Tag Archives: hillary clinton

Big Media Blacks Out the Clinton Foundation Foreign-Money Story Even Though It’s A Crime

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Seriously, if foreign countries and entities want Hillary Clinton to be the next U.S. President shouldn’t that be the final nail in the coffin of the chronic liar and serial perjurer?  Hillary is bringing an entire new meaning to the phrase, “Know your Enemies.”

It makes perfect sense when one considers the knowledge level of those voting in United States Elections.



Trie-Chung-HuangRemember,  Johnny Chung: contributor and colleague; many visits to Clinton White House and Oval Office with mainland Chinese associates; several illegal campaign contributions, money laundering, tax fraud, and bank fraud guilty pleas (“Democrat Fund-Raiser Pleads Guilty” March 17, 1998).

Chung, has told federal investigators that the chief of China’s military intelligence funneled $300,000 through him to back President Clinton’s 1996 campaign



Among the many, many reasons why Americans hate and distrust the mainstream media, we’ve got the amazing spectacle of a major story directly impacting a likely presidential candidate — Hillary Clinton — completely blacked out in favor of obsessive coverage for llamas on the loose.

To mix animal metaphors, many liberal-media critics smell a rat every time the airwaves are filled with obsession over a frivolous story.  NewsBusters clocked six minutes on the story of llamas running loose in Arizona, but only 32 seconds of coverage on one of the major networks (CBS) for the incredible tale of Hillary Clinton’s foundation raking in foreign and corporate cash both during and after her tenure as Secretary of State.


This is the same media that squeezed a solid week of shrieking, hysterical news coverage out of Rudy Giuliani, who isn’t even running for anything, expressing doubts about the depth of Barack Obama’s love for America.  Even the casual news consumer realized the intensity of this coverage had little to do with its news-worthiness.  

It was, in part, a cynical attempt to use Giuliani’s remarks as a hydraulic piston to hammer the Republicans who probably are running for president, beginning with — but by no means limited to — Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, but mostly it was a sustained wail of anguish and outrage from media elites, who identify so strongly with their beloved Barack Obama that they took Giuliani’s s remarks as a personal slight against them.

There’s no question about the depth of Hillary Clinton’s love for money.  As the Clinton Foundation story gets deeper, it’s increasingly difficult for the mainstream press to justify ignoring it.  They’ll be even more reluctant to ask her about it, the way hordes of them followed Walker around and interrogated him about what he thinks Barack Obama is thinking.  Hillary Clinton doesn’t get asked about anything.

The media allows her to remain invisible for as long as she likes, and since her public appearances tend to become gaffe avalanches, she stays invisible quite a bit.  It would be a certain sign that the media favoritism her nascent candidacy depends on was evaporating if they actually asked her about the Clinton Foundation stories.

The story we’ve been hearing so little about from the press came in two stages.  First, the Wall Street Journal dished on the Clinton Foundation quietly dropping its “self-imposed ban on collecting funds from foreign governments” and collecting a rapidly increasing amount of foreign money.  Second, the Washington Post discovered that “self-imposed ban” wasn’t exactly imposed with rigorous discipline to begin with:

The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.

Most of the contributions were possible because of exceptions written into the foundation’s 2008 agreement, which included limits on foreign-government donations.

The agreement, reached before Clinton’s nomination amid concerns that countries could use foundation donations to gain favor with a Clinton-led State Department, allowed governments that had previously donated money to continue making contributions at similar levels.

The new disclosures, provided in response to questions from The Washington Post, make clear that the 2008 agreement did not prohibit foreign countries with interests before the U.S. government from giving money to the charity closely linked to the secretary of state.

In one instance, foundation officials acknowledged they should have sought approval in 2010 from the State Department ethics office, as required by the agreement for new government donors, before accepting a $500,000 donation from the Algerian government.

The money was given to assist with earthquake relief in Haiti, the foundation said. At the time, Algeria, which has sought a closer relationship with Washington, was spending heavily to lobby the State Department on human rights issues.

See entire fiasco below.

Continue reading

Hillary’s Straw Man Argument Against Second Amendment Backfires

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


In a beautifully written by Kevin Campbell back in 2014 the writer demonstrated that Hillary is not only obtuse but completely dense on the issue of the 2nd Amendment.


Hillary is a fierce advocate of the so-called U.N Gun Ban Treaty, which will legally never come to pass as long as we are a Constitutionally driven Republic.

Please see from PBS ” Hillary Clinton: ‘You have to be a little bit crazy to run for president,’ her single qualification with the exception that she’s not just a little bit crazy, she’s over the cliff crazy, and that is exactly where she would take our country in finishing Obama’s job!

She like Obama, Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer and many others of their Marxist ilk believe they know what is best for America. 

Do we really need another lying Marxist in the White House?  I think not.




There is no petition  to sign, as Hillary’s Baby will never legally come to fruition.

The United States Constitution art. 2, § 2 dictates that treaties are international agreements that have received the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate and have been ratified by the President. There are two types of treaties. Bilateral treaties are agreements made by two countries. Multilateral treaties are agreements made by three or more countries. As chief executive of the United States, the President has the authority to create international agreements with other nations without Senate approval. These international agreements are called executive agreements.

Treaty-Making Process

Treaties are initiated at the executive level of government usually by the President or the Secretary of State. A representative for the United States is sent to negotiate the terms of the treaty with the representatives of other countries. When the parties agree on the terms, the representative submits the terms to the Secretary of State for approval. If the terms are accepted by the Secretary of State, then the representative will sign the treaty. The Secretary of State submits the treaty to the President for transmittal to the Senate.

Once the President receives the treaty, it is submitted to the Senate for approval. In the Senate, it is referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for consideration. The committee considers the terms of the treaty and, upon approval, submits the treaty to the entire Senate for consideration. The Senate must approve the treaty with a 2/3 majority vote.


The President ratifies the treaty and proclaims its entry into force.

147_Hillary’s Straw Man Argument Against Second Amendment Backfires


By Kevin Campbell
Published May 19th, 2014

One of the most vocal opponents of the second amendment has always been Hillary Clinton. As recently as this past week, a straw man argument that she has been making on the subjects of gun control, increased gun regulation and reigning in the second amendment rights of citizens has backfired – miserably.
For those unfamiliar with the term, a straw man is a common type of argument that someone brings out to intentionally misrepresent the original topic of the argument. If two people are arguing and one person is losing dramatically, they may attempt to subtly change what the argument was about in the first place.

The logic is that, if the person can’t win the argument on his or her own merits while discussing the original topic, perhaps they would have better luck by changing the topic being talked about altogether. It’s a common tactic among the anonymous people who argue about politics and pop culture on the Internet. That’s exactly what Hillary Clinton has been using when discussing the pressing need for increased gun regulations, though she hasn’t been having nearly the luck that people online do.
In a statement that was made in National Harbor, Maryland on May 6, Hillary Clinton indicated that we as a country needed to adopt tighter gun restrictions in an attempt to stave off economic inequality that is contributing greatly to social collapse. By shifting the argument away from the merits of gun control and towards the situation with the economy, she has essentially conceded the point and given her detractors all of the ammunition they need to beat her in future discussions and debates. Whether or not she realizes that she’s done that is a subject that is up for debate.
It has long been expected that Hillary Clinton will seek the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2016 and run for President of the United States. She would become the first female President in the country’s history. Her chief opponent in that election was always projected to be New Jersey’s governor Chris Christie, though that has recently changed after his administration has been rocked by scandal after scandal.

When discussing gun control, Hillary Clinton curiously stated that it was possible for a person to both argue that we as a country need to adopt significantly stricter gun control laws and to support the second amendment and gun ownership in general at the same time. She indicated that she was simply warning that unrestricted access to firearms of all types could have dangerous consequences for the population as a whole, as seen in recent firearm-related tragedies like the movie theater shooting at an opening day showing of “The Dark Knight Rises” and the school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary. Her critics have argued that by demanding increased gun control, the only thing she is really doing is proving that she doesn’t understand the second amendment at all.

Continue reading

Obama’s Third Term? Why It’s So Hard For Hillary Clinton To Shake That Charge





Vice President Joe Biden spoke in Iowa on Thursday saying exactly what you’d expect him to say about the success of the Obama administration and how it should be carried on: “Those seeking to lead the nation should protect and defend and run, yes run, on what we’ve done; own what we have done.



Stand for what we have done, acknowledge what we have done, and be judged on what we have done. … Some say that would amount to a third term of the president. I call it sticking with what works and what we oughta do.”

A third Obama term. The vice president isn’t the only one who feels this way. This, of course, is what Republicans have been saying Hillary Clinton’s presidency would be for months. Biden didn’t introduce this idea, but it’s one thing for Republicans to say it, it’s another thing for the vice president to bolt it onto the eventual Democratic nominee.



When I heard it, I was fresh from having read David Axelrod’s book Believer about his life in politics from his first political rally at age 5 to the celebration of Obama’s re-election in Chicago on election night in 2012. In the book, he recounts the details of the 2008 campaign, when Obama repeatedly said he didn’t want to give “John McCain the chance to serve out George Bush’s third term.”

This is a standard attack. Indeed, Democrats are raising money today playing on the idea that Jeb Bush is a third George W. Bush term. The big obvious difference in 2016 is that Obama is much more popular right now than George Bush was at the end of his presidency.

Bush’s approval rating was 28 percent in the 2008 election night exit poll. Right now Barack Obama’s approval rating is 47 percent in the Gallup poll, almost 20 points higher. If the economy continues to improve, that number could climb higher still and you could imagine Hillary Clinton saying, If by third term you mean another 59 months of continuous job growth and falling unemployment, then yes I’ll be a third term.

UPDATE: Why is Hillary Clinton a Known Liar still surviving while Brian Williams may not?

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


Hillary Clinton is a recidivist perjurer, not just with her stone walling the congressional oversight committee on Benghazi but her lies go as far back to the “Suicide of Vince Foster.”  He was murdered!  Who knows what lies she ginned up while first lady to the governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton also cut from the same cloth?




Perhaps our righteous indignation is phony.  When was the last time you told a little white lie? Not a black lie, because that would be racist.

Sharyl Attkisson: Why Did Hillary Survive a Brian Williams-like Tale?

****NBC will resolve Brian Williams controversy ‘today or tomorrow’****

News Max and The Weekly Standard

(Kavin Lamarque/Reuters/Landov)

Feb, 10, 2015

Emmy Award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson, who covered the story of Hillary Clinton’s lie about being shot at in Bosnia, says she can’t understand how the former secretary of state weathered the scandal while NBC News anchor Brian Williams may not. “To me, part of the irony is if Brian Williams isn’t able to survive it — that we think it’s important enough when somebody gives this kind of story that he would lose his career — yet we didn’t care enough to have it matter that much with someone who became our secretary of state,” Attkisson said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show” on Newsmax TV.
“[A person] we relied on for honest answers and truths in the aftermath of Benghazi and so on.” Last Wednesday, Williams, one of NBC’s biggest stars, recanted his longtime claim of being aboard a helicopter forced down by a rocket-propelled grenade during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Crew members on the 159th Aviation Regiment’s Chinook hit by two rockets and small arms fire told Stars and Stripes that Williams was nowhere near that aircraft — but on another aircraft that took no fire.

Williams, who apologized on his nightly newscast, told Stars and Stripes: “I don’t know what screwed up in my mind that caused me to conflate one aircraft with another.”

“Is it really more important that Brian Williams has a certain type of character and honesty than a presidential candidate or secretary of state?” said Attkisson, a former CBS News reporter.

“I don’t know, that’s up to the American people to decide, but clearly they got past it in the case of Hillary Clinton, although it was never explained. We’ll see if people can get past it in the case of Brian Williams.”

Clinton’s gaff came during her 2008 run for the White House, when she claimed she and her staff had dodged sniper fire on an airport landing strip in Bosnia. But news video of the event revealed it never happened.

Attkisson, author of “Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington,” published by Harper, said Williams’ lie was on that trip with Clinton and that the Williams case is “strangely” reminiscent.

“In both cases, the attempt at a mea culpa initially kind of almost made things worse,” she said.

“With Hillary Clinton, after the video was found that there was no sniper fire, there was no apparent danger on the runway as she claims, she doubled down and said, ‘Well, I stopped and you saw pictures of me greeting the young girl, because how could I walk past her and break her little heart? But after that I ran to the car.

“So I was assigned to do a second day story by [the CBS] Evening News … that showed more video that too wasn’t true, and when she knew we had the video it is just beyond me that she continued to tell this tale.”

Attkisson said the video showed that Clinton “lingered on the runway, took pictures with a group of seventh graders, visited with the troops, [and] took photographs with them.

“There was no apparent danger to us, there was no mention of it, there was no corkscrew landing, there was no sniper fire,” she said.

“You kind of wonder in both instances … how they got away for so long with telling the story and how they thought that they would get away with it without somebody coming to them, family members and so on, saying that didn’t happen.”

Williams, who has temporarily taken himself off the air, is now under an internal investigation at NBC. His fate may weigh on other things besides just journalistic integrity, according to Attkisson.

“There is a pending sale [involving NBC] that could come into play in terms of the value of the company, the reputation of the company and its marketability more than anything else may come into play,” she said.


Continue reading

Rand Paul in Dallas: Hillary Clinton ‘Yesterday’s News’

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Perhaps not the best thing Senator Paul could have said about Hillary, but no where near the worst.



I agree with him completely, Hillary is yesterday’s news until she finally get’s the nomination of the Democratic Party.   



Hold down CMD and + to enlarge quotes that keep changing.

UPDATE: Hillary Group Partnered With Company That Laundered $250 Billion For Iran And Violated Sanctions

Then let the games begin.  Clinton will be subjected to the biggest anal probe in United States History over her lies on Benghazi and her complete inability to tell the truth.

Like Obama, Hillary Clinton is afflicted with mythomania or psuedological fanstastica which means they lie and then makes more lies to cover the lies which they even believes.

Do we need another pathological liar in the White House and a psychopath as well?

Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government

DALLAS, Texas — Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton—a former U.S. Senator from New York, the former First Lady of the United States, and the Democrats’ likely frontrunner and nominee in 2016—is “yesterday’s news.”

Breitbart News asked Paul—flanked by the new addition to his campaign team, Texas GOP chairman Steve Munisteri—for his thoughts on Mitt Romney bowing out of the 2016 GOP presidential contest at the Friday evening press conference held at the Renaissance Hotel.

“I supported and campaigned for him when he won the nomination in the fall,” Paul said of Romney. “I think he’s a great man personally, a great businessman, I think he would have run this country a lot better than this president.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Hillary Trapped By Iran Sanctions Issue

crew-2231By Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Below: The “Perjuring Butcher of Benghazi.”


Nothing more needs to be said, Dick Morris says it all in the video above.

That being said, remember cockroaches survived the Atom bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

I’d put nothing past this female vermin, though I doubt she will run.

She will likely pull a Romney and bail.

Continue reading

Reporter Sharyl Atkisson says White House is Hiding Pictures from Night of Benghazi Attack

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Doubtless most of our readers have seen the obviously Photo Shopped image of Barack Obama in the situation room during the alleged raid by SEAL TEAM VI.


Proof of the image being Photo Shopped you ask? How about common sense?
Why is Obama with his amazing uncalled for ego shown with the smallest head in the room?
As alleged P.O.T.U.S. why is he at the back of the room, did someone hastily wake him up when he should have been on duty?
As for the additional photos, I’m guessing they won’t be forthcoming, but even if they are, they will more than likely be as fake as the birth certificate on the White House website.

Tim Brown

Eagle Rising

In an interview on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” Tuesday morning, former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson revealed that photos taken by the White House photographer taken the night of the Benghazi attacks have never been turned over.

When asked about questions she wanted to see answered by the Benghazi special committee, she said that she had a new list of questions which she intends on publishing. However, she says that the conflict regarding what Obama did that night still remains and the photos might just give.

“One of the things my producer and I did early on to try to get clues, because you know they told us so little initially, we requested White House photos taken that night,” she explained. “Because if you know how the White House works, a photographer is omnipresent. He would have been there taking photographs in the Situation Room. He would have been taking photographs of the president that night. So we asked for the photos, which in my view, are public information. They are paid for with tax dollars, and they release them when they want them released and they are positive.”

Attkisson said that she had requested the photos. However, though she was told by the White House photo office that she would receive the photos by the end of the day, she was then referred to Josh Earnest, who was deputy press secretary at the time, who refused to respond to both her and her producers’ phone calls and emails.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Stand with Hillary: Part 2 Arkansas

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Hillary Clinton has been called every name in the book on this site by the editor and its viewers.


For the sake of brevity, we will in the future refer to her as “Skank.”

Top Ten Reasons Hillary Clinton Should not become President of the U.S.

Once one breaks through all the partisan DNC news media propaganda and adoring Hollywood worship continuously shielding the Clinton’s from any and all actual scrutiny to examine the facts and evidence for themselves, it becomes unmistakably clear that Hillary Clinton is a corrupt and ruthless career-criminal without boundaries, who personally destroys anyone who gets in her way…often while somehow managing to play the victim. She could not be more unfit for public office.


Here are the top ten reasons she should not even be considered for president in 2016:

10) The left’s trademark of ploy of silencing all dissent with red herring diversionary smears like “you’re racist” has already taken its Hillary-era form, with liberals frivolously condemning gender-irrelevant controversies as “sexist.”

9) She has accomplished absolutely nothing.

8) In the 1990s, she helped mastermind a fraudulent land deal with Clinton crony James McDougal, who owned the extremely shady bank used in the scam, which was illegally used to pay off Clinton campaign debts…and witnesses in this scandal (Whitewater) were openly intimidated, silenced, and had their careers brutally destroyed when they remained in the way.

7) She illegally seized hundreds of FBI files, suppressed countless incriminating emails, and leaked Privacy Act-protected information to silence and smear Democrat activists sexually harassed by her husband (see here).

6) She blatantly lied under oath to deny inventing bogus criminal charges against seven White House employees to get them out-of-the-way (to replace them with Clinton friends and cronies). From the LA Times: “There is ‘substantial evidence’ that First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton lied under oath in denying that she played a role in the 1993 White House travel office firings, independent counsel Robert W. Ray reported Thursday.” That would be the same Robert Ray that the bought-and-paid-for Clinton propagandists at Media Matters lyingly misrepresented as having exonerated her.

5) She was caught completely fabricating a story out of thin air about coming under fire in Bosnia, which she was later forced to admit to lying about.

4) She was fired from the “Watergate” investigation by life-long Democrat Jerry Zeifman for being “an unethical, dishonest lawyer” who “conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the Committee and the rules of confidentiality,” as he put it.

3) She took bribes from communist China in the form of illegal campaign contributions, in exchange for influential seats on Commerce Department trade missions.

2) She incompetently enabled a preventable terrorist attack in Benghazi and then silenced witnesses, staged phony “investigations,” and lied through her teeth to cover it up…deliberately and repeatedly misrepresenting it as a “spontaneous demonstration” sparked by Americans having the right to disagree with Islam in public–a position so blatantly dishonest that card-carrying Democrat whistle-blower Gregory Hicks testified: “I’ve never been as embarrassed in my life, in my career, as on that day,” when the Obama administration began blatantly misinforming the public about why this happened.

1) She is an open and enthusiastic enemy of the Constitution on virtually every issue (i.e., she’s a liberal).

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: