Obama’s Month: He “Heard” America; Is It Listening to Him?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Of course Obama heard the message that America and American voters aren’t listening to him.  Does he care?  Not a bit.

He’s on a mission, to bring America to her knees economy while destroying our military capability and one of the most dangerous times in our countries history.

Real Clear Politics

By Alexis Simendinger – November 28, 2014

Barack Obama

Beijing sees Obama as a weak leader in the autumn of his final term

 Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


d3e4fee337ebfa2c640f6a706700589fObama will find he will have very little refuge anywhere he goes once he is finally booted out of the Oval Office.

Like the majority of Americans, our enemies and allies have no respect for the loser whose actions further destabilized a very dangerous world.

If he chooses to stay in the U.S. he will receive hoots and jeers from real Americans.

*Advice: Move back to Chicago or Kenya, (same thing), and he will likely do fine. 
With Obama’s lust for power he’d probably run for president of Kenya.
China is no refuge from Obama’s woes

Will a weakened Mr Obama have better luck with China? The answer is not necessarily “no”.

With the exception of North Korea, China’s neighbours are clamouring for a stronger US presence in the region. As the quip goes, Mr Xi talks like Deng Xiaoping – who opened China to the world – but acts like Mao Zedong, the imperial strongman.

Countries that were once wary of military ties with the US, such as Vietnam, India and the Philippines, are now openly courting it. Mr Obama’s pivot means 60 per cent of America’s military resources will be deployed in the Pacific – against the old 50:50 split with the Atlantic.

Second-term US presidents traditionally seek solace on the global stage. Barack Obama is no exception. Following last week’s drubbing in the US midterm elections, he lands in China on Monday for a summit with Xi Jinping. He is unlikely to find Beijing more pliable than Washington DC.

As time goes on, it becomes ever harder to separate his domestic weakness from his global standing. Even the tone is spreading. “US society has grown tired of [Obama’s] banality,” China’s semi-official Global Times said last week.Mr Xi is too polite to put it like that.

Yet there is no mistaking which of the two is on the way up. In his first year in office, Mr Obama offered Beijing a “G2” partnership to tackle the world’s big problems.

China spurned him. Mr Obama then unveiled his “pivot to Asia”. China saw it as US containment and reacted accordingly.

Its defense spending today is almost double in real terms what it was when Mr Obama first visited China in 2009.


Over the same period, the US military budget has barely kept pace with inflation.

Watch that change as Republican’s now controlling the Senate put forth legislation that Harry Reid refused to bring to the Senate for a vote.

Should Obama fail to sign said legislation, it will be just one more nail in his coffin and one of a thousand things to have helped destroy his legacy  as the worst, most corrupt “Leader,” in United States History.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Attacks Stay-at-Home Moms – “That’s Not a Choice we Want Americans to Make”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Does “The Fool,” actually believe that stay at home mom’s care what the government thinks?


Clearly in an off teleprompter moment, “The Chosen One,” went off the rails. This is a good thing, it’s the only time we know when he is telling the truth.

Indeed it “May take a village,” in the mind of Marxists like Hillary Clinton to raise children, but those of us for the most part that came from a well-functioning family with a stay at home mom seem to have done pretty well.

Can we say that now?

Who will pay for your delusions of Utopia? When you say we, you don’t mean you, you mean real “Taxpayers.”

Freedom Outpost

By 3 November 2014

President Obama was campaigning in Rhode Island when he began dissembling on the choice some women have to make between raising a family and earning to their full potential in their careers. He probably shouldn’t have gone off on this little rabbit trail, because by doing so he unmasked the wholesale contempt the Democrat Party holds for the average American woman.

Sometimes, someone, usually mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make.

The remarks come after Obama quickly backtracked earlier in the week when he implied that Michelle Obama doesn’t work. “I mean, I should point out, she is working really hard now as first lady and doesn’t get paid, but that’s a whole other thing. But — because I didn’t want her to think, like, what, I’m not working? Michelle works. I promise you.”

  1. Because really, how could a woman of any intelligence, fortitude and resolve have any desire to “JUST” be a homemaker? The Democrats hold a deep disdain for woman who would purposefully and actively choose to stay at home and care for their families. To the Democrat, your profession should be the most fulfilling thing about your life… not the family you’ve built with your mate.

    The Democrat motto for women of childbearing age is, “Let the kids be raised by the state, and go out there and earn some income for us to tax.”

    When you think about it, it is simply astounding the level of disapproval the average Democrat politician must have for conservative women.


    By the way – I don’t know how this fits in… but it kind of has to, doesn’t it? A recent study found that women with MORE children are MORE productive at work!

    A word of encouragement for my working moms: You are actually more productive than your childless peers.

    That’s the conclusion of a recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which found that over the course of a 30-year career, mothers outperformed women without children at almost every stage of the game. In fact, mothers with at least two kids were the most productive of all.

    Just the type of study a Federal Reserve Bank should be conducting, LMAO.

Obama Delivers Ebola to USA: Expediting Visas, Immigration Relief to Nationals of Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Puma is a black conservative woman with an outstanding site, please take a moment to visit here. She is among the best.


Big Shock: Obama is expediting visas to Ebola stricken countries in Africa.

Another failure to uphold his oath to protect the Constitution and the people of the United State


For weeks, Americans have been wondering why Barack Obama is refusing to impose a temporary ban on Ebola-afflicted nations.


Even before Barack Obama and his minions began holding daily press conferences attempting to tamp down what they refer to as hysteria over the Ebola outbreak here, Obama had begun expediting the visas of nationals in the USA from Ebola-stricken countries.

Pursuant to the website of Neufvillelaw.Com, in August, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began expediting visas.

Ebola Outbreak-related immigration relief measures to nationals of the West African nations of Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, who are currently in the United States.”

Since information regarding the Ebola virus has been disappearing from the internet, below is a screenshot of Neufvillelaw’s webpage.

Screenshot - 'Ebola Outbreak-related Immigration Relief Measures to Nationals of Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea Currently in the United States and other considerations I The La


As advertised by the Department of Homeland Security website, effective August 15, 2014:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is closely monitoring the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. USCIS offers relief measures to nationals of those three countries who are currently in the United States.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Signs Executive Order 13295 – Detention of Americans with “Respiratory Illnesses”

October 14, 2014
Christina Sarich

obama_executive_order_detainJuly of this year, President Obama signed into law an amendment to the Executive Order 13295, which redefines who can be quarantined andwhy.

This does not bode well for a nation that could potentially face an Ebola pandemic. It smacks of pre-meditated bio-warfare and martial law on a nation’s own citizens.

This means that any police officer or ‘health official’ can, without question, and on suspicion alone, quarantine someone simply for showing any sign of ‘respiratory illness.’

None other than the war-mongering Bush Administration, first put the order into place, originally meant to quarantine victims of SARS.

Ebola just happened to be listed on the original executive order, too, signed by Bush. But now, with the exception of influenza, Americans can be detained for any health concern, including Ebola, even if it is not named as such.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Praises Muslim Cleric Who Backed Fatwa on Killing of U.S. Soldiers

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Why wouldn’t Obama extol the virtues of a member of the Muslim Brotherhood?


He’s just keeping his word about “The winds of change,” and Islam.

We won’t be showing the video, the management decided as a safety precaution to keep those who might watch it from ending up with permanent keyboard imprints on their foreheads as they fell asleep and did a “Face plant.”


Controversial cleric gets nod in Obama’s speech at the United Nations
Barack Obama

 Barack Hussein Obama addresses the United Nations General Assembly / AP

September 24, 2014 1:40 pm

President Barack Obama favorably quoted and praised on Wednesday in his speech before the United Nations a controversial Muslim cleric whose organization has reportedly endorsed the terror group Hamas and supported a fatwa condoning the murder of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.


Obama in his remarks offered praise to controversial cleric Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah and referred to him as a moderate Muslim leader who can help combat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’s (ISIL or ISIS) radical ideology.

However, Bin Bayyah himself has long been engulfed in controversy for many of his views, including the reported backing of a 2004 fatwa that advocated violent resistance against Americans fighting in Iraq.

This is not the first time that the Obama administration has extolled Bin Bayyah, who also has served as the vice president of a Muslim scholars group founded by a radical Muslim Brotherhood leader who has called “for the death of Jews and Americans,” according to Fox News and other reports.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama: Sunni states should fight Islamic State because “that’s not what Islam is about”

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Can the reader believe this guy on anything?

Sunni’s and Shia have always had a different beliefs on the source of the meaning of “The Real Islam,”  Thus they have been in frequent skirmishes since Islam’s inception.


It was not until Obama’s blundering and dithering that U.S. tanks and other armaments were left in Syria and Iraq as he placed his bets once again on the insurgents hoping they would topple Assad while leaving the same to the Iraqi Army who immediately abandoned their uniforms and posts, leaving all equipment for use by the Islamic State. 

Come on Obama, you are a Muslim, cut the nonsense with your disinformation.


It’s bad enough that those capable of rational believe nothing you say or stand for but why give them the more reasons to support the fact that you are a fool?

                                                 Without his teleprompter he would be mute.

Jihad Watch

Sep 6, 2014 

If Sunni states do take up arms against the Islamic State, it will not be because “that’s not what Islam is about,” but because it is not in the interests of states like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey to acknowledge a caliph and give up their sovereignty, and because significant elements of the populations of Egypt and Turkey don’t want to live under Islamic law, such that the governments of both states (despite Turkey’s not-so-secret support for the nascent caliphate) may find it in their interests to take down the Islamic State.

“Obama outlines strategy to ‘ultimately destroy’ Islamic State,” by Kathleen Hennessey, Los Angeles Times, September 5, 2014

The United States and its allies aim to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the militant group Islamic State, President Obama said Friday as he began to outline a U.S. strategy focused on gathering partners from Sunni Arab states and aiding fighters on the region’s front lines.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama says it was not his decision to withdraw troops from Iraq

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Yep, for sure and if only pigs could fly!



Suzanne Hamner does a masterful job in not just casting Obama as a pathological liar, a sociopathic  personality type who also lies and a psychopath.


 originalShe also delves into mythomania or psuedological fanstastica which means he lies and then makes more lies to cover the lies which he even believes.



It’s a fair diagnosis to be given to Hillary Clinton as well.

Jihad Watch

Aug 10, 2014 


Note how he says that if we still had troops on the ground in Iraq, they would increase his headaches, as they’d have to be reinforced. He doesn’t consider the possibility that if he had not left Iraq so precipitously and then boasted about doing so, the Islamic State might not exist today. This is not to say that the Iraq misadventure was any better conceived or better executed than the one in Afghanistan. It would never have been possible to establish a stable secular republic there. But there is no doubt that Obama’s weakness gave the jihadis an opportunity, and he took it. “Obama calls reporter’s question ‘BOGUS and WRONG,’ but his own words prove otherwise,” The Right Scoop, August 9, 2014:

In order to reassure the American people that he’s a NOT complete dithering fool, Obama held a press conference earlier today before going on vacation (again). The very last question he took got him in a  little huff and he rambled on and on about it until he finally called it an analysis that is “bogus and wrong.”…

This was the question: “Do you have any second thoughts about pulling all ground troops out of Iraq? Does it give you pause doing the same thing in Afghanistan?”

He tries to slither out of responsibility by blaming Iraq for not wanting U.S. troops there, conveniently neglecting that getting troops out of Iraq was one of his greatest campaign promises. As many on Twitter noted:


He specifically claimed that he kept that promise and now he’s saying it wasn’t his fault. So which is it?

The answer is – whichever is politically convenient at the time.


Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: