White House office to delete its FOIA regulations

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

Obama has a very short memory or likely doesn’t give a damn about anything he says or has said as the second video below illustrates.

Hey, what’s one more constitutional breach and unwarranted executive order to add to thousands? 

Five seconds of truth follow immediately below.

WASHINGTON — The White House is removing a federal regulation that subjects its Office of Administration to the Freedom of Information Act, making official a policy under Presidents Bush and Obama to reject requests for records to that office.

Absolute unequivocal bull shit alert directly below. a289bcfa0734-1

The White House said the cleanup of FOIA regulations is consistent with court rulings that hold that the office is not subject to the transparency law. The office handles, among other things, White House record-keeping duties like the archiving of e-mails.

But the timing of the move raised eyebrows among transparency advocates, coming on National Freedom of Information Day and during a national debate over the preservation of Obama administration records. It’s also Sunshine Week, an effort by news organizations and watchdog groups to highlight issues of government transparency.

“The irony of this being Sunshine Week is not lost on me,” said Anne Weismann of the liberal Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW.

“It is completely out of step with the president’s supposed commitment to transparency,” she said. “That is a critical office, especially if you want to know, for example, how the White House is dealing with e-mail.”

Unlike other offices within the White House, which were always exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, the Office of Administration responded to FOIA requests for 30 years. Until the Obama administration, watchdog groups on the left and the right used records from the office to shed light on how the White House works.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

When the Bizarre Becomes More Bizarre: Of course it’s about Muslims

crew-2231By  Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.



Are the police so politically correct in Darby or terrified by Muslims that they are incapable of caring out their oaths to protect the U.S. Constitution and the citizens within their township?

Obama Invites 80,000 Muslim Immigrants Into the United States – Promises 100,000/Per Year for Next 5 Years




He can’t possibly believe anything positive will happen for the U.S. as the result of his treasonous behavior.

The law of the land for Muslims who commit crimes in host countries, if found guilty they are sent back to the countries from which they came.

It’s that simple.





A well known Muslim extremist who was confronted by Britain First outside the Indian embassy in London has been charged with “preparing acts of terrorism.”

This notorious Islamist (aged only 19) features in the iconic photo where he is grilled by Britain First leader Paul Golding, pictured right.

Karim is friends with other Islamic extremists like Anjem Choudary, Abu Izzadeen and Abdullah Deen. Britain First is in the process of stepping up its campaign to oppose the Islamic extremist movement in the UK

Continue reading


There is absolutely no way to determine how many lives his split decision action saved.

It’s time that those who deemed it appropriate to strip him of the Silver Star which was upgraded to the Distinguish Service Cross, spend a few months in an active theater of operation.


By Dan Lamothe / Washington Post


The secretary of the Army is defending his decision to strip awards for heroism from a former Green Beret officer, saying the soldier demonstrated a “lack of honorable conduct” after he earned the medals.

Maj. Mathew L. Golsteyn received the Silver Star in 2011 for valor in Afghanistan on Feb. 20, 2010, and was later approved for an upgrade to the even more prestigious Distinguished Service Cross. That award is considered second only to the Medal of Honor in recognizing heroism in combat.

Golsteyn was later investigated for an undisclosed violation of the military’s rules of engagement in combat — a violation related to the killing of a known enemy bombmaker, according to officials familiar with the case. The investigation closed in 2014 without Golsteyn’s being charged with a crime, but Army Secretary John M. McHugh made the rare decision to strip him of both awards anyway.

The move has been scrutinized by the media and criticized by Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-Calif.), a Marine veteran who has advocated on Golsteyn’s behalf. But McHugh stood by his decision in a new letter to Hunter, saying that the senior officer who initially approved Golsteyn’s Silver Star, Gen. David M. Rodriguez, agreed with his decision.

“Every step in the process of investigating Major Golsteyn’s actions, and reviewing and subsequently revoking his valor awards has been thorough, objective and justified,” McHugh wrote in the Feb. 26 letter, obtained by The Washington Post. “The Army’s investigation demonstrated that Major Golsteyn’s service during or at the time of the distinguished act, achievement or meritorious service was not honorable, which led to the revocation of the Distinguished Service Cross.”

So, this hero is being stripped of his awards for killing an ENEMY BOMB MAKER? By killing this scumbag he saved countless lives! This is completely insane!


Continue reading

White House: Obama very interested in taking executive action on corporate taxes

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.


There he goes again, showing his ignorance on the simple law of physics, as in “What goes up must come down.”

The same is true in economics.



Is Obama so completely dense that he doesn’t grasp that as he raises taxes on corporations they will pass them down as they always have to their customers, thus leaving John Q. Public less money to spend in the private sector thus stimulating the economy, creating wealth and more private sector jobs.

Oh yes, the above question was rhetorical!


White House press secretary Josh Earnest said President Barack Obama is “very interested” in the possibility of using executive action to hike taxes on corporations.

“The president certainly has not indicated any reticence in using his executive authority to try and advance an agenda that benefits middle-class Americans,” Earnest said in response to a question on whether Obama would consider executive actions on taxes.




In a letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called for the Obama administration to close $100 billion in tax loopholes through executive action with the Internal Revenue Service. Sanders, who caucuses with the Democrats, pointed to areas he said the IRS could act without Congress regarding corporate tax loopholes.

Earnest said Obama is “very interested” in looking into the possibility of executive authority, but was noncommittal on the issue.

“Now I don’t want to leave you with the impression that there is some imminent announcement, there is not, at least that I know of,” Earnest said. “But the president has asked his team to examine the array of executive authorities that are available to him to try to make progress on his goals. So I am not in a position to talk in any detail at this point, but the president is very interested in this avenue generally.”

Obama wants Congress to pass corporate tax reform, but Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) has said the proposal would not go anywhere.

Thus the advantage of having tax and spend democrats removed from both houses of congress as majority parties.




Continue reading

How Obama Caused ISIS

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist Oath Keeper and Patriot.





Obama’s incessant dawdling, another mark of his failed leadership and command coupled with not listening to the members of his Joint Chiefs of Staff  and firing flag officers who disagreed with him are indeed the reason ISIS today flourishes.




Obama has done virtually everything he could get away with to destroy America while destroying its military presence at the same time.

It’s time for Obama to be tried for treason.

The National Review

By Ira Straus


The administration has caused or exacerbated most of the current problems in the Mideast.


The Syria policy of the Obama administration is the main reason for the growth of the Islamic State (or ISIS)  – and with it, for the current crisis in Iraq, and for a greatly increased danger of terrorism in Europe and America.

Administration policy has fanned the rebellion in Syria and kept it going for three full years, while doing nothing to bring it to a successful close. Sometimes the administration has explicitly tried to keep the rebels in a stalemate with Assad; Secretary of State Kerry said that it was his policy to do just that, in order to promote negotiations and “peace.” The result, so obvious as to make that statement a shameless Orwellianism, has been to keep the war dragging on.

This has provided the hothouse for the growth of the extremist Islamic State. In due course, it spilled over from Syria into Iraq, and it has issued threats against the American homeland. The Obama-Kerry policy has also made for the more than 190,000 deaths in Syria, 500,000 wounded, and 8 million refugees (more than 2 million abroad, 6 million inside Syria).

This, out of a population of about 22 million.It is hard to imagine a policy more irresponsible, or worse from a moral standpoint. Yet it has been the long-standing policy of Obama and Kerry, and it was Secretary of State Clinton’s, too, until her last weeks in office, when she finally seemed to be getting serious, only to have her new plans thrown out by Kerry.

Fanning a rebellion just up to the point where the country is bleeding continuously — what could be more horrible? As the saying goes, “It is worse than a crime, it is a mistake.” Worse, because it keeps compounding the crime, as a matter of principle. But absurd behaviors often have their causes in beliefs.

This policy has been a logical product of the attitudes and ideologies of the Obama administration: anti-anti-Islamism, moral posturing, moral inversion — enthusiasm about toppling allies like Mubarak, nervousness about toppling adversaries like Assad — and, under the guise of peace, an ideological neutralism directed against one’s own side, something very different from an honestly neutral objectivity.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Points His Finger At The Media Saying ISIS Threat Is An Exaggeration

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.
Focusing upon so-called “Man caused CO2 induced climate change rather that the threat of Islamic Jihadists would be comical if we didn’t have the history of Western Europe as a model for Islam’s objectives.
obama-icebergObama and his brain washed druid minions are much the same as Muslim Jihadists.  They are not concerned with facts or reality they just follow the teachings of their leaders, Mohammad or Obama.The primary difference being one has long since been dead. 



February 10, 2015


In an interview with VOX, a far-left publication, President Obama pointed his finger at the media saying they are exaggerating the danger ISIS poses to Americans.

The Editor of VOX, Ezra Klein, asked Obama if he believes the media “sometimes overstates the level of alarm people should have about terrorism as apposed to climate change.”

The president’s response was, “Absolutely!”

Obama is of the belief that because ISIS is a “sexier story,” the media focuses on it and said, “If it bleeds, it leads.”

It is very interesting that Obama chose VOX to give his extensive interview. VOX, “just last Saturday was claiming that those who took issue with Obama’s reprehensible moral equivalence regarding the Crusades were just looking for an excuse to hate Muslims,” reports Jihad Watch.

“That is the milieu from which Obama comes, and in which he is most comfortable. That is, almost certainly, his world view as well: that those who believe that Islam uniquely teaches and justifies violence in a way that Christianity and other religions do not are motivated solely by hatred of Muslims.

This is the line that Hamas-linked CAIR and its henchmen have promoted for years. In the White House today, they have their most powerful champion ever.”

So, while the White House seems to be pumping up their Global Warming campaign, they are downplaying the fear-factor ISIS instills on Americans by blaming the media for it’s alleged hyped up reporting.

But, why then, did Obama also say “It is entirely legitimate for the American people to be deeply concerned when you’ve got a bunch of violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris?” Obama went on to say that “We devote enormous resources to that, and it is right and appropriate for us to be vigilant and aggressive in trying to deal with that – the same way a big city mayor’s got to cut the crime rate down if he wants that city to thrive.”

Obama also submitted that the ‘targeted’ murder of Jews at a kosher supermarket last month was simply a ‘random shooting.’

Choosing ‘violent extremism’ to describe the terrorists who behead anyone who will not conform to their religious belief system, Obama refuses to call the group threatening our nation by their name, the Islamic State.

Obama, showing just how out of touch he is, points his finger at our media saying it is they who are to blame for the ISIS fear instilled in American citizens and insinuating that global warming is a better place to focus our worries and attentions.



Continue reading

Obama changes objective in war on ISIS from ‘destroy’ to ‘defeat’

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The situations in the title above may at first be confusing to the reader.

Not to worry, when Obama talks it’s for a photo-op or to help him from falling asleep.

Frequent visitors to this site understand  that his words mean nothing.

obama-pentagon_c0-42-1024-638_s561x327-1 Barack Obama speaking his plans:Pentagon photo.

The wording in the video is “So Obama,” play close attention as he says, “We have the Leadership.” comma, comma and the military to defeat the Islamic State. 

How about more military presence and aid and less “Leadership,” that Americans have not had since that cold January morning in 2009 when Obama was sworn in to office.

– The Washington Times – Friday, February 6, 2015

President Obama is changing the objective in the war against the Islamic State from “destroy” to “defeat.”

Military analysts say there is a big difference.

When Mr. Obama made a nationally televised address last September to announce the new war, he said the objective was to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the Islamic State, also known as ISIL or ISIS.

But Friday, the White House released its new national security strategy that says, “We have undertaken a comprehensive effort to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL.”

“A big difference in terms of commitment and resources,” said Robert Maginnis, a retired Army officer and military analyst. “Destroying the enemy, depending on the nature of the enemy a state or non-state actor, means we will kill all combatants and their means to continue the fight––factories, transportation networks, economy.

“Defeat could mean a political solution that leaves the enemy combatants alive and ready to fight another day.”

 ISIL, an extremely violent Sunni terror army, now controls large portions of territory in Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. launched an air campaign last August, but Mr. Obama has ruled out the introduction of ground combat forces, saying the Iraq army must fill that void.


Continue reading

Obama Gives Lame Excuse for Not Meeting with Israeli Prime Minister

crew-2231Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

There is hardball, baseball and “T-Ball.” The interview by CNN’s   Fareed Zakaria below, was pure “T-Ball.”  He put the ball up on the “T” and let Obama, control the entire interview.

Any wonder why CNN’s ratings are circling the drain? 


Obama is completely clueless. If as he said, Israel’s Mossad, has assured the world that Iran is playing nice, with “No further uranium enrichment,” what’s to keep them from turning on a dime and firing up their program.

With Obama in place they hold the aces while Obama clings to his delusions.

Eagle Rising

When House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) went off the reservation and invited the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to speak before a joint session of Congress on the dangers of an unchecked Iran – pretty much everyone realized that he was sending a message to the White House.

Boehner was tired of President Obama simply bypassing Congress on important issues and choosing to break protocol by “going it alone.” So Boehner, did what any schoolyard kid would do… he copied the President, and went it “alone.”

The invite was a purposeful slap to the Obama White House, but Boehner may have unknowingly created an even bigger PR nightmare than he realized. President Obama’s immediate reaction to the hubbub was to say that he wouldn’t be meeting with Netanyahu in a seeming swipe at both Boehner and the Israeli Prime Minister (who made the President angry by accepting Boehner’s invite).

The problem is… now you have to give a reason for not meeting with the leader of one of our nation’s closest allies. So team Obama came up with a reason… it’s just not a very good one.

Fareed Zakaria: Last week, it was announced that the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is going to come to Washington and do a joint session of Congress at the invitation of the Republican speaker of the House. Many people are saying this is rebuttal of your arguments of negotiations with Iran, or a possible deal with Iran. Do you think it’s appropriate for him to come in this manner at this time to Washington? 

President Obama: Well, I’ll let Mr. Boehner answer that and Mr. Netanyahu. I speak with Prime Minister Netanyahu all the time. You know, we’re declining to meet with him. I’m declining to meet with him, simply because our general policy is we don’t meet with any world leader two weeks before their election. I think that’s inappropriate. 

See entire article below.

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: