of America under federal law.

 

It’s time for Hillary to be hoisted on her own petard, she’s an elitist who believes the law doesn’t apply to her, but only the cake eaters in her, ‘It Takes a Village” delusion.

 

@ Megan Kelly.us

 

Under federal law … letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. … The use of private email accounts is supposed to be limited to emergencies…

“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high ranking official at an executive branch agency solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business,” said Mr. Baron, who worked at the agency from 2000 to 2013.

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

See the devastating prognostication by Dick Morris on Hillary’s conundrum immediately below.

The NY Times puts this mildly:

The revelation about the private email account echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy.

As Robert Heinlein observed,

“Secrecy is the keystone to all tyranny.”

Shrillary was so secretive regarding her emails that she actually ran her own computer system to ensure they were kept hidden from the public:

The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Rodham Clinton’s emails – on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state – traced back to an Internet service registered to her family’s home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press.

The highly unusual practice of a Cabinet-level official physically running her own email would have given Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, impressive control over limiting access to her message archives. It also would distinguish Clinton’s secretive email practices as far more sophisticated than some politicians, including Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin, who were caught conducting official business using free email services operated by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc.

This wasn’t a minor slip up as with Mittens and Sarah Palin. Shrillary went far out of the way to skirt the rules.

Too bad Clintons aren’t expected to obey the law, like the fallen General David Petraeus. Judge Andrew Napolitano says Shrillary could be charged with violating the same law the hapless Petraeus pled guilty to breaking.

Continue reading

UPDATE: Democrats Aren’t Rushing To Defend Hillary Clinton


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

 

Wouldn’t it be great to see, as Rev Jeremiah Wright said it, “The Chickens come home to roost?”

Obama will certainly go down as the worst occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in history.

 However, nobody has it coming to her like the “Broad.” Hillary Clinton.

 

130604065403-early-hillary-clinton-project-pantsuit-00001515-horizontal-gallery

 

This reporter would not call a woman a broad, but Hillary is literally and  figuratively speaking very broad. 

Hillary exceeded at nothing while she served as Secretary of State, her staff could come up without a single accomplishment of note, thus mirroring her lack luster performance as the junior Senator from New Your.

And Hillary should have been saying this below for what benefit to America?   How about none what so ever!

Well it’s time for the pathological liar and serial perjurer to get hers and we can only hope it will lead to the end of the so-called, “Clinton dynasty,” a figment of their imaginations to be sure.

God Damn America?  I don’t think so, but if he chooses to damn Hillary she will have great company in the fires of hell.

 

00000001 a obamas liars

 

Hillary Clinton is responsible for the deaths of our Ambassador in Benghazi, a U.S. Diplomat and two Navy SEALS.

None of those questioning her in her congressional hearing on the matter thought to get her on the record with a simple question.  Mrs. Clinton who gave you the order to stand down and not rescue Americans?
 

 

The National Journal

After e-mail revelations, some Democrats are dodging questions more than offering Clinton cover

 New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen repeated the same refrain later, saying “I don’t know enough about it to appropriately respond.”

As the elevator doors closed, Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware said at about 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, “I literally don’t know anything about her home internet system.”

And as Sen. Ron Wyden—a strong advocate for government transparency—headed toward the Senate office buildings, he said he was busy at the Supreme Court all Wednesday morning.

“I haven’t had a chance to go through that. … I’m going to have to go onto health,” as other reporters waited to ask their questions. “I just don’t have time for that one,” Wyden said, indicating the question could be revisited after he’d had more time to read the latest Clinton news.

Senators Claire McCaskill and Joe Manchin, however, neither avoided the question nor toed the party line. While, McCaskill too wanted to know more, she said she is “focused” on making sure the information is publicly available somewhere.

“The most important thing is to make sure the information was archived in some way and made available in some way,” McCaskill said. When probed by a reporter as to what happens if the e-mails are not archived somewhere, McCaskill said”It has to be now.”

Manchin also had heard the news. He wants to see what other facts, if any, come out of the controversy, but “it sounds like somebody made a mistake.”

But did that mean Clinton herself made a mistake? “I don’t know. We’ll find out,” he said. “I guess that someone must have advised her that this is how other people have operated.” It’s a position he’s been in himself, Manchin said, when he asks advisors what to do, and they respond with how a task was performed previously.

“So, I don’t know,” Manchin said. “I don’t know the facts. I really don’t know the facts.”

Even Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking member on the Select Committee on Benghazi, said he was still wading through the news and was unsure how it would affect his committee’s probe. He said, however, that his job on the committee has never been simply to protect his party’s potential presidential nominee.

“We will see, but I want to be clear, I am not trying to defend Hillary Clinton,” Cummings said. “I am trying to defend the truth … we have some things we are going to try and figure out.”

Already, Cummings’ counterpart, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, said he would take all legal recourse to get Clinton’s emails.

“We’ve had new revelations even before this, we just have not trumpeted them,” Gowdy said. The committee was preparing Wednesday to subpoena emails on Benghazi from Clintonemail.com accounts and staffers’ personal accounts, The Washington Post reported Wednesday afternoon.

Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona said Clinton needs to respond quicker to avoid revisiting the issue.

“I hate the idea that it would revitalize this whole Benghazi investigations when they were dead, and they were not only conclusive, nothing was found,” Grijalva said. “So the sooner the participants in this case, Hillary and the State Department, provide full disclosure, the better off we’re going to be.”

Some top House Democrats, such as Reps. Joe Crowley and Steve Israel, were quick to Clinton’s defense.

“I don’t believe that the secretary of state should be responsible for figuring out whether it was dot gov vs. dot com, and quite honestly I don’t think most Americans wake up in the morning thinking about it,” Israel, the former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman, said. “I’m sure the Republicans will now create a special select committee on dot gov, that’s what they do, and nobody should be surprised that they’re responding the way that they are.”

The Clinton controversy highlights a major vulnerability that has plagued the Clinton family before. As Hillary Clinton attempts to rebrand herself and gear up for a retooled 2016 campaign, Republicans will continue to paint her as a political machine, a politician so overtly concerned about her rise to the Oval Office that she was willing to safeguard every correspondence to protect her public persona.

“The Clinton’s always have a way of not telling us something that is bad news,” said Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Potential 2016 Republican challenger Sen. Rand Paul said that the emails fit a pattern of behavior.

“I think we need to be very careful about elected officials obeying the law,” Paul said. “The thing that concerns me more than the emails is the fact that she has been receiving money from foreign countries … the Constitution specifically prohibits people from taking gifts while in office.”

Sen. John McCain said Clinton could have simply avoided the controversy by not sending emails, the policy he holds.

“I don’t email at all,” McCain says. “I have other people and I tell them to email because I am just always worried I might say something. I am not the most calm and reserved person you know? I am afraid I might email something that in retrospect I wish I hadn’t.”

 

 

############

Continue reading

The Nobel Committee seems to regret giving Obama the Peace Prize


crew-2231

 

 

March 4, 2015

Rare:

Zero Hedge

By Bonnie Kristian

In what has been described as an “unprecedented” decision, the Nobel Committee has chosen to replace its chair, Thorbjoern Jagland, after a six-year tenure—and his role in giving President Obama the Nobel Peace Prize back in 2009 is a big reason why.

In what has been described as an “unprecedented” decision, the Nobel Committee has chosen to replace its chair, Thorbjoern Jagland, after a six-year tenure—and his role in giving President Obama the Nobel Peace Prize back in 2009 is a big reason why.

The Associated Press reports:

Jagland will remain a member of the voting panel but was a contentious leader, attracting criticism for his dual role as committee chairman and head of the European Council when the prize was awarded to the European Union in 2012. His leadership also was clouded by the decision to give the prize to Barack Obama in 2009 after he had just been elected president, and the 2010 prize to the jailed dissident Liu Xiabo drew fury from China. (Emphasis added.)

As the Zero Hedge blog notes, this move seems inevitably connected to the Committee’s regret over giving the Peace Prize to Obama, who “has since the aware become a neo-con warhawk, who has put some of the most bloodthirsty [R]epublicans to shame, and whose actions (and lack thereof) have led to not only global conflict intensity spiking to a 7-year high, but have generated untold riches to the shareholders of the military industrial complex.”

Continue reading

Artist Creates Controversial Painting of Obama Playing Golf while the back ground is exploding


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

 

This is much like the artist who painted Bill Clinton’s picture which hangs in the National Archives and the Clinton’s are trying to no avail to take down.

Of course it was Monica Lewinsky’s seaman stained dress, Obama probably has a couple of those as well but he left them at his local D.C. bath house.

 

heisrisen-categoryimage

 “He Has Risen”

Jon McNaughton is my favorite artist.  Originally he focused of beautiful religious portraits.

 

d10

“Wake Up America,” above, I proudly have hanging in my living room.

 

 

wpid-wp-1425466297123

His destruction of the U.S. Constitution is show here.

A switch has switched with in him as he has gone to eviscerating the Obama administration for destroy America at home and abroad.

In the image and video below McNaughton takes the gloves off spanking Obama hard!

 

wpid-wp-1425466280360-1

 Other images of McNaughton feature prayer, patriotism and our troops.

 

To Visit the entire Jon McNaughton Galleries images and videos Please click here.

H/T Ms. Lorra B.

Continue reading