In the interviews that are included with this video, Newt not only shreds Reid and Pelosi but explains why they believe lying is legitimate if one is a democrat.
In the second video he reveals that for the first time in history Richard Trumka’s Union, the AFL/CIO is not endorsing a candidate. A direct reflection of the memberships distrust of Obama. Classic and vintage Newt!
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and i approve this message
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich accused House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of demonstrating a “level of hypocrisy” that the GOP “can’t match” with their attempts to paint the Republicans as the political party of the rich.
TheDC asked Gingrich how he responds when he hears Democratic leaders like Reid and Pelosi say the Republicans only care about the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.
“First of all, this is a politics that goes all the way back to William Jennings Bryan. It is in the genetic code of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. They say it every four years and have forever. It is ironic when a Nancy Pelosi who is a multimillionaire says it. It’s a little bit like John Kerry saying it,” Gingrich told The Daily Caller in a video interview. Complete article below.
Winston Churchill Believed That “Nothing in history was ever settled except by wars,”
Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill never met, and who knows how it might have changed the course of history in the 20th century if the Nazi had made a different decision in the spring of 1932.
He was already standing in the lobby of the Grand Hotel Continental in Max Joseph Strasse in Munich, unshaven, exhausted from his election campaign, wearing a shabby trench coat. In another room, Churchill was dining with his family and members of his entourage, waiting for Hitler.
The short, stout Briton, the scion of one of England’s most important families, was already famous. He was a successful journalist and author of bestsellers, and before World War I he had already served as home secretary, president of the board of trade and first lord of the admiralty (head of the navy). During World War I, he was appointed minister of munitions, then secretary of state for war and secretary of state for air. After the war, he became secretary of state for the colonies and, finally, served as chancellor of the Exchequer from 1924 to 1929. The British Isles had not seen someone with such an illustrious career in a long time.
Hitler Showed Little Interest Complete article below
Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist
The claim that Romney helped create more than 100,000 jobs is difficult to prove. The campaign has said the figure comes from current statistics on three companies that Romney helped start or expand — Staples (89,000 jobs), Sports Authority (15,000 jobs) and Domino’s (7,900 jobs). However, the companies themselves, as opposed to Romney and Bain, may be responsible for the actual job creation since Bain’s initial investment.
For the sake of argument let’s cut the number in half. Obama has created no new net jobs with the exception of growing the government.
“It makes me angry. Those guys were all rich. They all had more money than they would ever spend, yet they did not have money to take care of the very people who made the money for them.”
— Former steel worker Joe Soptic, in a new Obama campaign ad on Mitt Romney’s business record
Anyone who watches the pro-Obama videos of the workers who suffered can’t help but be moved.
But Romney and his supporters point to the other side of the story – the many successful companies that Bain Capital helped get off the ground.
Tens of thousands of people are now employed by those companies, including Sports Authority, Staples, Domino’s Pizza and Bright Horizons, a child care company.
His frequently quoted number of creating 100,000 in new jobs has not been substantiated. (More below)
Commentary by Jim Campbell
Please visit my buddy’s site at RealClearPolitics
A DAM big point was missed here by all: The land in question belongs to the progeny of Karl Marx, doubtless the two beavers were direct descendents.
So please get this straight: Marxist notions of collectivization and redistribution of the property of the bourgeois puts it on a collision course with the economic philosophy of Capitalism and free markets, and also with the social-governmental philosophies related to Democracy, in the oldest, pre-Marxism sense of that word. Ergo, lawyer speak nothing is ours!
This is a true story and one that will bust you up after you are done shaking your head. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.
The following is true.
This is an actual letter sent to a man named Ryan DeVries regarding a pond on his property. It was sent by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Quality, State of Pennsylvania . This guy’s response is hilarious, but read The State’s letter before you get to the response letter.
File No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec 20; Lycoming County
Dear Mr. DeVries:
It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity:
Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.
A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity.. A review of the Department’s files shows that no permits have been issued Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Pennsylvania Compiled Laws, annotated.
You will not have many opportunities to hear and sing a song at the same time that is so profound. It’s still playing in my head colliding with my still three functioning neurons.
Thank You Lenin and the Castro’s for making my day.
Random thoughts while observing the passing parade, I’m J.C.
by Jim Campbell
When President Harry Truman was told by the Supreme Court of the United States of America that his attempts to seize the coal and steel industries were Unconstitutional, why is Barack Hussein Obama being held to a different standard?
Does he believe he is above the law? Is he betting that the current leadership, under Nancy Pelosi would never begin Impeachment Proceedings? What will Republicans do when they eventually gain control of both houses?
On the issue, does he believe he’s above the law? The answer goes without saying as was recently demonstrated during the vote on the health care fiasco. Also his take over of Banks. the Auto Industry, and seventeen percent of the GDP by nationalizing our health care industry would certainly qualify. Is he safe with his bet on Nancy Pelosi, seemingly so.
What will Republicans do when they once again gain control of both houses or make substantial gains in November? It would be most prudent to make President Obama a lame duck, making no more legislation possible during the next two years.
The country would not be well served with another Impeachment when there is so much very important legislation to be implemented, cutting taxes, and useless programs, while putting our country back on the road toward real growth in the private sector.
Random thoughts while observing the passing charade, I’m J.C.
On June 2, 1952, in a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court declared in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer that the president lacked the authority to seize the steel mills. Writing for a badly divided majority, Justice Hugo Black held that the president had no authority under the Constitution to seize private property on the grounds of national security. Since the Congress had not otherwise authorized the president to seize the steel mills, the president could not do so.
When President Truman attempted to deal with striking coal workers, in United States v. Pewee Coal Co. 341 U.S. 114 (1951) as justification for the government’s claims of unfettered executive power. Judge Pine issued his opinion at 4:45 p.m. on April 29. “There is no express grant of power in the Constitution authorizing the President to direct this seizure. There is no grant of power from which it reasonably can be implied. There is no enactment of Congress authorizing it,” the court declared. H/T dragon1