How many times will Obama be allowed to blow it before congress does the right thing.


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, Patriot and Infidel.

 

Obama must be impeached by both houses of congress. For nay-sayers, the process is in the U.S. Constitution, failure to do so makes them equally culpable.

 

The seal of the presidency of the United States superimposed under an image of the Qur’an would be an excellent memorial stone for the current occupant of the White House.

 

2009-06-20-obama-war

 

As the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi put it this way:

Obama “switched sides in the War on Terror.” The evidence presented above is but a glimpse into the preponderance of open source, published information that supports the Commission’s conclusion.

obama

We are now faced with a totally new geopolitical situation: geographically, politically, and militarily.

With the body count growing by the day, and with a far larger war looming on the horizon, one would think that the responsible parties still left in government would pause, reflect, and begin to reverse course before it is too late.

This will never happen with Obama at the helm.

 

Trevor Loudon : New Zeal

March 12, 2015
Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood created and backed the Arab Spring, and are responsible for the rise of genocidal ISIS.mbcontrol

Part I of The Betrayal Papers explained the history and context of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence in the American government.

Part II looked at the associations of seven Obama officials with Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in the United States.

Part III traced the Muslim Brotherhood’s and the State of Qatar’s influence on domestic policy and Obama administration scandals.

Part IV will examine foreign policy under Obama. It will explain how the Obama administration and U.S. Department of State have used the American military and standing in the world as tools to kick-start the creation of a new Islamic Caliphate. Obama’s unconscionable enabling of and silence regarding a new genocide will be revealed. Finally, this article will offer a cursory reassessment of America’s allies, and which countries we have lost as friends.

“The transformation of America has been in the full swing ever since 2008. President Obama’s no-show in Paris was an embarrassment for all Americans. But it also was a signal to the Islamic jihadis. It’s one of the many signals he’s sent over the years while he’s in office. Now there’s no question: We got a hell of a job ahead of us… with the Muslim Brotherhood penetration in every one of our national security agencies, including all our intelligence agencies.“

Is Obama a Muslim?

This is the question that many Americans and people around the globe are asking themselves lately. From his refusal to label the Islamic State “Islamic,” to his lecture about the Crusades at the National Prayer breakfast, what once was taboo is now starting to be verbalized.

Yet this may be the slightly wrong question to ask. The ruling establishment of Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest sites, Mecca and Medina, is rightly considered an authoritative voice of Islam. In case you missed it, the Saudis have emerged as some of Obama’s biggest critics.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Netanyahu Delivered Just What Obama Feared


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

 

Obama talks continuously about having the most transparent administration in history yet all he does is keep us completely in the dark.

When Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjaman Netanyahu tells us Iran will not have nukes, who are you going to believe?

 

OBAMA-transparency-

 

 

He has the respect of no one, enemies or allies alike, even his wife hated him.

So leave it to good ole Be Be to clean of the decks and straighten the deck chairs as he added much needed veritas to the moment at hand.

 
Israel’s prime minister delivered a sober reminder of the risks of dealing with Iran—and painted Obama as naïve in the process.

The National Journal
By James Oliphant

March 3, 2015

 

-1

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks about Iran during a joint meeting of Congress in the House chamber at the U.S. Capitol. At the risk of further straining the relationship between Israel and the Obama administration, Netanyahu warned members of Congress against what he considers an ill-advised nuclear deal with Iran.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)

March 3, 2015 Congressional Republicans haven’t had many victories in their lasting conflict with President Obama, but Tuesday brought one. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s somber, provocative speech to Congress checked all the boxes.

It called into question the efficacy of any deal the Obama administration might strike with Iran over its nuclear program, it likely renewed momentum for another round of Iranian sanctions on the Hill, it positioned the GOP politically as the party more worried about Israeli security, and, despite the White House’s best efforts, made the president appear petty and churlish.

Obama, in an interview with Reuters, had dismissed the speech as a “distraction,” and aides made sure everyone knew he would be too busy to watch it. But if the president didn’t cast an eye at a TV, he might have been the only person in Washington not to. And that’s the problem.

For weeks, the White House has worked steadily to write the speech off as a thinly veiled Republican ploy to undermine the delicate negotiations with Iran. But network coverage treated it for what it was: the head of state of a critical ally delivering a controversial address on American soil. That served the interests of both House Speaker John Boehner, who was the impetus behind the speech, and Netanyahu, elevating both of them while key Democrats such as Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren stayed offstage.

Netanyahu was hailed in the House chamber like a conquering hero. The moment felt, well, presidential. He smartly rose to the occasion by taking time to thank Obama’s various and sometimes underpublicized efforts on Israel’s behalf. “I will always be grateful to President Obama for that support,” he said.

Then, to little surprise, he quickly reminded Congress and the public at large of Iranian threats to annihilate Israel and kill its citizens. But beyond that, he painted a picture of a global, existential struggle against religious extremism using the kind of loaded language that Obama won’t touch. He said Iran is a regime “hijacked by religious zealots” who are on an ideological mission to wage “jihad.”

Entire article below.

Continue reading

ISIS-Flag Waving Man Shouts Propaganda at a College-No One Cares-Then He Pulls Out Another Flag…


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

us_israel_flags2

Though this was a ploy by a woods be actor to get a reaction it just goes to show the ignorance of the student body.

Where is one good Marine when he is needed. 

 

marine-corps-logo

We don’t expect those that attend Berkly to wave an American flag, that would be unthinkable.

If Berkly is to provide the country with the best and brightest, God help us if the go into politics, they are already to immersed in Marxist politically correct speech and thinking.

Can there be any wonder why Israel’s Prime Minister has told Obama he would go it alone against Iran or Isis?

He understands Obama is a wimp.

IJR

By Nicholas Kurch

The University of California, Berkeley is regarded by some as an institution where the best and brightest go to receive their college education. An institution that has endeavored to teach the future of the U.S. For some, that might be a concerning prospect.

A video produced by Ami Horowitz shows him waving an ISIS flag at a campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Many of the students walked past, unconcerned or without any sense of outrage, as he waved the flag of an organization that has already viciously murdered three American citizens and is spreading through the region on a campaign of mass slaughter and torture.

Then, after Horowitz pulls an Israeli flag out, that’s when it starts to get concerning. As the Israeli flag is being waved, many of the students passing by take time to express their rage towards Israel. Many of the students throw out slurs and obscene gestures. Those who have something to say called the Israeli government mass murderers.

That anyone would object to a nation that defends itself is not only confusing but disturbing. What is more disturbing is that no one on that campus had anything much to say in regards to ISIS. As it turns out, most Berkeley students seem to find the tiny state of Israel more offensive than ISIS.

 

(WATCH) Greta Van Susteren Has the PERFECT Response to Obama Whitehouse’s “Chickens**t” Remark


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Greta is clearly of the notion that Obama should apologize to Netanyahu for calling him “Chicken shit.”

world_leaders_at_age_23Bibi, Putin and the chump

Seriously, Bibi knows from Obama’s actions personally toward him that nothing he would say could ever be believed.

th

Can you give me a big A for Allah?  An M. for Mohammed?  What’s that spell?

Obama is a loser and and doesn’t have the strength to pick up Netanyahu’s jock up from the floor.

Netanyahu has Israel’s interest at heart, it’s also clear where  Obama’s loyalties lie.

The Political Insider

Outrage continues to spread as it was reported a senior White House official referred to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as “chicken s**t.” That country has always been a close ally, and Netanyahu is determined to defeat the terrorists, which doesn’t sit well with Obama. The Atlantic was the first to break the story:

The other day I was talking to a senior Obama administration official about the foreign leader who seems to frustrate the White House and the State Department the most. “The thing about Bibi is, he’s a chicken shit,” this official said, referring to the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, by his nickname.

That is why Gov. Rick Perry of Texas and other supporters of Israel has called on that anonymous official to resign:

I’m hopeful the President of the United States shares the complete and total disbelief many of us felt that a senior official working in the West Wing of the White House would use profanity to describe the leader of our greatest ally in the Middle East.

The President should demand to know who said this and ask for their resignation as there is absolutely no excuse for such language coming out of the White House.

If the President receives no answer as to who said this he should consider making wholesale changes to his staff in order to guard our vital interests and for the sake of maintaining an important relationship with a key ally.

Joining in with critics, Fox News Greta Van Susteren strongly suggested Obama apologize for the remark. Watch (above) as she calls Obama out for not handling the situation well, which is a larger reflection on his failed foreign policy.

#####

Continue reading

A History Lesson: Why we fight in the Middle East and the formation of the Islamic State


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It all relates to the Sykes-Picot Agreement which was imposed upon “The Arab State.”

Glenn-Beck-from-Tom-Degans-Rant

To be sure, Glenn Beck has his detractors.

I’ve found him to be one of the most influential people and educators who awakened me to what has been going on in America as the progressive, communist movement has tried to grasp her and pull her beneath the the surface.

e69b05ae5c6c21180b223adf8693a88b

This should serve as a wake up call, much the same as his introduction to us of who the creature called Barack Hussein Obama seems to be and where he got his intellectual roots.

200px-Rules_for_Radicals

Cloward and Piven, Saul Alinksy’s “Rules for Radicals,” current day issues in the Middle East and the current administrations cover up on Benghazi to name just a few.

Glenn Beck broke down the history of the Middle East on his television program Thursday, focusing on a nearly 100-year-old agreement that he says is integral to understanding the motivations of the Islamic State: the Sykes-Picot Agreement.

If you do not understand this, Beck said, you cannot fully understand the Islamic State, or why the Israelis and the Palestinians will never reach a two-state solution.

Though many go back to 1948 and the creation of the modern state of Israel when examining the history of Middle Eastern conflicts, Beck said you actually have to go back to 1916 and World War I.

T.E. Lawrence and World War I

-2

Glenn Beck speaks about T.E. Lawrence, right, on his television program September 18, 2014.

“This is the last time the Arab world had a united Islamic State led by a religious leader: the Ottoman Empire, the caliphate,” Beck began. “The Allies knew the Ottoman Empire could shut down key shipping routes and cripple Britain’s economy, France’s.

They had to neutralize it. So Great Britain sent over an Army officer from Britain, and his name was T.E. Lawrence. There was a movie made about him, a great movie with Peter O’Toole called ‘Lawrence of Arabia.’”

Lawrence was tasked with convincing the Arabs to fight against the Ottoman Empire. After Lawrence promised the Arabs rule over a new united Arab kingdom of greater Syria — which encompassed present day Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and parts of Iraq and Jordan — he succeeded.

“To get to the root of the current Middle East conflict, that is your starting point,” Beck said. “It is at the center of everything that is happening today.”

“The problem here — Great Britain never intended to honor the promises that they made,” Beck continued. “They had used the Arabs in order to protect their own interests. Remember, they needed to get the Ottoman Empire out of the way.”

Sykes-Picot Agreement

“The entire time Lawrence was negotiating with the Arabs, Great Britain, behind everybody’s back, was negotiating with France, and planning how they were going to actually divide up the Middle East after the war,” Beck said. “They needed to make sure there was no united Arab kingdom that would ever get in the way.”

Under the Sykes-Picot agreement, the British and the French drew new boundaries, fracturing the region so, Beck said, “the British and their allies in the region could control it.”

“Remember, the goal was to divide the Arabs, not to unite them, divide them, so they could protect the trade routes,” Beck said. “They didn’t care about the Arabs, they didn’t care about the Jews, they didn’t care about anything. They wanted the trade routes.”

ISIS: “The End of Sykes-Picot”

The Arabs were forced to accept this western European model of the nation-states because they had no choice,” Beck remarked. “Arab resentment grows in the wake of that treaty, Sykes-Picot, where they have divided everything and made new lines. They wanted — the Palestinians, the Arabs — what was promised to them — the rule of greater Syria.”

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

In the decades after the Sykes-Picot Agreement, after the Ottoman Empire collapsed, the British created the British Mandate for Palestine. The area east of the Jordan River was called Transjordan, and the area west of it was a land for the Jewish people.

“How would the Arab world be able to unite now? They needed a new rallying cry. They would use the Balfour Declaration, Britain’s promise of a Jewish homeland in Palestine,” Beck said. “[They] needed to start blaming the Jews, the pawns.”

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama raises concerns on growing casualties in call with Netanyahu


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

obama-stares-at-netanyahu-550x404-300x220

Forgive me for temporarily taking leave of my senses, but Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should care one angstrom what Obama is concerned about?

Oh yes and take this one to the bank, Obama a well known psychopath is incapable of having any concern about anything, though he does an adequate job of faking it from time to time.

Prime+Minister+Benjamin+Netanyahu

 

Perhaps a more appropriate response would be for Netyanhu to laugh in his face.

Jihad Watch

Jul 21, 2014 

Obama doesn’t seem to have made any reference to Hamas’s practice of staging operations from civilian areas in order to provoke retaliatory fire that would hurt civilians and could thus be used for propaganda purposes. He doesn’t appear to have mentioned the Hamas avowals that they use human shields. No, Obama subscribes to the mainstream media fiction that Israel takes insufficient care (at best) to minimize civilian casualties.

“Obama Raises Concerns On Growing Casualties In Call With Netanyahu,” by Mollie Reilly, Huffington Post, July 20, 2014

President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke Sunday about Israel’s ground operation in Gaza, the White House said in a statement.

According to the White House, Obama raised concerns about the number of casualties in recent days. As the New York Times reported, Sunday marked the deadliest day in the conflict so far, with 87 Palestinians and 13 Israeli soldiers killed.

“The President discussed Israel’s ongoing military operation, reiterated the United States’ condemnation of attacks by Hamas against Israel, and reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself,” the White House said. “The President also raised serious concern about the growing number of casualties, including increasing Palestinian civilian deaths in Gaza and the loss of Israeli soldiers.”

The president also said Secretary of State John Kerry would travel to Cairo, Egypt in order “to seek an immediate cessation of hostilities based on a return to the November 2012 ceasefire agreement.”

During the call, Netanyahu thanked Obama for his support.

Sunday’s call was the second between the two leaders in three days. During a Friday call, Obama urged Netanyahu to minimize civilian deaths.

“We’ve indicated although we support military efforts by the Israelis to make sure that rockets are not being fired into their territory, we also have said that our understanding is the current military ground operations are designed to deal with the tunnels,” Obama told reporters Friday. “And we are hopeful that Israel will continue to approach this process in a way that minimizes civilian casualties.”

Earlier Sunday, Kerry, apparently unaware that he was being recorded prior to an interview with Fox News, candidly expressed his exasperation with the growing number of casualties.
“It’s a hell of a pinpoint operation. It’s a hell of a pinpoint operation,” Kerry said to an off-camera aide. “We’ve got to get over there … I think, John, we ought to go tonight. I think it’s crazy to be sitting around.”

Netanyahu rejects Obama’s offer: Ceasefire “is not even on the agenda”


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

How could Israel’s Prime Minister take anything Obama says seriously?

obama-netanyahu-if-looks-could-kill1

The rest of the world doesn’t, friend or foe and neither do we. 

Netanyahu  was ‘Humiliated’ by Obama Snub

Let’s not forget Obama refused to meet with Netanyahu in the oval office.

Jihad Watch

Jul 12, 2014 

netanyahu_obamaIt has been the pattern for decades now: whenever Israel starts to defend itself, the U.S. President tries to get it to stop. But now that Israel is dealing with a fanatically and consistently anti-Israel President, more and more Israelis (and pro-Israel Americans) are realizing that Israel is on its own against the jihadi onslaught. And so this time the President’s word doesn’t carry as much weight as it did in the past.

An update on this story. “Obama speaks with Netanyahu, offering to broker ceasefire with Hamas,” by Michael Wilner, Jerusalem Post, July 11, 2014:

VIENNA — The United States is prepared to facilitate a cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, US President Barack Obama told Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu by phone today.

In the call, Obama “reiterated the United States’ strong condemnation of continuing rocket fire into Israel by Hamas and other terrorist organizations in Gaza and reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself against these attacks,” the White House said in a readout of the conversation.

But Netanyahu has ruled out a ceasefire with Hamas in the short-term. On the contrary, the Israeli leader has vowed a series of additional stages to Operation Protective Edge— his government’s response to continued rocket fire on Israeli towns and cities, after Hamas, a terrorist organization, stockpiled tens of thousands of rockets in the coastal territory over the last several years.

A ceasefire is “not even on the agenda,” Netanyahu told members of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, just hours before his call with the US leader.

Obama also expressed concern, the press secretary’s office continued, “about the risk of further escalation and emphasized the need for all sides to do everything they can to protect the lives of civilians and restore calm.” ( A complete lode)

Entire article below.

Continue reading

U.S. in secret talks with jihad terrorists of Hamas for six months


crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

I for one. refuse to believe this happened or could have remotely happened.

skuba

Transparency to Obama means scuba diving with zero visiblilty.

Why not just go for a dive in a lake filled with mud?

bullshit

After all, Obama promised us the most transparent administration in U.S. Presidential history. 

4942824964_Obama20_20Hypocrisy2004_xlarge

Pathological liars and sociopaths usually believe their own lies

Jihad Watch

Jun 5, 2014

HamasWell, if he will negotiate with the Taliban, why not with Hamas? Nonetheless, at some point, surely this becomes a violation of federal law — not that Obama is likely to care about that. And with Boehner on the verge of tears and capitulation across the aisle, and the mainstream media ever anxious to make him look good, there is absolutely nothing to hold him accountable. “The U.S. Has Been Speaking To Hamas Through Back Channels For More Than Six Months,” by Sheera Frenkel, BuzzFeed, June 4, 2014 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):

JERUSALEM — United States officials have been holding secret back-channel talks with Hamas over the last six months to discuss their role in the newly formed unity government, according to two senior diplomatic sources with direct knowledge of the talks.

9tnF1op4dA9RFRgZu2xy362fbOsShd28f1BnjZ6Kgx2kJx6lkIeUgxCnEtkk41jrY-VKyIZVFVAWRb04ILtIonN6A0i4Z32hg7z90ehfdDw5G8K61i5lgLRQCyqB10QwqJusruziV_Lvc-KArwsO6HGh84_cfQjHlqxyDGk=s0-d-e1-ft

The meetings were held between U.S. intermediaries and Hamas’ leadership, which lives outside the Gaza Strip in third-party countries ranging from Egypt to Qatar and Jordan. Topics included the ceasefire agreement with Israel and the recently formed unity government between Hamas and Fatah.

During the talks, Hamas gave assurances that allowed the U.S. to support the unity government, despite heavy pressure by the Israeli government for them to condemn it, the diplomatic officials — one American and one Palestinian — said. They said those assurances including a commitment to maintaining a ceasefire with Israel.

“Our administration needed to hear from them that this unity government would move toward democratic elections, and toward a more peaceful resolution with the entire region,” said one U.S. official familiar with the talks.

He spoke on condition of anonymity, as the U.S, government’s official stance is that it has not, and will not, talk to Hamas until certain preconditions are met. “It was important to have that line of communication,” the U.S. official said.

Entire article below.

Continue reading