A Direct Reflection on Who He Supports:Tom Brady Won’t Be Present For Patriots’ White House Trip

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


You had to know there was something special about New England Patriots Quarterback Tom Brady. 

It’s not just the way he reads the oppositions defense as he drives the Patriots down the field. 

Seattle_Seahawks2And no it wasn’t the comeback kid who beat the Seattle Seahawks. 


Brady, clearly a man of family values has no need for the current administration rule over America.



Super Bowl XLIX - New England Patriots v Seattle SeahawksTom Brady (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images

BOSTON (CBS) — The Patriots will be honored by President Barack Obama at the White House on Thursday, but the MVP won’t be in attendance.

According to ESPN’s Mike Reiss and the Boston Herald’s Jeff Howe, Tom Brady will not be present at the White House due to a family obligation.

You can watch the ceremony live on WBZ-TV and CBSBoston.com at 2:15 p.m. (But why would you?)

Brady has attended three previous trips to the White House, in 2002, 2004 and 2005.

The quarterback earned Super Bowl MVP honors for the third time in his career when he threw four touchdowns in a 28-24 win over the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLIX.

There’s no reason to doubt Brady’s sincerity with the family commitment, though it is worth noting that White House press secretary Josh Earnest did lob an unprovoked attack on Brady’s truthfulness back in late January, when “DeflateGate” was a leading topic




Continue reading

Verifying Iran Nuclear Deal Not Possible

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, Patriot, and Infidel.


Since the U.S. abrogated the authority of inspections to the U.N. the treaty will not be worth the paper it is written on.

Once again Obama attempts to pull a fast one on Americans and our lack luster members of congress, on both sides of the aisle.


un-obama_shillary_gun-grab-plan-550x344No different from Hillary’s bogus support of the U.N. Gun Ban Treaty each have little use for the U.S. Constitution.

Article II, Section II, Clause II of the U.S. Constitution set the law for entering into a treaty with a foreign entity.

That would go as a never mind for Obama who has attempted to destroy the U.S. Constitution at every opportunity possible.

It would require 2/3 majority of both houses of congress to vote aye, and that just isn’t going to happen.Obama-constitution-burning-1

Past Iranian cheating to be codified by future accord, it’s in the Muslim genome  and commanded by the Qur’an to lie.


April 6, 2015

Despite promises by President Obama that Iranian cheating on a new treaty will be detected, verifying Tehran’s compliance with a future nuclear accord will be very difficult if not impossible, arms experts say.

“The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action will not be effectively verifiable,” said Paula DeSutter, assistant secretary of state for verification, compliance, and implementation from 2002 to 2009.

Obama said Saturday that the framework nuclear deal reached in Switzerland would provide “unprecedented verification.”

International inspectors “will have unprecedented access to Iran’s nuclear program because Iran will face more inspections than any other country in the world,” he said in a Saturday radio address.

“If Iran cheats, the world will know it,” Obama said. “If we see something suspicious, we will inspect it. So this deal is not based on trust, it’s based on unprecedented verification.”

But arms control experts challenged the administration’s assertions that a final deal to be hammered out in detail between now and June can be verified, based on Iran’s past cheating and the failure of similar arms verification procedures.

A White House fact sheet on the outline of the future agreement states that the new accord will not require Iran to dismantle centrifuges, or to remove stockpiled nuclear material from the country or convert such material into less dangerous fuel rods.

The agreement also would permit continued nuclear research at facilities built in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which Iran signed in 1970 but has violated repeatedly since at least the early 2000s.

The centerpiece for verifying Iranian compliance will be a document called the Additional Protocol of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), according to the White House.

However, the State Department’s most recent report on arms compliance, made public in July, states that Iran signed an IAEA Additional Protocol in 2003 but “implemented it provisionally and selectively from 2003 to 2006,” when Tehran stopped complying altogether.

“The framework claims that Iran will once again execute an Additional Protocol with IAEA,” said William R. Harris, an international lawyer who formerly took part in drafting and verifying U.S. arms control agreements. “This might yield unprecedented verification opportunities, but can the international community count on faithful implementation?”

Harris also said Iran could cheat by shipping secretly built nuclear arms to North Korea, based on published reports indicating Iran co-financed North Korea’s nuclear tests, and that Iranian ballistic missile test signals reportedly showed “earmarks” of North Korean guidance systems.

“So what would prevent storage of Iranian nuclear weapons at underground North Korean sites?” he asked. “If there is to be full-scope inspection in Iran, the incentives for extraterritorial R&D and storage increase.”

U.S. intelligence agencies, which will be called on to verify the agreement, also have a spotty record for estimating foreign arms programs. After erroneously claiming Iraq had large stocks of weapons of mass destruction, the intelligence community produced a 2007 National Intelligence Estimate that falsely concluded that Iran halted work on nuclear weapons in 2003.

The IAEA, in a restricted 2011 report, contradicted the estimate by stating that Iran continued nuclear arms work past 2003, including work on computer modeling used in building nuclear warheads.

White House officials who briefed reporters last week on the new framework agreement said the key to verification of the future pact will be the new IAEA protocol. The protocol will provide greater access and information on the Iranian nuclear program, including its hidden and secret sites, they said.

The nuclear facilities at Fordow, an underground facility where centrifuges will be removed, and Natanz, another major centrifuge facility, were both built in violation of the NPT and will not be dismantled.

Additionally, the nuclear facility at Parchin, where Iran is believed to have carried out most of its nuclear weapons work, is not mentioned in any of the fact sheets by name.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama oversells his non deal with Iran

crew-2231Obama oversells his alleged nuclear deal with Iran as a good thing.



If it were true no one with a functioning brain would put such and idea forth.

Remember the old commercial, “Is it real or is it Memorex?”  With Obama there is one certainty, it’s not real, he is lying.




Having missed the latest deadline for a nuclear deal with Iran, President Obama chose Thursday to make his most persuasive case yet that the deal he has not yet made is a good one.

He argued that no better option exists, given how close the Iranians are already to developing a nuclear bomb. He said that even though U.S. and Iranian negotiators failed to reach a final deal, they have agreed to a “framework” with terms that will at least appear agreeable to the layman, and which will supposedly become a final deal by June 30.

Has Obama’s concession of ground to the weaker party in negotiations ultimately been rewarded with cooperation? Has his decision to let Iran have four times as many centrifuges as originally envisioned, and to allow centrifuges to be installed in Iran’s underground facility at Fordo, produced a new era of Iranian-American friendship?

Forgive our skepticism. After all, Thursday’s announcement was merely a media event designed to put the best possible face on the fact that no deal was made by the stated deadline.


And not only was there no deal, but Obama’s account of the non-deal differed substantially from that offered by Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who took to Twitter within hours to dispute Obama’s characterization of the pace at which sanctions were supposed to be lifted — immediately, he insisted, not gradually as conditions are met.

Assuming for argument’s sake that the progress toward a deal is real, Obama seems to have succumbed to wishful thinking about Iran’s intentions. When he says, “Iran has met all of its obligations,” in an effort to sell the deal, Obama is simply not telling the truth — he is papering over a history of nuclear deal-breaking by the Islamic Republic’s regime.

That includes more than two decades of covert Iranian nuclear development, beginning in the 1980s. More recently, it included a series of calculated false and incomplete declarations of Iran’s nuclear progress. In 2003, after Iran finally came clean, or supposedly came clean, international inspectors kept discovering new and still-undeclared nuclear sites within Iran.

Much more recently, as Foreign Policy reported in December, Obama’s administration caught and quietly scolded Iran for breaking the framework that led to the current negotiations — shopping for components for its heavy-water reactor, which could be used to produce weapons-grade plutonium.

Just five months ago, Iran was caught feeding uranium gas into advanced centrifuges, again apparently violating the terms of the current framework. Last April, Iran was even caught cheating on the amount of oil it was allowed to export under the relaxed sanctions of the current framework.

“This deal is not based on trust,” Obama said Thursday. “It is based on unprecedented verification. … If Iran cheats, the world will know.”

But the thing is, Iran has been cheating, over and over and over again. That’s what Tehran’s mullahs do. Lying is in the regime’s DNA. The world has known each time it has cheated in the past, and no one has lifted a finger to do anything about it — save for the Congress that imposed tough sanctions against Obama’s will during his first term. Those sanctions brought Iran to the table, and Obama seems to be failing to exploit their effect, even though he boasted about them in yesterday announcement.

Nor can any evaluation of Iran’s trustworthiness omit the years and years of Iranian provocations by way of its auxiliary paramilitary death squads. Just hours before Obama spoke, the Iran-backed Houthi rebels continued their march through Yemen, seizing control of the presidential residence in Aden and threatening to provoke a much larger Sunni-Shiite war in the Islamic world. Other Iranian-backed militias have recently been seen starting (and restarting) war in Gaza and crushing what non-Islamist resistance there once was to Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

Perhaps there is some secret grand plan that Congress and the public cannot judge because they do not know enough — because Obama has hidden the details of talks up to this point. But there are just too many indications that Obama is in over his head and does not understand with whom he is dealing.


Number and nature of Google execs’ White House visits raise ethical questions

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Google moved into their headquarters in Mountain View, California—better known as the Googleplex—in 2004. Today Google has more than 70 offices in more than 40 countries around the globe.  The reader will not believe some of their locations.




Google has always had a cozy relationship with the feds providing them with information they request without a warrant.

The reader must begin to wonder how dirty Google actually is, do they have ties with the CIA and NASA? 

All things are possible in the intelligence gathering community.


By on March 27, 2015

Frequent meetings between Google executives and Federal Trade Commission officials are raising questions about the FTC’s 2013 decision to drop an antitrust probe against the company.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week:

As the federal government was wrapping up its antitrust investigation of Google, Inc., company executives had a flurry of meetings with top officials at the White House and Federal Trade Commission, the agency running the probe.

Around the same time that the meetings were taking place, the FTC’s bureau of competition was compiling a report recommending that the agency take Google to court for engaging in anti-competitive tactics.

“Soon afterward,” the article claims, “the FTC closed its investigation after Google agreed to make voluntary changes to its business practices,” with the agency’s five commissioners voting unanimously not to pursue legal action.

According to visitor logs and emails reviewed by the WSJ, Google employees have met with senior officials at the White House about 230 times, “an average of roughly once a week,” since Obama took office.

Conversely, “employees of rival Comcast Corp., also known as a force in Washington, have visited the White House a total of about 20 times since Mr. Obama took office,” just one-third as many times as a single lobbyist for Google.

In a press release Wednesday, Net Competition Chairman Scott Cleland said:

See entire article below.

Continue reading

Update: Did Barack Obama work as an operative for the CIA?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Were Obama and his family operatives run by the CIA? 


As one might imagine, it is difficult if not impossible to come up with definitive answers to this question.

Perhaps along with everything else, this is an additional reason Obama sealed his records.

Boiling Frogs

Barack Obama, His Mother, and the CIA

So Why the Omission?

 In his autobiography, Dreams From My Fathers, Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as “a consulting house to multinational corporations” in New York City, and his functions as a “research assistant” and “financial writer”.

Oddly, Obama doesn’t mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of October 30, 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation. Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960.

obama-cia-recruitThe British journal, Lobster — which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters — has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji.

In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls.

After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington’s nuclear desires, was reinstated to power — R.S.K. Mara was Prime Minister or President of Fiji from 1970 to 2000, except for the one-month break in 1987.

In his book, not only doesn’t Obama mention his employer’s name; he fails to say exactly when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left — including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) it’s reasonable to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.

Adding to the wonder is the fact that his mother, Ann Dunham, had been associated during the 1970s and 80s — as employee, consultant, grantee, or student — with at least five organizations with intimate CIA connections during the Cold War: The Ford Foundation, Agency for International Development (AID), the Asia Foundation, Development Alternatives, Inc., and the East-West Center of Hawaii Much of this time she worked as an anthropologist in Indonesia and Hawaii, being in good position to gather intelligence about local communities.

As one example of the CIA connections of these organizations, consider the disclosure by John Gilligan, Director of AID during the Carter administration (1977-81). “At one time, many AID field offices were infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people. The idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas, government, volunteer, religious, every kind.”And Development Alternatives, Inc. is the organization for whom Alan Gross was working when arrested in Cuba and charged with being part of the ongoing American operation to destabilize the Cuban government.

# # # #William Blum is an American, historian and critic of United States foreign policy. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military & CIA Interventions Since World War II. He has described his life’s mission as: “If not ending, at least slowing down the American Empire. At least injuring the beast. It’s causing so much suffering around the world.Mr. Blum can be reached through his website 


Now we know that without a plausible strategy the boy who would be king has………homepage_targeted_assassinations_1







Continue reading

How Will History Judge Barack Hussein Obama?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.



In the end his sage adviser was fond of saying “What difference does it make?”



No matter who writes it, how many left or right wings they have, Obama must go down as a complete Marxist who attempted to destroy the U.S. Economy, eviscerate our military and turn America into a laughing-stock, and no longer a world-wide super power under his watch.

If members of congress who took the oath to uphold the Constitution had done so, the prince of darkness would have never darkened the door step at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

From a conspiracy theorists point of view could Obama have been put in place by puppet masters to sinister to imagine to allow Islam to take hold of the United States with the subversion of the U.S. to the word of Allah, which would be the worst of his involvements leading to another world war. 

If there is any merit to this thesis then there is going to be huge amounts of blood shed as this is the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic State. Historians may not record this for another 100-200 years, presupposing history will still be recorded in the U.S.

by Joe the Plummer

Seriously, When history takes a step back and reviews the time of President Barack Obama with an unbiased eye – they will say, “Damn Americans were really stupid back then!” (yes the majority of them mere)

Will historians lament; “How did it happen? It couldn’t be because he was black? Please tell me that Americans were smart enough to look at man/character instead of his skin color. Tell me that they didn’t vote this guy in because of this “white guilt” stuff I hear…” (yes they did and he got 95% of the black vote)obama_g_main


How can Americans vote a leader in to the highest, most honorable of positions based on skin color. Why didn’t they learn his history? Why didn’t they.. well, there’s been more than one leader voted in lawfully whose past should have had some giant red flags. (because they are ignorant and too dumb to vote)
Yes, way back in the year 2008, the education system in America was corrupt. They rewrote history with political agendas forced on the children from age four and carried all the way through to finish in college. BUT that is still not a good enough reason to vote:

( it should have been to vote the poser out of office not in)


Yes, the media was ridiculous. The news you received was slanted with whatever talking head was reporting it. News was made up for hits and ratings. They had an opinion and fed it to you. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:

Obama (so what is new from the sycophantic water boys and girls in the media, the very vast majority fly with two left wings)

Yes, Money was spent by big corporations through lobbyists in a revolving door with politicians going out one way and bribery going in the other. Tons of money from Wall Street to the Unions, with K Street buying politicians to make sure laws were made that favored them. The Unions raped their membership for dues in the pretense of working for them when in reality leadership made damn good money and lived the high life while the workers did the work. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:

Obama (Let’s not forget that Romney was an uninspiring candidate and that 4 million Republicans chose to sit the vote out)


4942824964_Obama20_20Hypocrisy2004_xlarge-2Yes Al Sharpton/Obama/Eric Holder worked hard to create more race warfare. They worked hard on telling black people that they are second class citizens. That they should get more help (control) from the government. That all white people are bad. BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote:Obama (no but it proves race hustling provides a lucrative income when you would otherwise be shining shoes)

Republicans were the most profligate spenders in the history of this nation between the years of 2000 – 2005 when they controlled all three branches of government. They grew deficits, debt, regulations and entertained the corrupt lobbyists like no one’s business – BUT that was still not a good enough reason to vote: (this is news that politicians are corrupt on both sides of the aisle?)


We were in a genuine crisis with bankers having raped the country and getting bailed out for their trouble. The housing and mortgage industry were being ruined and gutted.  (warned by President George W. Bush that this would happen and W. was ignored.)


Even though this one was half-white, we had never had a black President in this country and putting that dark part of history behind us, even a little was a prideful thought for Americans who are on the whole, just and benevolent people. (nope not buying it for a moment)

BUT that is still not a good enough reason to vote:


… Because now – everything above is worse by ten-fold. Barack Obama and his obama-debt-two-face-500x375presidency are like food poisoning: We just have to wait until it crawls through our system in a painful, bloated and sickening fashion that it does. (to which I agree or possibly like a malignancy with resultant chemotherapy)
Maybe the folks who say Barack Obama is the best thing that ever happened to us are right? That he represents the wake up call America needed to actually realize the 50-year bleed that liberals have been taking the country down? Perhaps it does have to get worse before it gets better? (the 50% are to dumb to get it.)

If 2010 and 2014 were any indications, we still have some sense in us and some urgency, hopefully. But let’s not forget what those Republicans did when they were in charge, okay? They set the table for Pelosi, Reid and eventually – two terms of Obama, executive orders, amnesty, ObamaCare and 5 trillion more dollars of debt and counting. (It’s not there money should they care?)

This is bad. BUT that is still not a good enough reason not to strap on your bayonets and get in the parade, as Freddie Rumson would say.  When history judges Barack Hussein Obama – we’ll be on the right side. (and as Hillary Clinton would say, what difference does it make?)

Who’s with me?




Continue reading

Phone Company ‘Outraged’ By Fraud, Abuse In ‘Obamaphone’ Program

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Yep, pulling out my pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, “I find The Right To Own Cell Phones paid for by others just in front of the place where it use to say under the 2nd Amendment, that “We the People had the right to bare arms. 




I think it’s time to pop open a cool one sit back and chill as I get into the wagon and let other people pull me around. I have paid far more than my fair share of taxes, thank you very much!

January 27, 2015

Brian Maass



What a free phone?  Just sign up right here!

DENVER (CBS4) – A nationwide cellphone company distributing phones and cellphone plans in Denver as part of a massive government program says it is “outraged by the unacceptable actions” uncovered by a CBS4 undercover investigation.

The response from Total Call Mobile comes nearly three months after an undercover CBS4 investigation revealed multiple examples of fraud and cheating in the phone distribution program.

The Lifeline program is aimed at providing free cellphone service to the poor and needy. It handed out more than 13 million free cellphone plans in the first six months of 2014. In Colorado, the program handed out more than 117,000 free cellphone plans in the first half of 2014 or about 20,000 cellphones every month.

If you own a cellphone, you pay for the free phones and their wireless plans via a monthly tax on your cellphone called the Universal Service Tax. Although the Lifeline wireless program has been around since 2005 and started under President George W. Bush, it ballooned under President Obama and the phones are often referred to as Obama phones.

To qualify for one of the cellphone plans, you have to be low-income — on food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance or some other government program.

Continue reading

What if ?

crew-2231By Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Obama can redeem himself !

When he is finally run from office, he can move back to Kenya and be buried with his bony ass sticking up out of the ground so little Kenyan children can use his remains for a bike rack.


What if?  What’s the past tense for it’s already happened?

Barack Obama’s game plan has just about been fully implemented.

Congress could have stopped him and didn’t, the sheriffs could have stopped him and didn’t, the same goes for the Supreme Court.

Barack Obama is the Kenyan personification of Evil, he hates our country and always will.

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: