‘Long, domestic cold war’ under way in US

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.
There can be little doubt that we are living in a more tyrannical environment than when King George caused patriots to dump barrels of tea bags into the Boston Harbor.
That was just about taxes, think of the number of tyrannical moves that Obama has put upon us since he rode into Washington on his camel!

In what one liberty activist described as a “long, domestic cold war,” and others have referred to as “the stealth war,” the U.S. appears to be embroiled in a dispute of clashing ideological realities. So deep is the divide that besets America that many political observers have noted that historically there has been nothing like it since the Civil War in the 1860s.

This war, however, has nothing whatsoever to do with slavery, race, prejudice, or discrimination. Rather, the issue is quite simple — liberty vs. tyranny, individual freedom vs. government oppression, Constitutional law vs. the whims of an elitist political ruling class, free market capitalism vs. Marxism/socialism, and personal sovereignty vs. collectivism.

In addition, this war is being fought in an entirely different manner than past wars. This is called “Fourth Generation Warfare” that focuses on outsmarting the enemy rather than killing him. In fact, patriots who are involved in the fight to preserve liberty are not interested in killing anyone, particularly not innocent civilians. The objective, rather, is to gain the upper hand using the all of the tools of one’s intellect.

This means we outsmart the enemy and beat him at his own game. Mike Vanderboegh put it best when he stated in a speech last year that the components of Fourth Generation Warfare are defy, resist, evade, smuggle. I later added nonviolent sabotage as another component.

Someone may be reading this wondering when the war is going to start and when will these components of Fourth Generation Warfare be implemented. In all likelihood they have already been implemented right under your nose. And the war has been ongoing for quite some time.

Examples abound. For instance, owners of so-called “assault weapons” in Connecticut are defying and resisting the new state laws that require them to register such weapons with the state and also to register high capacity magazines. When the deadline for registration had passed, the state reported that out of 360,000 owners of assault weapons in the state only about 50,000 had registered those weapons.

That means, interestingly enough, that in a deeply blue, anti-gun state like Connecticut, 300,000 citizens are engaging in civil disobedience, defying the law and resisting the effort to criminalize them by a simple change of definitions in the law.

It is a certainty that citizens are doing this in other states as well, such as New York, Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, and Colorado.

It is also a certainly that nonviolent sabotage has been implemented in several national incidents, but news organizations are so clueless about the facts that they have totally missed the connection.

The next phase of this stealth war is ready to be implemented, and in some areas it already has.

Vanderboegh reports that he has received enough donations from patriots to begin sending more high capacity magazines to high profile anti-gun politicians, journalists, and others. Vanderboegh calls this program “Toys for Totalitarians,” the first phase of which was implemented prior to Christmas, and prompting the state police in one commonwealth to send word to Vanderboegh via his local county sheriff that was needed for questioning.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

Obama Administration’s Two Quiet New Executive Actions on Who Can Buy a Gun

Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

obamacare-police-state-obama-liar-antichristThe only thing Obama does well.

Is their no federal law that Obama is not willing to attempt to overturn?

All this invasion of privacy because of the ignorance on the lefts lack of understanding of the Second Amendment?


Under ‘The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability” Act, or HIPPA, which protects medical privacy.

If Obama and his henchmen are not brought to heel on this specific law, we can say good bye to doctor patient confidentially.  Of course NSA probably already has our records, they don’t have much to do these days.

The Blaze, Jan. 3, 2014  Fred Lucas

After failing to strengthen background checks on gun buyers through Congress, the Obama administration on Friday announced pending executive action on the matter focused mainly on mental health issues that would allow the government to get around certain privacy laws on the books in order to obtain more information.

Obama Administrations Two Quiet New Executive Actions on Who Can Buy a Gun

Photo: AP

The new restrictions would take the form of regulations from the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services.

One of the regulations would seek to gain information previously withheld because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPPA, which protects medical privacy.

“Too many Americans have been severely injured or lost their lives as a result of gun violence,” a White House release said Friday.

“While the vast majority of Americans who experience a mental illness are not violent, in some cases when persons with a mental illness do not receive the treatment they need, the result can be tragedies such as homicide or suicide.”

The administration’s Friday post-holiday announcement came while President Barack Obama was still on vacation in Hawaii, in stark contrast to Obama’s first executive actions on guns, which were announced in a White House ceremony.

“Friday news dump” announcements have also traditionally been used to try to avoid media scrutiny.

 Entire article below.

The Three Most Important Ongoing Second Amendment Cases


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It’s a safe be that Supreme Court Justices Kagan and Sotomayor will vote against two of these cases as the both lied during their senate confirmation hearings.

elena_kagan_sonia_sotomayorElana Kagan & Silvia Sotomayor

When asked about their position on the Second Amendment both said that Heller was case-law and they would not vote to  change it. 

You think Kagan isn’t in the tank with the Obama Agenda?

Check the video below.  (Second part)

At their first opportunity they changed their minds and voted with the anti-gunners, thus adjudicating from the bench and making their confirmation hearings a mockery.  


Drake v. Filko is one of the most important cases they will decide.  Basically in their cert, the plaintiffs ask the Supreme Court to decide if the 2nd Amendment is assaulted by not allowing legal hand gun owners to carry their hand guns outside their homes.  

In a nutshell, have prior attacks on the Second Amendment rendered it as useless as saying one can own a baseball bat but never bring it to the ball park.

Reason Magazine

Addressing who can own guns, where they can carry them, and whether guns can be transported to a second home.

Since the 2010 Supreme Court case McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the ruling in the 2008 Heller case (which said the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms) to states and localities, the Court has so far evaded any new case about the limits and meaning of the Second Amendment

See entire article below.

Continue reading

DOJ internal memo confirms Obama plan for gun confiscation


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, and Patriot.

It’s really quite simple, the forces of tyranny never give up.

An internal memo within the Department of Justice (DOJ) has surfaced which confirms that the Obama administration had plans for gun registration and confiscation in the aftermath of the Newtown school shooting.

According to Bob Owens, the NRA obtained the memo in February. But apparently there were questions as to the veracity of the information. Owens says that the existence of the memo, and its outline of a plan for gun registration and confiscation, can now be confirmed.

The document, which can be viewed here, was not released to the public via the news media.

Owens cites an analysis of the memo, including direct quotes from the document, which exposes the Obama administration’s real agenda on guns:

The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.

Thus, despite the many denials by Obama, by members of his administration, and by Congressional Democrats, once again it has become clear that the administration’s true agenda is very different from that which is presented to the public.

The goal is and always has been gun registration and confiscation.

The Examiner has often reported the Obama agenda on guns, which can be traced all the way back to his years in the Illinois legislature. He was considered among the most aggressive anti-gun advocates in Illinois.

Obama voted to criminalize any homeowner who used an illegal firearm to defend himself and/or his family in the event of a home invasion by dangerous criminals.

The philosophy that underlies such a point of view is clear. To Obama it is more important that a gun be “legal” than for human lives to be saved. This stance portrays a shocking disregard for the sanctity of human life.

Thus, many conservatives warned as far back as 2007 that an Obama candidacy for the presidency would be a very dangerous turn for America. Obama would never tell the public just how radical he is. To do so would end his political career.

This is why Obama denied repeatedly that he had been close friends with murderous homegrown terrorists such as Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn. The couple bombed federal buildings, encouraged teenagers to murder their parents, and were arrested for the murder of a police officer but were released on a technicality.

Entire article below.

Continue reading

‘Whose Side Are You On?’ Columbine Survivor Blasts Obama


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

The article below appeared in the “Political Outcast,” online website. 


In his letter below, Evan Todd nails Obama for being a complete fraud, not surprisingly his comments are not put forth by the media.

If American voters weren’t so ignorant and would take 15 minutes a day to do independent research on Barack Benghazi Obama he would become their political out cast.


Television news, propaganda and disinformation at its finest

Of course that would require turning off the television and the low information voter isn’t about to do that. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.


The Political Outcast


President Obama says he wants to restrict Americans’ rights under the Second Amendment in order to “save lives,” but Evan Todd isn’t buying it.

Todd was one of the people injured in the infamous Columbine High School shootings, and in a recent open letter to President Obama, he pulled no punches.

“Why would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens?” he demanded. “Whose side are you on?”

It’s a question many people have wondered about.

The shooting survivor stresses that under Obama’s proposals, law-abiding Americans would be put in danger by being restricted from owning certain weapons or having the amount of ammunition they can carry limited.

Todd points out that assault weapons bans have little effect on crime, and in particular he notes that the original federal weapons ban did nothing to protect him from being shot in 1999.

“It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher. The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke,” Todd wrote.

Todd takes a particular exception to requiring universal background checks:

Entire article below:

Continue reading

Justice Scalia “The Constitution is Dead”


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, and Patriot.

It should be quite amusing to see how the media picks up this sound bite if the are intelligent enough to do so.


Unknowing progressives will become orgasmic at the title of this article.


I know what Scalia means, but part of me couldn’t help but think there was a little irony in the Justice’s recent pronouncement:


“[The Constiution’s] not a living document. It’s dead, dead, dead!” Speaking to a group at Southern Methodist University, Scalia was promoting what he considers a “strict constructionist” interpretation of the Constitution.

Even with the usurpation of Obama and his Marxist allies currently playing the dictators from hell, We the People may bend we will not break and our Constitution will prevail.


That will be long after Obama and his minions are pushing up daisy  at a local bone orchard.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

The Political Outcast


Justice Scalia  “The Constitution is Dead”I know what Scalia means, but part of me couldn’t help but think there was a little irony in the Justice’s recent pronouncement: “[The Constiution’s] not a living document. It’s dead, dead, dead!” Speaking to a group at Southern Methodist University, Scalia was promoting what he considers a “strict constructionist” interpretation of the Constitution.

The debate on how to interpret the Constitution is older than the Constitution.

Most of the Founding Fathers were strict constructionists (as you would imagine… since they drafted the document. Of course they wanted it interpreted as it was written). Over time, as high technology and low morals altered the nature of American society and politics, the question started to arise more and more: “Isn’t this document a little outdated? But rather than re-write it, why not just interpret it freshly for our modern circumstances?” Which basically meant, “Why not just ignore the clear intent of the Founding Fathers and just draw from the Constitution whatever we want it to say…(Entire article below)

Continue reading

Veteran Stands Up For 2nd Amendment At Chicago Anti-Gun Forum


Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper and Patriot.

It’s insightful to listen to a member of the military who has served his country in combat interact with a group of people interested in passing legislation that would prohibit carrying a concealed weapon.

Their differences on how they interpret the constitution are oh so predictable.


A military veteran delivered a passionate defense of the Second Amendment at a Chicago-area anti-gun “forum” Sunday, saying he went to war to protect all Americans’ inalienable rights, including the right to bear arms. He also argued the threat of “tyranny” is still just as real as it was in the past.

Progressives don’t seem to get that Obama by his daily moves and under the cover of darkness moves has a game plan for the rest of us. 

It clearly doesn’t compute for them that with out the 2nd Amendment they can say goodbye to the First. 

In his view of America We the People become serfs on Uncle Sam’s Plantation.

I choose freedom!

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Treacherous waters ahead for gun control advocates

images-1Comment by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist and Patriot.

Examiner writer Andy Martin make excellent points as he catalogues the results of legislators who attempt to take away our Constitutional rights.

As he points out, the Clinton, so-called Assault Weapon ban of 1996 was proved to be a abject failure in the Columbine murders in 1999.


Who do our elected officials believe they are when they can turn everyday citizens into criminals;  because they believe they should be able to protect themselves, from muggers, rapists, murders, car jackers and home invaders. 

It is the view of this editor that normal law abiding citizens will be putting pressure on politicians to allow them to carry concealed weapons after completing training courses to do so. 

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message. 

The Examiner

Writing in an op-ed piece for the Washington Post Saturday, Scott Higham, Sari Horwitz, David S. Fallis, and Joel Achenback stated that treacherous waters lie ahead for gun control advocates. The reason is the history of the movement to limit the Constitutional rights of citizens, which shows that such attempts have usually backfired. Complete article below.