Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Number and nature of Google execs’ White House visits raise ethical questions

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Google moved into their headquarters in Mountain View, California—better known as the Googleplex—in 2004. Today Google has more than 70 offices in more than 40 countries around the globe.  The reader will not believe some of their locations.




Google has always had a cozy relationship with the feds providing them with information they request without a warrant.

The reader must begin to wonder how dirty Google actually is, do they have ties with the CIA and NASA? 

All things are possible in the intelligence gathering community.


By on March 27, 2015

Frequent meetings between Google executives and Federal Trade Commission officials are raising questions about the FTC’s 2013 decision to drop an antitrust probe against the company.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week:

As the federal government was wrapping up its antitrust investigation of Google, Inc., company executives had a flurry of meetings with top officials at the White House and Federal Trade Commission, the agency running the probe.

Around the same time that the meetings were taking place, the FTC’s bureau of competition was compiling a report recommending that the agency take Google to court for engaging in anti-competitive tactics.

“Soon afterward,” the article claims, “the FTC closed its investigation after Google agreed to make voluntary changes to its business practices,” with the agency’s five commissioners voting unanimously not to pursue legal action.

According to visitor logs and emails reviewed by the WSJ, Google employees have met with senior officials at the White House about 230 times, “an average of roughly once a week,” since Obama took office.

Conversely, “employees of rival Comcast Corp., also known as a force in Washington, have visited the White House a total of about 20 times since Mr. Obama took office,” just one-third as many times as a single lobbyist for Google.

In a press release Wednesday, Net Competition Chairman Scott Cleland said:

See entire article below.

Continue reading

Update: Did Barack Obama work as an operative for the CIA?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Were Obama and his family operatives run by the CIA? 


As one might imagine, it is difficult if not impossible to come up with definitive answers to this question.

Perhaps along with everything else, this is an additional reason Obama sealed his records.

Boiling Frogs

Barack Obama, His Mother, and the CIA

So Why the Omission?

 In his autobiography, Dreams From My Fathers, Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as “a consulting house to multinational corporations” in New York City, and his functions as a “research assistant” and “financial writer”.

Oddly, Obama doesn’t mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of October 30, 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation. Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960.

obama-cia-recruitThe British journal, Lobster — which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters — has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji.

In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls.

After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington’s nuclear desires, was reinstated to power — R.S.K. Mara was Prime Minister or President of Fiji from 1970 to 2000, except for the one-month break in 1987.

In his book, not only doesn’t Obama mention his employer’s name; he fails to say exactly when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left — including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) it’s reasonable to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.

Adding to the wonder is the fact that his mother, Ann Dunham, had been associated during the 1970s and 80s — as employee, consultant, grantee, or student — with at least five organizations with intimate CIA connections during the Cold War: The Ford Foundation, Agency for International Development (AID), the Asia Foundation, Development Alternatives, Inc., and the East-West Center of Hawaii Much of this time she worked as an anthropologist in Indonesia and Hawaii, being in good position to gather intelligence about local communities.

As one example of the CIA connections of these organizations, consider the disclosure by John Gilligan, Director of AID during the Carter administration (1977-81). “At one time, many AID field offices were infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people. The idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas, government, volunteer, religious, every kind.”And Development Alternatives, Inc. is the organization for whom Alan Gross was working when arrested in Cuba and charged with being part of the ongoing American operation to destabilize the Cuban government.

# # # #William Blum is an American, historian and critic of United States foreign policy. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military & CIA Interventions Since World War II. He has described his life’s mission as: “If not ending, at least slowing down the American Empire. At least injuring the beast. It’s causing so much suffering around the world.Mr. Blum can be reached through his website 


Now we know that without a plausible strategy the boy who would be king has………homepage_targeted_assassinations_1







Continue reading

How Will History Judge Barack Hussein Obama?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.



In the end his sage adviser was fond of saying “What difference does it make?”



No matter who writes it, how many left or right wings they have, Obama must go down as a complete Marxist who attempted to destroy the U.S. Economy, eviscerate our military and turn America into a laughing-stock, and no longer a world-wide super power under his watch.

If members of congress who took the oath to uphold the Constitution had done so, the prince of darkness would have never darkened the door step at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

From a conspiracy theorists point of view could Obama have been put in place by puppet masters to sinister to imagine to allow Islam to take hold of the United States with the subversion of the U.S. to the word of Allah, which would be the worst of his involvements leading to another world war. 

If there is any merit to this thesis then there is going to be huge amounts of blood shed as this is the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic State. Historians may not record this for another 100-200 years, presupposing history will still be recorded in the U.S.

by Joe the Plummer

Seriously, When history takes a step back and reviews the time of President Barack Obama with an unbiased eye – they will say, “Damn Americans were really stupid back then!” (yes the majority of them mere)

Will historians lament; “How did it happen? It couldn’t be because he was black? Please tell me that Americans were smart enough to look at man/character instead of his skin color. Tell me that they didn’t vote this guy in because of this “white guilt” stuff I hear…” (yes they did and he got 95% of the black vote)obama_g_main


How can Americans vote a leader in to the highest, most honorable of positions based on skin color. Why didn’t they learn his history? Why didn’t they.. well, there’s been more than one leader voted in lawfully whose past should have had some giant red flags. (because they are ignorant and too dumb to vote)
Yes, way back in the year 2008, the education system in America was corrupt. They rewrote history with political agendas forced on the children from age four and carried all the way through to finish in college. BUT that is still not a good enough reason to vote:

( it should have been to vote the poser out of office not in)


Yes, the media was ridiculous. The news you received was slanted with whatever talking head was reporting it. News was made up for hits and ratings. They had an opinion and fed it to you. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:

Obama (so what is new from the sycophantic water boys and girls in the media, the very vast majority fly with two left wings)

Yes, Money was spent by big corporations through lobbyists in a revolving door with politicians going out one way and bribery going in the other. Tons of money from Wall Street to the Unions, with K Street buying politicians to make sure laws were made that favored them. The Unions raped their membership for dues in the pretense of working for them when in reality leadership made damn good money and lived the high life while the workers did the work. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:

Obama (Let’s not forget that Romney was an uninspiring candidate and that 4 million Republicans chose to sit the vote out)


4942824964_Obama20_20Hypocrisy2004_xlarge-2Yes Al Sharpton/Obama/Eric Holder worked hard to create more race warfare. They worked hard on telling black people that they are second class citizens. That they should get more help (control) from the government. That all white people are bad. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:Obama (no but it proves race hustling provides a lucrative income when you would otherwise be shining shoes)

Republicans were the most profligate spenders in the history of this nation between the years of 2000 – 2005 when they controlled all three branches of government. They grew deficits, debt, regulations and entertained the corrupt lobbyists like no one’s business – BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote: (this is news that politicians are corrupt on both sides of the aisle?)


We were in a genuine crisis with bankers having raped the country and getting bailed out for their trouble. The housing and mortgage industry were being ruined and gutted.  (warned by President George W. Bush that this would happen and W. was ignored.)


Even though this one was half-white, we had never had a black President in this country and putting that dark part of history behind us, even a little was a prideful thought for Americans who are on the whole, just and benevolent people. (nope not buying it for a moment)

BUT that is still not a good enough reason to vote:


… Because now – everything above is worse by ten-fold. Barack Obama and his obama-debt-two-face-500x375presidency are like food poisoning: We just have to wait until it crawls through our system in a painful, bloated and sickening fashion that it does. (to which I agree or possibly like a malignancy with resultant chemotherapy)
Maybe the folks who say Barack Obama is the best thing that ever happened to us are right? That he represents the wake up call America needed to actually realize the 50-year bleed that liberals have been taking the country down? Perhaps it does have to get worse before it gets better? (the 50% are to dumb to get it.)

If 2010 and 2014 were any indications, we still have some sense in us and some urgency, hopefully. But let’s not forget what those Republicans did when they were in charge, okay? They set the table for Pelosi, Reid and eventually – two terms of Obama, executive orders, amnesty, ObamaCare and 5 trillion more dollars of debt and counting. (It’s not there money should they care?)

This is bad. BUT that is still not a good enough reason not to strap on your bayonets and get in the parade, as Freddie Rumson would say.  When history judges Barack Hussein Obama – we’ll be on the right side. (and as Hillary Clinton would say, what difference does it make?)

Who’s with me?




Continue reading

Phone Company ‘Outraged’ By Fraud, Abuse In ‘Obamaphone’ Program

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Yep, pulling out my pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, “I find The Right To Own Cell Phones paid for by others just in front of the place where it use to say under the 2nd Amendment, that “We the People had the right to bare arms. 




I think it’s time to pop open a cool one sit back and chill as I get into the wagon and let other people pull me around. I have paid far more than my fair share of taxes, thank you very much!

January 27, 2015

Brian Maass



What a free phone?  Just sign up right here!

DENVER (CBS4) – A nationwide cellphone company distributing phones and cellphone plans in Denver as part of a massive government program says it is “outraged by the unacceptable actions” uncovered by a CBS4 undercover investigation.

The response from Total Call Mobile comes nearly three months after an undercover CBS4 investigation revealed multiple examples of fraud and cheating in the phone distribution program.

The Lifeline program is aimed at providing free cellphone service to the poor and needy. It handed out more than 13 million free cellphone plans in the first six months of 2014. In Colorado, the program handed out more than 117,000 free cellphone plans in the first half of 2014 or about 20,000 cellphones every month.

If you own a cellphone, you pay for the free phones and their wireless plans via a monthly tax on your cellphone called the Universal Service Tax. Although the Lifeline wireless program has been around since 2005 and started under President George W. Bush, it ballooned under President Obama and the phones are often referred to as Obama phones.

To qualify for one of the cellphone plans, you have to be low-income — on food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance or some other government program.

Continue reading

What if ?

crew-2231By Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Obama can redeem himself !

When he is finally run from office, he can move back to Kenya and be buried with his bony ass sticking up out of the ground so little Kenyan children can use his remains for a bike rack.


What if?  What’s the past tense for it’s already happened?

Barack Obama’s game plan has just about been fully implemented.

Congress could have stopped him and didn’t, the sheriffs could have stopped him and didn’t, the same goes for the Supreme Court.

Barack Obama is the Kenyan personification of Evil, he hates our country and always will.

Continue reading

Obama’s Month: He “Heard” America; Is It Listening to Him?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Of course Obama heard the message that America and American voters aren’t listening to him.  Does he care?  Not a bit.

He’s on a mission, to bring America to her knees economy while destroying our military capability and one of the most dangerous times in our countries history.

Real Clear Politics

By Alexis Simendinger – November 28, 2014

Barack Obama

Beijing sees Obama as a weak leader in the autumn of his final term

 Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


d3e4fee337ebfa2c640f6a706700589fObama will find he will have very little refuge anywhere he goes once he is finally booted out of the Oval Office.

Like the majority of Americans, our enemies and allies have no respect for the loser whose actions further destabilized a very dangerous world.

If he chooses to stay in the U.S. he will receive hoots and jeers from real Americans.

*Advice: Move back to Chicago or Kenya, (same thing), and he will likely do fine. 
With Obama’s lust for power he’d probably run for president of Kenya.
China is no refuge from Obama’s woes

Will a weakened Mr Obama have better luck with China? The answer is not necessarily “no”.

With the exception of North Korea, China’s neighbours are clamouring for a stronger US presence in the region. As the quip goes, Mr Xi talks like Deng Xiaoping – who opened China to the world – but acts like Mao Zedong, the imperial strongman.

Countries that were once wary of military ties with the US, such as Vietnam, India and the Philippines, are now openly courting it. Mr Obama’s pivot means 60 per cent of America’s military resources will be deployed in the Pacific – against the old 50:50 split with the Atlantic.

Second-term US presidents traditionally seek solace on the global stage. Barack Obama is no exception. Following last week’s drubbing in the US midterm elections, he lands in China on Monday for a summit with Xi Jinping. He is unlikely to find Beijing more pliable than Washington DC.

As time goes on, it becomes ever harder to separate his domestic weakness from his global standing. Even the tone is spreading. “US society has grown tired of [Obama’s] banality,” China’s semi-official Global Times said last week.Mr Xi is too polite to put it like that.

Yet there is no mistaking which of the two is on the way up. In his first year in office, Mr Obama offered Beijing a “G2” partnership to tackle the world’s big problems.

China spurned him. Mr Obama then unveiled his “pivot to Asia”. China saw it as US containment and reacted accordingly.

Its defense spending today is almost double in real terms what it was when Mr Obama first visited China in 2009.


Over the same period, the US military budget has barely kept pace with inflation.

Watch that change as Republican’s now controlling the Senate put forth legislation that Harry Reid refused to bring to the Senate for a vote.

Should Obama fail to sign said legislation, it will be just one more nail in his coffin and one of a thousand things to have helped destroy his legacy  as the worst, most corrupt “Leader,” in United States History.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Attacks Stay-at-Home Moms – “That’s Not a Choice we Want Americans to Make”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Does “The Fool,” actually believe that stay at home mom’s care what the government thinks?


Clearly in an off teleprompter moment, “The Chosen One,” went off the rails. This is a good thing, it’s the only time we know when he is telling the truth.

Indeed it “May take a village,” in the mind of Marxists like Hillary Clinton to raise children, but those of us for the most part that came from a well-functioning family with a stay at home mom seem to have done pretty well.

Can we say that now?

Who will pay for your delusions of Utopia? When you say we, you don’t mean you, you mean real “Taxpayers.”

Freedom Outpost

By 3 November 2014

President Obama was campaigning in Rhode Island when he began dissembling on the choice some women have to make between raising a family and earning to their full potential in their careers. He probably shouldn’t have gone off on this little rabbit trail, because by doing so he unmasked the wholesale contempt the Democrat Party holds for the average American woman.

Sometimes, someone, usually mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make.

The remarks come after Obama quickly backtracked earlier in the week when he implied that Michelle Obama doesn’t work. “I mean, I should point out, she is working really hard now as first lady and doesn’t get paid, but that’s a whole other thing. But — because I didn’t want her to think, like, what, I’m not working? Michelle works. I promise you.”

  1. Because really, how could a woman of any intelligence, fortitude and resolve have any desire to “JUST” be a homemaker? The Democrats hold a deep disdain for woman who would purposefully and actively choose to stay at home and care for their families. To the Democrat, your profession should be the most fulfilling thing about your life… not the family you’ve built with your mate.

    The Democrat motto for women of childbearing age is, “Let the kids be raised by the state, and go out there and earn some income for us to tax.”

    When you think about it, it is simply astounding the level of disapproval the average Democrat politician must have for conservative women.


    By the way – I don’t know how this fits in… but it kind of has to, doesn’t it? A recent study found that women with MORE children are MORE productive at work!

    A word of encouragement for my working moms: You are actually more productive than your childless peers.

    That’s the conclusion of a recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which found that over the course of a 30-year career, mothers outperformed women without children at almost every stage of the game. In fact, mothers with at least two kids were the most productive of all.

    Just the type of study a Federal Reserve Bank should be conducting, LMAO.
%d bloggers like this: